SC and the media: They shoot editors, don’t they?

This morning I was on Tom Finneran’s Boston radio show for the second time this week (Tom is the former speaker of the Massachusetts House; I met him in Key West last week), and was asked what the nation should make of the roar of approval that Newt Gingrich got last night when he blamed the media for bringing to light his second ex-wife’s allegations.

I explained that historically, the media got off light on that one. Playing to resentment to those “nattering nabobs of negativism” in the media is of course an old Republican pasttime across the country. But in South Carolina, it can get you everywhere.

Getting away with asking for an open marriage is nothing. This is a ploy that will enable you to get away with murder.

Literally.

So I regaled the Boston audience with the tale of N.G. Gonzales and James H. Tillman. Most of you know the story, but for those who don’t…

N.G. and his brother founded The State in 1891 for a specific purpose: to oppose the Ben Tillman machine. N.G. wrote the editorials, which lambasted the Tillmanites with a vehemence that would shock most newspaper readers in my lifetime, but which was par for the course in those days.

One of the targets of editorial vitriol was James H. Tillman, Ben’s nephew. James was the lieutenant governor, and aspired to be governor. N.G. wasn’t having it, and criticized him heavily during the 1902 campaign. Tillman lost. Not long after that, on January 15, 1903, N.G. was walking home for lunch. The newspaper office then was on Main St., and Gonzales had to turn the corner of Main and Gervais to get home. As he approached the corner, Tillman headed his way, coming from the Senate side of the State House with a couple of senators.

Tillman went straight up to Gonzales, drew a gun, and shot him in cold blood. He did this in the presence of many witnesses, including a policeman.

As N.G. fell, he cried, “Shoot again, you coward!” As one who inherited his mission of writing editorials for The State, I’ve always been proud of him for that.

He died four days later.

Tillman was arrested and charged with the murder, of course, but the defense obtained a change of venue to the friendlier Lexington County. A strategy of self-defense was attempted, but didn’t seem to be getting anywhere. Then,  the defense entered N.G.’s editorials into evidence.

The jury acquitted Tillman. The ostensible reason was self-defense, but since there was nothing to support that — Gonzales was unarmed and not threatening Tillman in any way — it has always been assumed that the jury let him off because the son-of-a-bitch editor had it comin’.

A postscript:

Early in 2003, a number of events were held to mark the centennial of Gonzales’ murder. At one point, Solicitor Donnie Myers, an avid student of the case, was asked to present his popular lecture on the subject to employees of The State. I introduced him, and stood to the side as he enthusiastically launched into it.

At the critical point in the narrative, channeling Tillman, Donnie reached dramatically into his briefcase and, pulling out a .45 automatic pistol, brandished it menacingly in my direction. Me being the editor.

I grinned at him, enjoying his act (I had seen it before). But our then-publisher, Ann Caulkins, who admitted to a greater-than-usual fear of firearms of all sorts, practically gasped aloud. She later admitted that for a split second there, she actually feared the solicitor was going to shoot me.

If that had happened, it wouldn’t have been the first time.

15 thoughts on “SC and the media: They shoot editors, don’t they?

  1. Brad

    By the way, sorry I hadn’t posted today before this. I’ve been interviewed by out-of-state media four times today (this, a Southern California public radio station, Canadian public radio, NBC), went to a Santorum event (more to come on that), and spent time messing with Skype to get ready for an interview tonight with PBS World.

    But now, I’m back. For the next couple of hours, anyway…

    Reply
  2. `Kathryn Fenner

    If you can’t win on the facts, deflect. A popular deflection is to blame the messenger.

    The media don’t make the news; they just report it.

    Reply
  3. David Carlton

    “The ostensible reason was self-defense, but since there was nothing to support that — Gonzales was unarmed and not threatening Tillman in any way . . . .”

    Actually, there was–It was a chilly day, and Gonzales was walking *with his hands in his pockets.* Wouldn’t you be scared?

    Reply
  4. Steven Davis

    “Donnie reached dramatically into his briefcase and, pulling out a .45 automatic pistol, brandished it menacingly in my direction.”

    So he pointed a gun at you in front of witnesses? What an idiot, and I believe you could have filed charges against him for doing so. I’m sure he triple-checked that it was “unloaded”. Most accidental shootings are with unloaded weapons.

    Point a gun at me and I’ll beat you half to death with it.

    Reply
  5. Steven Davis

    BTW – I had a high school friend die because of an “unloaded” gun, which is one reason I don’t take much humor in people pointing guns (loaded or unloaded) at anything they don’t intend to kill.

    And I’m not joking about the beating part.

    Reply
  6. Mab

    Steven — I really, really can’t figure you out. You are an enigma. Maybe you should enter politics like Ron Paul, who has been described as one regarding why he “mysteriously” appeals to young voters. [It is no mystery.]

    ###

    Only lawyers who threaten to (and do) nail other people for “pointing and presenting” can get away with “pointing and presenting.”

    Reply
  7. `Kathryn Fenner

    I’m sorry about your friend, Steven. I agree–guns are not stage props or toys, and should be treated with greater respect.

    Reply
  8. Steven Davis

    Isn’t Donnie Mayer also that nice guy who gave that woman in Charleston a ride home a few years ago and got pulled over and charged with DUI?

    Reply
  9. Mab

    Steven — you may be fusing two separate individuals: Donnie Myers/John Mayer (not the singer).

    They do, however, actively participate in each other’s proxy wars.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *