This seems a natural followup to our discussion the other day about how American and British accents — human accents — diverged.
I didn’t listen to it until today, although it was brought to my attention yesterday by Professor Elemental. Let this be a lesson to you that when the Professor recommends something, one should drop everything and attend to it immediately, because otherwise one is missing out unnecessarily.
It’s a podcast in which Sir Patrick Stewart answers an American listener’s question regarding whether British cows moo differently — or rather, whether British people moo differently when imitating cows. (Although his answer speaks more to the first question.)
Sir Patrick answered the question thoroughly and respectfully. His answer, in part:
“It’s not a straight-forward, simple answer unlike, probably, many other country where a cow’s moo is a cow’s moo. In England, you understand, we are dominated by class, by social status, and by location. So, for example, a cow that is in the field next to my house in West Oxfordshire would moo in one kind of way, and a cow in a field in the semi-industrial town I grew up in in the North of England would moo in another kind of way….
Well, if I were at home in West Oxfordshire right now and I walked down my lane and there were all these cows and I say, ‘Hi, good morning, cows. And they would moo at me like this: ‘Mooooooouhh.’ Now that’s a very conservative moo…”
You should listen to the whole thing (the “listen” button is at the bottom of the post). Or at least, as the site recommends, don’t stop before he gets to the Cockney moo…
Related Posts
Too silly
Oh, but I love it because as silly as it is, he applies himself to it with earnest diligence.
It’s so dry, and therefore droll…
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Colonel_(Monty_Python)
T’isn’t
Theatre of the absurd.
Speaking of Patrick Stewart…
On my very last trip to the deeply lamented Barnes & Noble on Harbison, I didn’t just drink coffee, but spent a gift card on two items — a copy of Guns, Germs and Steel, and a DVD of “Excalibur” that was marked down to $4.99.
I hadn’t seen the Arthur movie in years and years, and was interested to see two people who later became famous — Liam Neeson, as Gawain, and Patrick Stewart, as Leondegrance, the father of Guinevere…
A goofy film in many ways (weirdest touch — when all the Round Table knights’ armor suddenly becomes mirror-shiny), but at least as good as any other film version of Arthurian legend. Frankly, I don’t think the story has ever gotten the treatment it deserves…
I’d love to see a really well-done series, on PBS or HBO or whatever, based on The Once and Future King. That would be great…
Monty Python and the Holy Grail forever!
Well, yes, that’s certainly the most ENJOYABLE version.
But being the retro, medieval guy that I am, I’d like to see a treatment of the legend that takes it seriously and is respectful to it, rather than mocking it.
That’s why I’d choose the T.H. White version to film. It’s written from a modern perspective, but with affection and respect for the characters and story.
Of course, the Python version not only mocks medieval romanticism, it has fun at the expense of anarcho-syndicalist communes as well…
Dennis’ explanation of how the commune makes executive decisions sort of reminds me of the Occupy movement, except that Occupy was more ridiculous, trying to function without leaders at all…
As I said at the time:
And where is Occupy now?