Good news: It’s not the economy. Bad news: It’s not foreign affairs, either…

4 Replies

Last week, the WSJ’s Daniel Henninger wrote a column that, from my perspective, was expressive of wishful thinking.

At one point, he wrote, “The world has reframed the politics of the 2016 election.”

A bit later, he said, “In a foreign-policy election, as it looks like we are going to have in 2016…”

Oh, if only it were so, Daniel.

Reason would dictate that we would have such an election. To begin with, all presidential elections should be foreign-policy elections, since that’s the most critical part of the job of POTUS.

But with what’s happening now in Ukraine, Gaza, Iraq, Syria, Libya, Somalia, Afghanistan and so on, there should be no question at all — a rational electorate would want first and foremost to know how a prospective president would lead us in dealing with the rest of the world.

But it doesn’t work that way, does it?

Still, my heart beat a bit faster when I saw this headline on my NPR app this morning: “It Might Sound Stupid, But Maybe It Isn’t The Economy This Time.”

But then I read on. Turns out that the world out there still doesn’t make the cut:

The economy is not the No. 1 issue?

That’s right. Gallup pollsters asked voters what was important, and the No. 1 topic turned out to be dissatisfaction with politicians. No. 2 was immigration. The economy had slipped to No. 3….

“Foreign policy/Foreign aid/Focus overseas” came in sixth.

And even the economy’s third-place status was rather artificial. Yes, “Economy in general” came in third, but “Jobs/unemployment” came in fourth. And if you combine the two, which would make more sense, they’re easily in first place.

And don’t get all overexcited and think that because “immigration” came in second, the public is all worried about the horrific conditions in Central America. No such luck.

If I had responded to that poll, and the question had been open-ended, I might have said, “dissatisfaction with voters…”

4 thoughts on “Good news: It’s not the economy. Bad news: It’s not foreign affairs, either…”

  1. Brad Warthen Post author

    By the way, if you follow those links I give you above from the names of trouble spots, you’ll get a nice, condensed notion of the condition of the world at the moment. All of these headlines but one (the Syria one, which The New Republic published last week) are from the past 24 hours:

    Ukraine — Putin Reportedly Says Russia Could ‘Take Kiev in 2 Weeks’
    Gaza — End of Gaza war doesn’t translate into peace
    Iraq — UN to send investigators to Iraq over Islamic State ‘atrocities’
    Syria — Bashar Al Assad Is Laying a Deadly Ambush for Obama in Syria
    Libya — Islamic militia group says it has ‘secured’ US compound in Libya
    Somalia — U.S. military strike in Somalia targeted al Shabaab leader
    Afghanistan — Will Afghanistan be Iraq redux?

    Reply ↓
  2. Brad Warthen Post author

    On the same topic, another WSJ columnist, Bret Stephens, writes in Commentary:

    …As I write, the foreign policy of the United States is in a state of unprecedented disarray. In some cases, failed policy has given way to an absence of policy. So it is in Libya, Syria, Egypt, Iraq, and, at least until recently, Ukraine. In other cases the president has doubled down on failed policy—extending nuclear negotiations with Iran; announcing the full withdrawal of U.S. forces from Afghanistan.

    Sometimes the administration has been the victim of events, such as Edward Snowden’s espionage, it made worse through bureaucratic fumbling and feckless administrative fixes. At other times the wounds have been self-inflicted: the espionage scandal in Germany (when it was learned that the United States had continued to spy on our ally despite prior revelations of the NSA’s eavesdropping on Chancellor Angela Merkel); the repeated declaration that “core al-Qaeda” was “on a path to defeat”; the prisoner swap with the Taliban that obtained Sergeant Bowe Bergdahl’s release.

    Often the damage has been vivid, as in the collapse of the Israel–Palestinian talks in April followed by the war in Gaza. More frequently it can be heard in the whispered remarks of our allies. “The Polish-American alliance is worthless, even harmful, as it gives Poland a false sense of security,” Radek Sikorski, Poland’s foreign minister and once one of its most reliably pro-American politicians, was overheard saying in June. “It’s bullshit.”

    This is far from an exhaustive list. But it’s one that, at last, people have begun to notice. Foreign policy, considered a political strength of the president in his first term, has become a liability. In June, an NBC/Wall Street Journal poll found that Americans disapproved of his handling of foreign affairs by a 57-to-37 percent ratio. Overseas, dismay with Obama mounts. Among Germans, who greeted the future president as a near-messiah when he spoke in Berlin in the summer of 2008, his approval rating fell to 43 percent in late 2013, from 88 percent in 2010. In Egypt, another country the president went out of his way to woo, he has accomplished the unlikely feat of making himself more unpopular than George W. Bush. In Israel, political leaders and commentators from across the political spectrum are united in their disdain for the administration. “The Obama administration proved once again that it is the best friend of its enemies, and the biggest enemy of its friends,” the center-left Haaretz columnist Ari Shavit noted in late July. It’s an observation being echoed by policymakers from Tokyo to Taipei to Tallinn….

    Reply ↓
  3. bud

    I’m sure the folks without jobs or health insurance would be pretty indifferent about who controls eastern Ukraine. People who feel targeted by police because of their race really don’t care who is in control of the Libyan embassy. Those who drive on the poor highways really aren’t much interested in the Shabaab leader. There’s an old golf adage that you drive for show and putt for dough. When it comes to the welfare of the America people foreign policy is the 300 yard drive down the fairway. But at the end of the day the folks really are most interested in issues within the homeland. And presidents need to get that right.

    Reply ↓

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *