There are funny parts to being unemployed. One of my very favorites are the e-mails I get almost daily from mysterious addresses that announce “West Columbia Vice President/Editorial Page Editor Jobs.”
Then, of course, you follow the link and find that, alas, “The search for Vice President/Editorial Page Editor jobs in 29169 did not match any jobs.”
Welcome to the brave new world of computerized hiring. Apparently, somehow my title from the newspaper got stripped off a resume from one of the many jobs I’ve applied for online, and some service that someone is trying to sell me automatically plugs it into a database and just as automatically sends me this absurd e-mail, over and over again. And wonder of wonders, not once has there actually been a job for a vice president/editorial page editor in West Columbia a single time in the past year. If you can believe that.
You know, if ever an actual human intervened in that algorithm for two seconds, he’d say, Hmmm. There are probably no more than a handful of editorial page editors who are also vice presidents in the entire country, if any. Seems kinda doubtful that West Columbia, which doesn’t even house a single daily newspaper, would ever, ever have one.
But things like that don’t happen. In my experience, actual humans probably only look at applications before the first cut a little under 50 percent of the time these days. And that’s the unfunny side of computerized hiring. If you’re me, if you’re a guy whose specialty is leading a small, talented team in wrestling with the knottier public policy issues of the day (plus dealing with community and business and political leaders), you pretty much know that no algorithm ever written can look at my resume and infer the kinds of conclusions that might lead someone to think, OK, I don’t have any newspaper jobs open, but a guy with this kind of background could probably do this and this for me…
Only a human could possibly do that. So it’s pretty galling to get those notices, about an hour after applying, that say “We’ve examined your resume and concluded that you are not a good fit for us.” When you know it’s a machine.
My all-time favorite was a job that I heard about on the day before the deadline for applications. I rushed to get it in, complete with a thoughtful cover letter, etc. Hours later I got a message saying that my resume had been examined, and my qualifications looked like a good match, and they would be following up with me. This was very encouraging because it was an opportunity I was pretty excited about, and I was relieved to know I’d gotten in under the wire and would have the chance to make my case. It was obvious that the notice was computer-generated, that no human had yet seen my application, but I was thinking, Good software; must have been written by a real genius.
Then, three days later, I get another automated e-mail telling me that on further examination, I wasn’t such a good fit. And mind you, a human obviously hadn’t seen it yet. (Bad software, must have been written by an EVIL genius…)
So I got ticked off and started digging, asking around, getting names that led me to names, until I finally found a human who would sit down and chat with me. (My argument was that I didn’t think they’d want anyone who’d take “no” from a machine.) I didn’t get the job, but I was satisfied that I at least got to a human…
Dunno– I get tons of ads on the side of web pages for corporate lawyers, and I haven’t ever posted any resume online….
I have gotten my best jobs from networks.
Well, yeah. HELL, yeah, to put it more colloquially. From the begin of my search, I assumed that when I got a job, the offer would probably come from someone who already knew me.
But in the meantime, you don’t just ignore jobs that you see that you have to apply for online. Might as well touch all the bases, try everything you can. You can’t wait forever for your friends, acquaintances and distant admirers to come up with a job for you. Mamanem gotta eat, you know…
You’re exactly right, Brad. From someone who was unemployed for over a year, I can tell you first hand that when hiring managers actually take the time to vet candidates themselves [early on in the process], the returned value grows exponentially — for the candidate and for the potential employer. I, like you, became accustomed to battling automated systems and hearing no continually. I’m confident that you’ll land on your feet. Afterall… You’re Brad Warthen
Hang in there.
Look, everyone always wonders why someone with all my fabulous writing, speaking, whatever skills cannot just find the perfect job. I know.
First problem is that every employer says he or she wants someone who can write, speak, manage, etc., but they really don’t seem to after all. They want someone with exactly the right number of years of experience, the right salary history, a technical-field degree and an Ivy League MBA….
Even before digital resume filtering, I think far too many employers turned off their brains…
You hit it on the head, Nicholas. Not only is automated screening bad for the applicant, I truly believe it ill-serves the potential employer. If they really surrender the initial screen (and even subsequent screens) to an algorithm, they’re missing out.
Particularly when you consider that the kinds of jobs I’m applying for call for a certain intuitive judgment — the jobs themselves call for that, and any intelligent assessment of the applicant’s suitability call for it, too. It’s not like they’re looking for someone familiar with X, Y and Z applications who has a chauffer’s license. They’re looking for qualities that are a bit harder than that to pin down, and no set on online questions can get at those qualities…
Did you see this?
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/04/business/retirementspecial/04WORK.html?em