Biloxi blues

5 Replies

I suppose this is extreme pedantry on my part, and definitely goes under the heading of trivial concerns in the face of the devastation wrought by Katrina (the one with the storm surge, not to be confused with the one with the "Waves"), but something has been bugging me the last couple of days: The persistent mispronunciation of "Biloxi."

I wasn’t going to say anything, but NPR just woke me up with yet another such offense. Rather than explain it myself, I’ll refer you to this blog entry. I’m assuming the "Gray Ghost" knows whereof he speaks — or maybe I just think so because this is the way I have always said it. If someone knows differently, and has authoritative proof that the way we usually hear it via broadcast media is correct, I’m all ears.

Oh, and by the way, it’s not that I frequent the site where I found that item. It appears to be a bit out there on the libertarian fringe for my tastes. I found the above-referenced posting by Googling "pronounce Biloxi." I was unable to find anything authoritative-looking — such as, say, a ruling from the Biloxi Chamber of Commerce or something like that. About the only sites that even brought up the subject were the sort that concern themselves with "Biscuits, grits and such." That’s the vaunted Information Superhighway for you. When I run into brick walls such as this one, I wonder why Al Gore bothered to invent the blamed thing to begin with.

5 thoughts on “Biloxi blues”

  1. Mike C

    Michael Daly has a great column about a Big Apple / Biloxi connection in today’s NY Daily News.

    With news of the awesome destruction down South comes a memory from the terrible days after 9/11, when a big banner went up in Times Square.
    “Biloxi loves NYC!” the banner announced.
    The banner was sent by Biloxi High School to Stephen Pitalo, a graduate of the Class of 1986 who had moved from that Mississippi city to New York and became a TV and radio producer. He also received boxes of relief supplies collected by students at the Biloxi grammar school he attended, Nativity of the Blessed Virgin Mary.
    Along with hanging the banner, Pitalo personally delivered the boxes to the recovery effort at what had been the World Trade Center. The gloves, socks, goggles and first-aid cream no doubt came in handy, but what mattered most was the goodwill from Biloxi and so many other places.
    It felt as if goodness itself had risen in response to the absolute evil that struck in downtown Manhattan. The country and indeed the world seemed to unite behind us.
    These four years later, we had particular cause to remember the message of love from Biloxi, as reports of the havoc wreaked by Hurricane Katrina flashed on the news zipper directly above where the banner had hung in Times Square.
    Pitalo’s grandmother as well as several aunts and uncles still live in Biloxi, but he reports that they all had evacuated before the storm hit. He noted that his family had lived there for generations and had seen dozens of hurricanes.
    “They knew that the smart thing to do is get out,” Pitalo said yesterday.
    The 36-year-old had himself lived through seven hurricanes before moving North. He had found this to be good training for that September day in 2001 when he glanced up at the Jumbotron in Times Square on the way to work and saw one of the twin towers ablaze. The second plane struck as he arrived at his office on Broadway and he got right on the phone to assure his family in Biloxi that he was all right.
    “That’s what you do in a hurricane, too,” Pitalo said yesterday. “There’s something about having gone through a lot of hurricanes that makes you snap into emergency mode and know the things you need to do.”
    Until this week, the worst hurricane to strike Biloxi in modern times was Camille in 1969.
    “It had such an overwhelming effect on the coast,” Pitalo said. “Until very recently people always referred to it as The Hurricane.”
    Now there is Katrina.
    “There’s a whole generation I’m sure that is going to refer to this as The Hurricane,” he said.
    He noted that his grandmother’s house is less than a block from the beach.
    “It pains me to think what she’s going to come home to,” he said.
    But he understood that too many families had not been as fortunate as his own.
    “Apparently, they’re still finding bodies,” he said.
    Even so, Pitalo emphasized that he was not equating the storm with the attack on the World Trade Center. The news footage from down South shows mile after mile after mile of devastation, but this was only property. The direst predictions do not come anywhere near the death toll at the twin towers.
    The numbers meant little when you watched the TV news footage of a man in Biloxi describing how his wife was swept away from his grip when the water tore into his house. She had yet to be found.
    The footage prompted hundreds of calls to the network offering sympathy and support from all over, a welling of the same goodness that blessed us here after 9/11. Pitalo noted yesterday that both the Red Cross and the Salvation Army are accepting donations to assist with the relief effort in the hurricane zone.
    “I hope people will remember there’s folks down there who really need their help,” Pitalo said.
    Meanwhile, let us say this:
    “NYC Loves Biloxi!”
    And Gulfport and New Orleans and all those other stricken places that opened their hearts to us in our darkest time.
    Originally published on August 31, 2005

    It sounds like a great idea.

    Reply ↓
  2. Jackie Perrone

    RE: Katrina. What aobut this headline:
    “What’s Wrong With Looting?” Personally, I don’t see a reason on earth why struggling people who have lost everything shouldn’t help themselves in Walgreen’s, etc. The store will never able to use or sell that merchandise. If someone can use the diapers, T-shirts, or whatever, why not? Why don’t the retailers just invite folks to help themselves?
    What do you think?
    Jackie Perrone [email protected]

    Reply ↓
  3. Carl Johnson

    If you try one search, and it doesn’t work, and then you don’t try a different search or approach and instead complain about how the Internet didn’t yield the information you wanted, maybe the problem isn’t with the Internet. Maybe the problem is that you’re stupid.
    If there were only some sort of document (paper or online) that presented words along with their pronunciations. It could include definitions as well! I wonder why someone hasn’t invented a document like that.
    Or maybe they have. . .

    Reply ↓
  4. Brad Warthen

    Oh, come on — dictionaries are SO 18th century. And I have to use one all day at my real work, so it would be such a drag to haul it out while blogging.
    Besides, mine — Webster’s New World College Dictionary, which is the official one we use for style purposes here at the paper — wimps out and gives BOTH pronunciations. Although it does give the right one first, indicating that is the preferred one, it still allows as how both are allowable.
    And when I’m being pedantic, I tend not to settle for that. Stupid me, and all that.

    Reply ↓
  5. Carl Johnson

    “Although it does give the right one first, indicating that is the preferred one, it still allows as how both are allowable.”
    Well, that should have taken care of it, then. If a dictionary lists both pronunciations as acceptable, how is it an “offense” to use one instead of another?
    “I wasn’t going to say anything,”
    Yeah, you should have followed your first impulse.

    Reply ↓

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *