Live-blogging the Charleston debate

The stakes are huge, with Mitt Romney and Newt Gingrich running neck-and-neck in the polls.

Let’s see what happens with the Final Four…

100 thoughts on “Live-blogging the Charleston debate

  1. Brad

    Astounding! Both Romney and Paul, after milking this by noting how long they’ve been married, join Mitt in pretending this isn’t a legit character issue. Wow.

    Reply
  2. Brad

    Mark, you’re right. But the Spiro Agnew routine we got from Newt was ridiculous. Can you say “nattering nabobs?” And the crowd roars…

    Reply
  3. Mark Stewart

    Too bad the candidates laud the Veterans Administration but despise Obamacare. Not saying don’t do more for veterans, just amazed at the choice of models.

    Reply
  4. Brad

    Santorum: The most important issue facing the nation is “the robbing of our freedom” under Obamacare. Well, we know HE has no sense of proportion…

    Reply
  5. Brad

    One problem with live-blogging, especially when you’re watching it on the computer, is that you don’t SEE them. Hope I’m not missing too much.

    Reply
  6. Brad

    I thought about going to Charleston for this, but dreaded going all that way and getting stuck in a press room with wi-fi problems, unable to blog. That happened to me once this week already. It bites…

    Reply
  7. Brad

    Really? Romney’s running for the GOP nomination, and wished he had talked more about Obama? That’s what he always does, when he can get away with it…

    Reply
  8. SusanG

    Oh – I didn’t like his response. I thought it sounds like someone who’s lost — I think it was the “I just feel lucky to be in the final four” part.

    Reply
  9. Mark Stewart

    Disagree. People want a larger than life President who can maintain the facade of leadership. Aw shucks is for congressmen.

    Reply
  10. Brad

    Oh, you’re right, Mark… The last couple of weeks, I keep thinking I like Santorum more than the others. But I can’t picture him as president.

    Reply
  11. Mark Stewart

    Nobody but a psychopath is anti-life. This is such a downer. At least Paul isn’t completely out of touch. He’s just wrong.

    Reply
  12. Brad

    Doug, maybe you wouldn’t put it the way I did, but haven’t you said you want to bring the troops home from all over the world, and reinforce the border? Do I malign you, or Paul, by saying that?

    Reply
  13. Brad

    I said, “scary Mexican.” Is it racist to say, “scary Nazis.” I think they were scary. Unlike many of my friends, I don’t see the Mexican influx as a big threat. Nothing about racism in that…

    Reply
  14. Brad

    Dang it! My wife says he finished well, too. I missed it because I was too busy arguing with Doug. I spend a lot of time doing that. Dang…

    What did he say?

    Reply
  15. doug ross

    Your comment is a lie from start to finish. The “only” reason Paul wants the army to exist? You know that is untrue. He never said anything about Mexicans. To imply he is afraid of Mexicans is you projecting your desire to paint people who want to enforce laws as racists. Even Lindsey Graham learner that was a dumb strategy.

    Reply
  16. Brad

    Hmmm. He was talking about the Rio Grande. Specifically. Near as I recall, that is NOT the border with Canada.

    But Doug, I just hate it that you and I get into these snits. This morning I was bugged that you were representing me. Now you’re upset because you say I’m misrepresenting Paul. I regret that. I hate that we have such acrimonious arguments. You’re a good guy, and I hate that that happens…

    Reply
  17. Scout

    You definitely miss something if you can’t see their facial expressions. It was interesting to see Newt looking smug and disgusted and Santorum looking righteously indignant as they took each other’s responses apart.

    Reply
  18. john boudreaux

    I thought Santorum did score with a strong closing statement. Romney was on the defence a goodly part of the night but a terrible answer on tax returns. Newt was an expectantly over dramatic…probably has strong chance on Saturday if most voters are men….but I think he can kiss the women vote good by. Paul a well rounded conservative is probably UN electable because of age. in our generational demographic. How do you project a Saturday winner and whoever he is can he win going forward ??

    Reply
  19. Steve Gordy

    Is it a requirement that GOP hopefuls diss their parents to show how tough or capable they are? I still wince at W’s talk of “a higher father” before he launched the Iraq War. Now Mitt says he’s a self-made man. Didn’t George Romney have something to do with that?

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *