Daily Archives: March 9, 2010

You call THAT an addiction? I don’t.

A friend of the Mac persuasion, who is constantly waxing lyrical about her iPhone and can’t wait to get an iPad (you know how Apple people can be), passes this on:

A new Stanford University survey confirms what many iPhone users may have long suspected: Apple’s smartphone can be addicting.The survey was administered to 200 students with iPhones, 70 percent of whom had owned their iPhones for less than a year.

The most interesting trend was how quickly the iPhone became an indispensable part of the students’ lifestyles, and how many of them openly acknowledged they would be lost without it.

OK, sure, as a Crackberry user, I can see how that might happen. But then they present the basis for these findings:

Nearly 85 percent of the iPhone owners used the phone as their watch, and 89 percent used it as their alarm clock. In fact, 75 percent admitted to falling asleep with the iPhone in bed with them, and 69 percent said they were more likely to forget their wallet than their iPhone when leaving in the morning.

Well, now, come on — who doesn’t use even an ordinary cell phone as their watch, and as their alarm clock? I started doing that years ago, and who wouldn’t. Do people still buy watches, except for the really expensive ones that a certain kind of materialistic show-off twit wears as jewelry?

True, it’s a little disturbing that 30 percent of respondents reported that their phone is a “doorway into the world,” but I have the impression the researchers chose that creepy language. And face it; it IS a doorway into the world — several doorways, in fact.

And how often do you use your wallet in a given day, compared to how often you use a smartphone — for your e-mail, for Twitter, for Facebook, for blogging, to take pictures and video, and occasionally make a phone call? I might, just might, pull my wallet out of my pocket twice in a day, but sometimes go all day without touching it.

I mean, hello?!?!? Do you know what century this is, Stanford?

Cromartie stepping down today

Just saw this over at The State:

Embattled Columbia City Councilman E.W. Cromartie said he will resign by the end of today.

Cromartie, at City Hall, said he would step down and urged the city to hold an election to replace him on April 6, with the other city elections.

Cromartie agreed to plead guilty to federal tax evasion and structuring monetary transactions to evade reporting requirements, according to documents filed Friday in Columbia.

That would be something if they could do this along with the others on April 6. Apparently, that’s a possibility. I’m undecided as to whether that would be too fast. And I’m asking myself, Why does E.W. want it to be then?

Finding comedy in draconian state budget cuts (Gina, you are such a card!)

Just saw this from Gina Smith on Twitter:

State budget cuts mean Dept of Commerce will likely “suspend all foreign trade missions.” Maybe this should have been considered in 2008?

I gather that Gina — who, as you will recall, was the one who caught our governor at the airport sneaking back into the country from Argentina — is covering some sort of hearing on budget cuts at the State House. (Maybe she’s at the “the Tuesday Ways and Means Standing Committee Budget Briefing for Members of the House;” I don’t know.)

Anyway, it’s not all fun and games, as Gina goes on to reveal just moments ago:

Commission on Indigent Defense is likely to cut 43 public defenders bc of state budget cuts. Good gravy! How many are left? Like 3?

You have to have a certain ability to take things lightly, covering the State House, or you’ll go quite mad…

These are some brave kids, coming here with that message

immigration copy

A friend I work with through the Hispanic Ministry at my church (I’m involved because I read the gospel in Spanish at Mass) sent me this interesting notice about an upcoming event at the Russell House, hoping for some publicity:

The Consortium for Latino Immigration Studies
invite you for a Q & A session

Trail of Dreams:
Students March from Miami to DC

The four students, who are on a four month, 1500 mile walk from Miami to Washington DC to protest the lack of legislation granting legal status to illegal immigrants.  They are making a stop here on campus at USC.  Come to hear their story and to learn more. The protesters include Carlos Roa, 22, who was 2 years old when his parents brought him here from Venezuela, and Felipe Matos, 23, sent from Brazil by his mother when he was 14. They say they support proposals in overhaul bills that would open a path to citizenship for students who came to this country illegally when they were young.

Russell House Theater,
Monday, March 15 at 6:00 PM

Those are some brave kids, coming to South Carolina with that message. This is not exactly what you’d call fertile ground for the seeds they’re sowing. Of course, it can be hoped that they’ll get a warmer reception here than they did in Nahunta, Ga.

