I hereby issue a hearty welcome to a slew of new bloggers, all associated with the newspaper’s new community blog, TheColumbiaRecord.com. I do this with slightly mixed feelings, as this is competition I can ill afford. Some of these people (if not all of them) are already better at this than I am. I hope they will only spur me on to make my blog that much better. Either that, or the pressure will provide that last little straw necessary to make me crack, and you’ll see me running naked through the streets screaming "The Visigoths are coming!" in Esperanto. Which to you will appear normal, but I promise there is a distinction here somewhere.
Anyway, I thought the most neighborly way I could greet these interlopers would be to run Cindi’s column about them, right here on our stage, with handy links.
So here it is:
TheColumbiaRecord.com will change
how you think about bloggers
By CINDI ROSS SCOPPE
Associate Editor
BLOGGERS, like the talking heads on TV “news” channels, tend to be loud-mouthed know-it-alls on the political extremes who delight in their uninformed ignorance and spew disdain upon the rational among us who actually know what they’re talking about.
So what in the world are Democratic Rep. James Smith and Republican Rep. Ted Pitts doing writing a blog together? Not as point-counterpoint crazies, but as friends and colleagues providing an “issues-based political dialogue”?
Well, I can’t say for sure yet; they can’t either: They’ve been brainstorming the idea for the past week, and they’re going to lunch today to sketch out a plan. But I know it’s going to be interesting. It might even help break down some of the partisan barriers that are so poisoning our politics, our government and our society.
This may be a little bolder than the rest of the offerings, but what James and Ted are doing is typical of the approach you’ll find at TheColumbiaRecord.com, which debuts today as the Midlands’ on-line gathering place.
Like James and Ted, the folks who are already blogging are people who know what they’re talking about. And contrary to the other cliche about blogging, most of them have little or nothing to say about politics.
This is no accident. The team at The State who developed TheColumbiaRecord.com set out to create something different from the Wild West of the blogosphere, but also different from the typical newspaper site. We sought out people in our community who are experts in their fields — oftentimes fields that don’t get as much coverage in a newspaper as aficionados seek. We recruited some people you know. But we also realized that our community is full of interesting, intelligent, knowledgeable people whom most of us have never heard of, and so we went looking for them.
The first such person we found (with the help of State food reporter Allison Askins) was cookbook author and culinary instructor Susan Slack, who is now sharing her original recipes and her knowledge to help the rest of us learn to cook like a pro.
I knew Kathy Plowden had the personality to be a great blogger when she told me about how she had transformed herself from “the person who killed artificial plants” into a master gardener.
Arborist Jay Clingman heard about the project through word of mouth and contacted us with a full-blown proposal of how he would guide and moderate a dialogue on “trees and forests, timberland, wildlife preserves, wetlands, urban forests, tree problems and even tree and forest politics”; it was a topic we never would have thought to include on the blog site, but what he’s written so far is fun reading.
Actor/storyteller Darion McCloud, whom State reporter Pat Berman described as “among the most open, enjoyable and quotable people I’ve talked to in the past couple of years,” plans to talk about a bit of everything as he seeks to integrate the arts into modern life.
And the list goes on, from astronomy buff Hap Griffin and ultra-marathoner Ray Krolewicz to Lisa Yanity, a guidance counselor at A.C. Flora High School and Army Reserve captain who’s serving in Afghanistan, and Dr. Leo Walker, who is integrating non-traditional approaches with traditional medicine to help readers achieve “not merely the absence of disease but an optimum state of physical, mental, social and spiritual well-being.”
Of course, you’ll also find politics on TheColumbiaRecord.com, and readers of these pages will find familiar names: Three of the best writers from our old “community columnists” op-ed initiative — political consultant Bob McAlister, systems development specialist Mike Cakora and hydrologist Frank Chapelle — are blogging. (Go to the public square and find out, in his fabulous first posting, how Bob discovered that fellow blogger Brad Warthen isn’t into porn, or what Mike thinks of David Wilkins’ use of the queen’s English. Hint: Mike’s headline is “Did he really say that?”)
The site also includes Columbia City Council members Daniel Rickenmann and Tameika Isaac Devine, the Columbia Urban League’s J.T. McLawhorn and Brandy Pinkston, who runs the state Consumer Affairs Department and is offering tips and answering questions on scams, pitfalls and urban myths. And, as soon as they work out the details, James and Ted.
The blogs are just one part of TheColumbiaRecord.com. There’s also a place for people to send in their news about their schools, churches, neighborhoods, clubs, hobbies — whatever interests them. I think that’s going to create exciting and useful community conversations.
