I disenfranchised myself for ONE positive vote, and it was worth it

On the day of the Republican presidential primary in January 2008, I dropped by the office to check on things, and wandered through the newsroom to see what they knew, if anything.

I was wearing one of those “I Voted” stickers that the Palmetto Project gives out to encourage civic engagement. I’ve always proudly worn one on election days as a visible symbol of being one who cares enough to make the effort, without revealing anything inappropriate (for a newspaper editor) about how I voted.

But John Monk remarked upon it, saying, “I see you voted Republican.” Dang! I had completely forgotten the insane fact that the parties had insisted upon having separate primaries a week apart (yet another reason to hate parties). Flustered, I just said, “Well, of course I did.” If I had thought there was any danger of Barack Obama losing the Democratic primary, I would have had a dilemma on my hands. But while I thought McCain would win the GOP contest, I wasn’t sure of it, and I was damned if I was going to fail to do my bit to prevent my state from committing the travesty it had in 2000, when it gave George W. Bush to the world. It just had never occurred to me not to vote in that primary.

Of course, if you live in the Quail Hollow precinct in Lexington County, you’re accustomed to voting in Republican primaries, if only because that’s the only way you get any choices at all. This morning when I asked for a Democratic ballot, I could not remember ever having done so before since I’ve lived there.

And of course, as a result of taking that ballot, I was disenfranchised in terms of who will be my congressman, my lieutenant governor, my treasurer, my attorney general, my SC House member, and my county councilman. In every one of those, there was no Democratic contest, and in two of them (treasurer and county council) no Democrat at all; in those two this WAS the election (and in several of the others it might as well be).

But it was worth it to cast a positive vote. Yeah, I guess I could have held my nose and hoped that Henry McMaster would govern the way he has served as attorney general, rather than the way he has run as a candidate, and thereby minimized Nikki’s margin of victory. But by taking a Democratic ballot, I actually got to vote for someone I actually want to be my governor, without any reservations. And as I’ve said over and over again, electing the right governor is FAR more important than what happens with any other office. We have got to turn this state around, and as weak as the office of governor is, it’s the one office with a bully enough pulpit to make a difference. No matter how perfect my House member may be, he’s just one vote out of 170, and can’t make news (and thereby influence policy) with a mere word.

And I feel good about it. After all the slime we’ve been dragged through over on the Republican side, from talk about who’s bedding whom to “Vultures” to … well, I just don’t even want to think about it. After all that, to vote positively, without reservation, was a great relief.

3 thoughts on “I disenfranchised myself for ONE positive vote, and it was worth it”

  1. Doug Ross

    “A Washington Post-ABC News poll released Tuesday found that 69 percent of people say they are either dissatisfied or angry with the government, and 60 percent say they are inclined to look for other candidates in November — the most ever in a Post-ABC poll.”

    At some point you have to realize that being positive won’t fix the problem. If 69% of the people think the government is broken, it’s not the people who need an attitude adjustment, it’s the politicians who need a career change.

  2. Ralph Hightower

    Yea, it would be great if we could pick and choose the individual offices, whether to vote Republican or Democrat.
    But that won’t happen. In fact voting in either primary could get much worse!

    The South Carolina GOP party and Greenville County GOP party have filed a lawsuit to prohibit anyone but registered supporters, i.e., Republicans, to vote in their primary.
    http://www.thestate.com/2010/06/03/1315159/sc-gop-suit-seeks-party-registration.html

    Independents and Democrats won’t be allowed to vote in the Republican Party if the lawsuit is successful.

    There could be a “work-around” if the SC Democrat party allows anyone to vote, independents or Republicans, in their primary. That would nullify the GOP registration requirement; only registered Democrats wouldn’t be eligible to vote in the GOP primary. Just register as Republican to be eligible to vote in the GOP primary and the Democrat primary, if the Democrats welcome everybody.

    Frankly, the State and Greenville County GOP parties just represent total arrogance.

Comments are closed.