To read more about what they’re up to, go here or here or here, at what appears to be the official site.

Don’t know what I think about their cause. They would appear, at first blush, to be from the end of the political spectrum that is equal and opposite to the one my friend Doug Ross subscribes to. Personally, I’m cheering for Lindsay Graham, who apparently is trying yet again (in spite of the fact that there’s little political reward in it for him) to find a comprehensive, reasonable solution.

Why does Starbucks keep snubbing me?

No, I am not paranoid. It’s just that I’ve made no secret of my love of Starbucks. I’ve made it clear that my blog is available for advertising Starbucks. I give it free plugs all the time, such as here and here and here and here and here and here and …

I even offer constructive, loving criticism when warranted, when I’m worried that Starbucks is wandering down an unproductive path (which very seldom happens, of course).

Yet today, on the anniversary of my getting laid off (a day on which one might expect me to be a bit fragile), the fancy-schmantzy New York Times is just flaunting its relationship with Starbucks — just strutting up and down the sidewalk along the Information Superhighway, with Starbucks on its arm, saying look who advertises with me… Just look at that huge banner ad promoting Yukon Blend! Why, I happen to have an open pound of Yukon Blend beans at home myself at this very minute (plus a couple of pounds of other varieties in reserve in my pantry), because I have to have Starbucks even when I can’t get to the actual shop. Don’t talk to me about Yukon Blend…

And I’ve gotta say, it hurts.

Why does Starbucks forsake me?

The way it is, Tuesday, March 9, 2010

Today’s virtual front page, again on the p.m. cycle (which is my favorite cycle):

E.W. Cromartie to resign in plea agreement — That’s still the most important fact in this second-day story; the fact that he’s going to prison is less important to citizens and voters. You may want to read this impact piece that was in The State today, although it doesn’t tell anything about what happens next that you didn’t already know if you follow these things. (Still don’t know when the special election will be.)

ID Card for Workers Is at Center of Immigration Plan — Our own Lindsey Graham is among those still trying, despite all the setbacks, to pass true, effective, comprehensive immigration reform. And you may not have known that.

Northrop Quits Tanker Bid — Now that Boeing is coming to SC, this is sort of a local business story. This long fight now ends well for Boeing. How good is this news for that company? $40 billion worth of good.

Israel announces East Jerusalem homes as Biden visits — I’ve sort of been watching the buildup to this for a couple of days — Israel moving toward building new settlements, and Palestinian officials being willing to negotiate anyway, which is promising. Biden’s visit is a good opportunity to move this to the front page.

Obama Turns Up the Volume in Health Care Bid — The continuing political saga.

No Dem frontrunner, poll says — I just include this as a make-note-of thing. This Rasmussen Poll doesn’t really tell us anything except that voters aren’t paying attention yet, which we already knew. Truth is, there’s every reason to believe Vincent Sheheen’s the frontrunner, which I think Dwight Drake decided before quitting.

My blasted e-mail

Once again, I’m sorry if you tried to sent me e-mail earlier today. After having spent considerable time last week deleting hundreds of messages (Web mail, which I have to use since Outlook is busted — and has been since October– is very slow and tedious to work with, even doing something as simple as deleting messages), and since then I’ve tried to delete some every day.

But it still froze up in the wee hours this morning, telling people it was full.

So I’ve killed hundreds of more messages, and it’s working now. For the moment.

I was laid off one year ago today

This morning I was having breakfast at the usual place with Mark Nichols, an attorney from Little Rock, Ark., who’s writing a book about the South. I’m still not entirely sure what the book’s about, except that it’s meant to be an update of a book published in 1938 called A Southerner Discovers the South, by Jonathan W. Daniels. Not having read that book, I asked what sort of book this would be — travelogue, politics, culture? He said it would be all of the above.

