Well, yeah — there might be offshore drilling if we FIND something

The Conservation Voters of South Carolina are upset about oil and gas exploration off the SC coast:

Sonic cannons: Is offshore drilling next?

Conservation Voters,

On Friday, the federal government announced its approval for use of sonic cannons to search for oil and gas in the Atlantic Ocean, from Delaware to Florida. Sonic cannons blast loud noises underwater, disturbing marine mammals, including the endangered North American Right Whale. This method of exploration has serious impacts, and it is the first step to drilling off our coast.

Past projections indicate too little oil and gas, too much risk and too little benefit for South Carolinians. We have serious concerns about the use of sonic cannons in our waters despite the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management’s (BOEM) “mitigation measures.” The fact that BOEM will not share the results of the studies compounds our misgivings. This process is as opaque as our waters will be if there’s drilling offshore.

Regardless of the results, the fundamental geology of our coastline suggests that offshore oil and gas would be a drop in the bucket, especially with our country’s exploding natural gas production. These are global commodities, and any oil or gas produced off our coast would not lead to lower energy costs here.

We urge Governor Haley to reject the “drill, baby, drill” rhetoric of the past.  We disagree with her assessment that drilling could be a “tremendous boon to South Carolina.”  Instead, we ask state leaders to support clean energy policies that bring jobs and lower power bills, without the risks that we saw so vividly in the BP Gulf Oil disaster. We cannot turn our coast into an industrial zone for oil companies’ profits and federal government royalties. Converting McClellanville, Pawleys Island, or Beaufort into a home for large refineries and industrial-scale natural gas infrastructure would imperil the tourism and fishing industries that sustain these special places.

Stay tuned.We’ll be following this issue closely in the months to come.

The answer to the question, “Is offshore drilling next?,” would seem to be Yeah — if we find anything that makes the effort worthwhile.

I’m a tree-hugger from way back — I participated in the first Earth Day when I was in high school — but I’m also founder of the Energy Party, and that means I’m going to have to hear more arguments before I’m opposed to this exploration off our coast (although the “sonic cannon” bit does sound a little wild).

The point isn’t “lower energy costs.” The point is energy independence. And unless you have a plan for us to be independent and stay independent without exploring for oil — because until hydrogen cars or some other breakthrough are here and mass-produced and affordable, our economy is going to need oil — then we need to go get it where we can find it. And that requires looking for it first.

5 thoughts on “Well, yeah — there might be offshore drilling if we FIND something

  1. Juan Caruso

    I wonder if Conservation Voters (CVs) are as adamant about the incremental energy consumption by illegal immigrants . If not, why not — do CVs consider the impact a) negligible, b) politically incorrect, or c) both?
    ANS: c)

    Occasional sonic cannon echoes are imperceptibly destructive to the environment and compared to resident illegal immigrants involve a probability of greater medium-term benefit to civilization than burden to taxpayers.

  2. Norm Ivey

    “These are global commodities, and any oil or gas produced off our coast would not lead to lower energy costs here.”

    This is the point that is so often missed in these debates. Oil and gas recovered in our waters could easily end up being sold to China, Europe or South America. The real advantage to South Carolinians would be job creation, and the potential for job creation would be just as great with an emphasis on developing offshore wind farms or tidal power plants without the damaging effects of pumping more carbon into the atmosphere.

      1. bud

        Brad do you have figures to back up that claim, or is this one of those “intuition based” claims.

        Actually it’s not either/or. We could explore for oil AND put up wind turbines so once the oil runs out as it most assuredly will there will still be something in place to generate electricity.

        I would be opposed to the oil drilling on environmental grounds. Has everyone forgotten about the BP spill already? Aside from that type of blockbuster event there are countless smaller spills that occur all the time. Those don’t get reported but they still foul the environment.

      2. Norm Ivey

        But it’s not necessarily energy for US….

        You can’t ship wind or tidal power to another country like you can oil.

        I don’t oppose drilling entirely, but oil won’t address the long-term issues of shrinking fossil resources and increasing carbon in the atmosphere and oceans.

        And just as the CVSC said in their memo–the geology of the area indicates few reserves. The wind and tide we KNOW are there.

Comments are closed.