But that’s just what I think. What I know is that the bloggers are great. As we’ve read the early postings, my colleagues at work, and my new blogger friends, have come away time and time again amazed by the great writing and the thoughtfulness of the postings, and by what we’ve learned. It’s changed the way a lot of us think about blogging. I think it will do the same for you.
Ms. Scoppe can be reached at cscoppe@thestate.com or at (803) 771-8571.
“BLOGGERS, like the talking heads on TV “news” channels, tend to be loud-mouthed know-it-alls on the political extremes who delight in their uninformed ignorance and spew disdain upon the rational among us who actually know what they’re talking about.”
Gee, Brad, I wonder if Ms. Scoppe was thinking of you when she wrote that zinger. I certainly hope not. I certainly don’t think that characterization applies to you.
Nor do I think it applies to the best and most successful bloggers out there. Messrs. Hewitt, Reynolds, Hinderaker, Johnson, Mirengoff and Morrisey, as well as Ms. Malkin, all are certainly well informed, and none of them are political extremists. And they are certainly all better writers than Ms. Scoppe.
That first line of Ms. Scoppe’s piece betrayed her own ignorance of the blogosphere. After reading that line, I saw no need to continue reading. Once Ms. Scoppe showed how uninformed she is on blogs, what would be the point? In this case, Ms. Scoppe seems to be the one who is the “loud-mouthed know-it-all … who delight[s] in [her] uninformed ignorance and spew[s] disdain upon the rational among us…”.
I dunno, Mike. I’ve seen some pretty awful, thoughtless rants out there.
And maybe I SHOULD be included. I’m sure that would be some people’s assessment.
Brad
Welcome to the ranks of loud-mouthed know-it-alls who delight in uninformed ignorance and spew disdain upon the rational among us 🙂
“John, you’re so full of stinky stuff.”
http://swampfoxinsights.blogspot.com/2005/08/something-is-stirring-were-at.html
(Scoll down to the comment at the bottom.)
After being written off, “So long, I will not read your crap any more,” a few days later the reader came back.
“WEll, John you’ve done it again.”
http://swampfoxinsights.blogspot.com/2005/08/inez-and-culture-of-innovation-in.html
(Again see the comment at the bottom.)
I’m sure no one reacts to what you write this way.
Ms. Scoppe’s attack on bloggers reeks of insecurity. And ignorance. I’d say “uninformed ignorance” like she did, but that’s redundant. Sure her description captures the essence of some, even many, blogs out there, and I’ll be the first to confess that my blog has featured the occasional rash, unenlightened, borderline vitriolic entry, but Ms. Scoppe’s assertion that bloggers “tend” to be this way–“tend” indicating more often than not–is simply unfair. The role of the bloggers’ POV in the amorphous media of today cannot be understated. Ask Dan Rather. Or former NYT Editor Howell Raines.
A BA in Journalism and a working knowledge of the AP rules are no longer necessary to be published or to be respected as a credible source of commentary, Ms. Scoppe. You might check out some of the well-written, insightful blogs we have right here in the SC contingency of the blogosphere, like Tim Kelly’s or Jeff Quinton’s.
Laurin Manning
The LaurinLine
I dunno, but I saw Scoppe’s opening as just a way to open a column, no offense intended or anything like that.
But, you all have made me reconsider. She should have written something like:
Ennui or languor? You decide!
Well, at least you said “op-ed pages,” which excludes us editorial board types.
Speaking of which, though, let me be a hoary old (oops, that’s redundant, isn’t it?) arrogant twit and say to Laurin that one generally does have to accomplish a BIT more than a BA in journalism and knowledge of AP style to get a traditional job writing opinion. I mean, that will get you an entry-level job at a paper a lot smaller than this one, if you’re lucky.
You have to put in a lot of time — preferably 10 years or more — developing some expertise in the subject area you’re going to be dealing with. And not just put in the time, but distinguish oneself.
OR you can just impress the right person at precisely the right moment the way I did.
You have to put in a lot of time — preferably 10 years or more — developing some expertise in the subject area you’re going to be dealing with.
I supose that in Ms. Scoppe’s case her area of expertise would be what is described on The State’s Opinion home page:
Cindi Ross Scoppe is an associate editor. She covers the S.C. General Assembly and state government.
I don’t doubt that Ms. Scoppe is very knowledgeable about the General Assembly and state government. She appears to know far less about the blogosphere. Perhaps she should keep her published commentary within her own bailiwick.
Brad,
Certainly didn’t mean to undermine the credibility of the fine editorial staff at The State. I know that you and Ms. Scoppe are duly qualified for your respective positions. However, I daresay the time and effort you’ve spent maintaining this blog attest to your understanding of the power of the blog movement…