Speaking of people who sort of seem like they’re running for higher office, here’s the latest missive from Mia McLeod:
Well…ladies & gentlemen, it’s time to “weigh-in.” And unlike her Republican counterparts in New Jersey, Florida, Arizona, Nevada, Ohio, New Mexico, North Dakota and Michigan, your Governor is once again “flexing” her Tea Party muscles and refusing to support healthcare coverage for uninsured South Carolinians.
So what separates her from a growing list of anti-Obama Governors who have recently decided to expand Medicaid in other states? Common sense and compassion, for starters.
And if South Carolina refuses to expand healthcare coverage, here’s a glimpse of the impact on hard-working folks like you:
Higher medical costs – as the uninsured forego preventive care and are forced to seek medical care in the emergency room, hospitals will be forced to shift those costs to insured individuals and employers.
Less independence – as our seniors, veterans and disabled citizens forfeit access to home health and other medical care, it’ll be extremely difficult for them to lead independent lives.
Fewer options – as our state refuses federal funding to the tune of 100% for the first 3 years, neighboring states will gladly accept and use our federal tax dollars to cover their uninsured.
Poor quality of life – as hard-working folks forfeit medical care they need to live longer, healthier lives, our state misses opportunities to be more proactive, productive and economically sound.
But this is South Carolina. Obviously, expanding Medicaid makes sense, but don’t take my word for it. Here’s what Republican Governors (in other states, of course) are saying…
“No mother or father should despair over whether or not they can afford — or access — the health care their child needs. Quality health care services must be accessible and affordable for all — not just those in certain zip codes or tax brackets,” said outspoken Obamacare critic and Florida Governor, Rick Scott, as he reflected on the death of his mother and her struggle to raise five children with little money, while worrying constantly about having family health coverage.
Arizona Governor Jan Brewer also made national headlines when she supported Medicaid expansion, acknowledging that it would lessen the impact of uncompensated care that drives up medical costs to hospitals and taxpayers.
New Jersey Governor Chris Christie has said, “Let me be clear, I’m no fan of the Affordable Care Act…” but it’s “now the law of the land,” acknowledging that rejecting it would mean that New Jersey’s tax dollars will be spent elsewhere.
While Nevada Governor Brian Sandoval was the first Republican governor to officially embrace Medicaid expansion, his decision seemed to be based primarily upon the recognition that it wouldn’t be wise to forego an infusion of federal dollars into his state’s economy.
The same is true for South Carolina. Are you listening, Governor Haley? (Oops! rhetorical question…)
Expanding healthcare coverage to people who can’t otherwise afford it should be a no-brainer. States can opt-in or out at anytime, “risk-free” for the first 3 years. That’s an offer Republican Governors across the nation believe is too good to refuse, because while expanding healthcare coverage is voluntary, picking up the tab for the uninsured, isn’t.
Our Governor has said that SC can’t afford to expand Medicaid. With 100% federal funding for the first 3 years and 90% thereafter, how can we afford not to? It creates over 40,000 jobs, covers over 250,000 uninsured South Carolinians, infuses our state’s economy and improves our quality of life and health.
So while she focuses on restricting foods purchased using federally funded programs like WIC and SNAP (in the name of obesity prevention) or “disease” designations for obesity, here’s an idea…
Let’s expand healthcare coverage so that South Carolinians who struggle with obesity and other medical conditions can get quality, affordable healthcare that focuses on prevention and treatment to help them live longer, healthier, more productive lives.
This isn’t a partisan issue. We all want the strongest military, the best schools, quality, affordable health care, meaningful job opportunities and the ability to live, work and age with dignity. Part of government’s role is to help ensure that every citizen has access to healthcare because a healthier population is a huge, proactive step towards a stronger workforce and business community, improved quality of life and more vibrant economy.
South Carolina is only as strong as its weakest. If our state’s leaders lack the collective compassion and courage to expand healthcare coverage to “the least of these,” the biggest losers won’t just be the uninsured. South Carolinians, insured and uninsured, will pay the ultimate price. Our state will be the biggest loser. But wait…isn’t that what we’ve been since we elected her 3 years ago?
Governor Haley was elected to represent all of us. The sooner she and her party’s leaders “swallow that pill,” the healthier we’ll all be…
Much too sensible to survive in South Carolina.
I hope she runs against Sheheen first and then Nikki (if she survives HER primary).
I may not agree with her on the Medicaid expansion but she is far more effective at communicating than the other two.
So the House passed a $22.7 billion dollar budget and there was the typical wailing and gnashing of teeth from Democrats. They felt so strongly about the Medicaid expansion issue that they refused to vote to pass the budget, displaying Rand Paul-like conviction to the cause.
Oh, wait, no they didn’t. The budget passed 116-1. Talk is apparently very cheap in the Democratic Party.
The budget passed 116-1, even with Todd Rutherford pouting like a spoiled 3 year old… even though he voted for the budget as presented.
I don’t think I’d vote against the entire state budget because it didn’t contain something I thought it should. If make my views known during the debate, and on preliminary votes.
Unless, I suppose, if I had the votes to stop it long enough to get what was missing put in. But then I’d be winning the preliminary votes, and it would be in there…
If you vote FOR something, you approve of it. The one guy who voted NO has more backbone than the rest of the Democrats combined. With a 116-1 vote, the message is clear: We are united in our belief that this is the best budget for the state of South Carolina.
Explain this one to me, please. Apparently the funding in the budget for K-12 education was about $2100 per child yet state law says it must be $2600. What’s the point of having laws if they aren’t enforced? This is like the voting machine law that was ignored in Richland 2. Why don’t they just strike all those laws off the books if they aren’t real?
We’ve got a State House full of lawyers yet they can’t seem to follow the laws they created.
Well, if one guy said it, it MUST be true.
@Doug – You’re learning the secrets of being a Democrat.