He had interviewed David Beasley and Henry McMaster the previous day, so I spent some of our time setting him straight. (Just kidding, Henry — but not really kidding, David.) I was also able to deliver a sort of primer on Columbia. The Capital City Club is a great vantage point for doing that. Since it takes up the whole top floor of the city’s tallest building, you just walk around to windows on the four sides and point out the things you’re talking about. (And along the river there, parallel to it, is the Columbia canal. It was dug by Irish laborers in the 1820s — they were cheaper than slave labor, because they didn’t have to be fed. Their situation was pretty desperate, and my church — that’s it right there, St. Peter’s was started by the bishop in Charleston, who sent a priest here to minister to the Irish laborers. Right at our feet is the Vista, which… and so forth.)

Anyway, at some point something came up about newspapers, and I asked whether he understood that I had been laid off by the paper (the paper owned by McClatchy, which also owns the paper Mr. Daniels’ family once owned) — and he nodded (he’d read up on me ahead of time), and then I said, “… about a year ago…” and I stopped…

It was a year ago today that I was told I was being laid off. The publisher, who had been out of town and was arriving back that day (a Monday), had called ahead to arrange a meeting with me in his office, which was only separated from mine by a conference room (my office had actually been the publisher’s office originally, several publishers ago). He was delayed and had to reschedule to later in the day. He was obviously anxious to have this meeting, while I dreaded it. That’s because I was almost sure that I knew what it was about. I was pretty sure that I was going to be told I had to lay off my good friend Robert Ariail. I had fought it off and gotten it postponed time and again, but all sorts of signs in recent weeks — plus some overt statements — had prepared me for that.

The newspaper’s financial situation was nightmarish — not anyone’s fault; the industry was just imploding, its business model collapsing beneath it — so I knew that quite a few people would be let go, and soon.

And yes, this was a fateful day for Robert. What I wasn’t prepared for was being told “Your position is being eliminated.” The reason this was a surprise was that I had always assumed I’d be the last person left in the editorial department — a prospect that depressed me severely. You see, I was the one person in the department who knew how to do everything — write, edit, design pages, see them through the production process. I couldn’t draw editorial cartoons, but I was the only person other than Robert who knew how to fetch them from the Web, work them in Photoshop, and so forth. I knew how to do everything, and was good at it, so if ever the editorial department were to become a one-man show, after having consisted of nine people at the start of the decade, I’d be that one man. And I hated the thought, and I hated the fact. I’d already had to lay off a friend or two (very strong, hard-working, smart people whose situations had absolutely nothing to do with their performance), and I knew for a fact I’d have to do it again, probably repeatedly. I would have quit to avoid it, except for two reasons: One, I wasn’t sure how to go about looking for another job. I couldn’t ask any friends or professional contacts to keep their eyes open for something else I might do, for ethical reasons — anyone in a position to help me find a new job would almost certainly be someone I’d have to deal with professionally as editor. I couldn’t even hint, although I was frequently tempted to. Secondly, I felt too much of a sense of duty to quit. I truly believed I was the individual best qualified to be editorial page editor of South Carolina’s largest newspaper. (I still believe it.) And I believed that it was critically important to South Carolina to have a good editor in that position.

Sounds awfully egotistical, doesn’t it? Even messianic, delusional. But that’s what I thought. It didn’t make me proud; it just made me feel like I couldn’t quit.

I never even suspected that the decision of whose position to cut next would be made on the basis of who made the most money. I was one of three vice presidents laid off in that round (the other two were the heads of circulation and specialty publications).

Stupid me, huh?

Well, the nice thing about the situation was that I was now free to search for a job, to think creatively about how I wanted to spend the rest of my working life — to start a new career entirely. Which was really cool, because I love doing new stuff (it’s why I started the blog, back in 2005 — newspapering was moribund and all about cutting back and doing less, and it was the one way I could move forward and do more, which is sort of necessary to my sanity). The bad news, of course, was that we were in the middle of the worst economy since the Great Depression, and no one was inclined to take a chance creating the kind of quirky position that a guy with my skills and knowledge and contacts might usefully fill. A couple of years earlier, I’d have been in a great position. Or a couple of years from now. Bad timing.

But things are actually going pretty well now, a year later. Not nearly as great as I might like and making ends meet is a bit of a struggle, but pretty well. It’s certainly interesting, and often fun. I expect to have some good news to share with you soon. I’ll write about that later. Today, I just thought I’d make note of the anniversary of my liberation…