Graham: ‘Hillary Clinton got away with murder’

Our senior senator is just all over the place this week, to the point I’m having trouble keeping up with him.

FIrst, he and John McCain are in bipartisan moderate mode as they attempt to revive the issue that almost did McCain in (and did Graham a world of hurt back home) the last time they tried it. Then we see him trying to hold his base at bay by standing up against gun control (here’s video of that, which his office put out today).

Somehow in all this, I missed that he said the following words yesterday on FoxNews:

I haven’t forgotten about Benghazi. Hillary Clinton got away with murder, in my view.

Somehow this escaped me until some friends mentioned it this afternoon. The way I heard it was “Lindsey Graham said Hillary Clinton got away with murder in Benghazi.”

Now when you look at what he said in context, it’s not nearly that bad. He didn’t say she “got away with murder” in Benghazi. It seems pretty clear that he was just saying she got off too easy in the hearings last week.

But still.

That he would use words that could be (and of course, would be) misconstrued that way — especially with a clip as short and context-free as this one on Politico — is remarkable given that this is Hillary Clinton we’re talking about. Yes, there are those in Mr. Graham’s base who may consider her a she-devil of some sort, but Lindsey Graham and Hillary Clinton have long formed a well-known mutual admiration society. Each has only had kind things to say about the other since their early days in the Senate together, and each has used the other to prop up his and her bipartisan cred.

That he would rhetorically throw her under the bus (just to use another common expression) this way is surprising.

I mean, come on, Lindsey — the lady just got out of the hospital

19 thoughts on “Graham: ‘Hillary Clinton got away with murder’

  1. tired old man

    The man is absolutely demented. Does he feel compelled to fill the wecome vacuum created by Jim Demint’s departure?

    Reply
  2. Brad Warthen Post author

    Some in the liberal zones of the blogosphere are bemused by all of this. From Steve Benen at Rachel Maddow’s blog:

    Sen. Lindsey Graham’s (R-S.C.) approach to September’s deadly attack in Benghazi has gotten a little out of hand. Indeed, in some corners, it’s become a running joke — Lindsey Graham is considering putting a hold on the Super Bowl until he gets answers on Benghazi. Lindsey Graham doesn’t want anyone to finish the third season of Downton Abbey until he gets answers on Benghazi. Lindsey Graham won’t let me have breakfast until he gets answers on Benghazi.

    But even though Benen found the “murder” comment “disturbing,” he went on to acknowledge that it wasn’t quite as bad as it sounded:

    Now, I realize “get away with murder” is a common figure of speech, not a literal accusation of homicide. I’m going to hope that the Republican meant that the outgoing Secretary of State “got away with” doing something wrong, not actually killing someone.

    Then he adds, with justice:

    That said, when we’re dealing with a crisis in which four Americans were actually murdered, perhaps the senator could have chosen his words more carefully.

    Reply
  3. Doug Ross

    posturing: present participle of pos·ture (Verb)

    Verb

    Behave in a way that is intended to impress or mislead others.
    Adopt (an attitude) to impress or mislead.

    There’s a photo of Lindsey right next to the definition.

    Reply
    1. Steven Davis II

      Do she or her husband realize they’re nothing more than pawns in all of this? I realize they like the media attention, but their opinions are not any more important than any other person’s.

      Reply
  4. tired old man

    Taking Graham somewhat at face value — that Hilliary got away with murder in the face of a Senate hearing — is not that an insipid slap at his buddy McCain? After all, McCain sat there and fired blanks at the secretary of state. Is Graham saying McCain LET her get away with murder? Is Graham a few beers short of a six pack? I cannot get over the absolute collapse in the man as he turns away from his moderate, almost-statesman posture and becomes yet another political lunatic from South Carolina. It is sad to watch.

    Reply
  5. Burl Burlingame

    It can’t be easy to be Graham. On one hand, you’re supposed to be sane, reasonable and statesmanlike; on the other hand, you represent South Carolina.

    Reply
  6. bud

    Graham is right. It is well documented that Hillary, along with husband Bill, brutally murdered Vince Foster. And now this crazed woman is on a rampage killing our consolate staff, including the ambassodor. She must be stopped now before she kills again! How many more must die before this lunatic is locked up for good?

    Reply
  7. Karen McLeod

    I am so sorry to see this once rational man deteriorate into political insanity. But no, I can’t vote for him again; I can’t trust him.

    Reply
  8. Juan Caruso

    I will gladly vote for Graham’s Democrat challenger, especially if said challenger is a lawyer named Sheheen. The problem is that too few voters understand either Sen. Graham’s deceitfulness or that lobbyists not only influence our government, they can make or break those elected to represent us.

    Reply
  9. bud

    Doug/Juan, I don’t think Lindsey is overly deceiptful nor do I especially think he’s a political opportunist. At least not in the extreme. I think Lindsey just plain buys into this neo-con all-war, all-the-time philosophy. Perhaps he ramps up the rhetoric a bit in the run-up to the election but seriously does anyone really still believe this man has one iota worth of reasonable thinking when it comes to foreign affairs, the military and especially Israel?

    Reply
    1. Brad Warthen Post author

      Yes, I do. Completely. No one comes closer to my way of looking at those things than he and McCain.

      And let’s be clear — Hillary Clinton isn’t all that far from their positions on those things, although I’d still go with McCain and Graham. And Lieberman, whom I miss.

      Reply
  10. Brad Warthen Post author

    Speaking of which, it was nice to see Sam Nunn pop up at the Hagel hearing yesterday. Although I have to confess that I had a similar thought to one Tweet I saw from someone who admitted she didn’t know he was still alive.

    He’s not only alive, but he’s out there fighting nuclear proliferation…

    Reply
  11. Ralph Hightower

    Fox News: Fair and Balanced?

    Just political posturing. Lindsey ihas a target on his back from former Senator Jim Demint funding Republican or Tea Bagger challengers from his multi-million job at a think tank.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *