The Golden Age of Television Overload

Good riddance to you both! Now can I have my life back for awhile? And could somebody turn up the lights?

Good riddance to you both! Now can I have my life back for awhile? And could somebody turn up the lights?

Pope Francis recently disclosed that he hasn’t watched television since 1990. Which means he’s like way behind on “Game of Thrones.” Among other things.

I’m beginning to think His Holiness is onto something. I’m feeling… a bit out of control with my own binge-watching lately. Wouldn’t I be a better person — more productive, more attuned to the needs of those around me — if I stopped watching Netflix, HBO NOW, the downstairs TV, the upstairs TV, the Roku, the Apple TV, the iPad and on very rare occasions, actual broadcast television?

The Pope has enough on his plate keeping up with matters relating to this world and the next, much less Westeros and all those other fictional universes out there.

Today, the front of the Arena section of The Wall Street Journal raises the question, “How Many TV Series Can Your Brain Take?” An excerpt:

“Game of Thrones,” which will leave multiple story lines dangling for a year with Sunday’s season finale, is notorious for befuddling even ardent fans with its many clans, lands and simmering subplots. But it’s just one of many shows taxing the memories of audiences who have been flooded with complex story lines and crowded character ensembles.

“Orange Is the New Black,” which returns Friday for a third season on Netflix, uses more than 20 characters to populate a fictional women’s prison with inmates and staff. On “Orphan Black,” finishing its third season on BBC America this month, lead actress Tatiana Maslany plays six different characters, all clones, in a sci-fi conspiracy story. New viewers have to absorb dense mythologies if they hope to jump aboard returning shows such as CBS’s summer series “Under the Dome,” which, in its coming third season, might finally explain why a bubble is encasing the town of Chester’s Mill.

The deluge of compelling shows means fans have to be good at time management to keep up with the best offerings. But they also are grappling with the limits of memory. How many shows (and knotty plots and twisting character arcs within) can we keep track of at once? In a binge-watching world, where we aren’t limited to weekly installments of network TV shows, is there a limit to the number of narratives we can keep straight?

Actually, I don’t think that frames the question correctly. Binge-watching doesn’t cause the problem of having trouble keeping up. What I find is that failing to binge-watch makes it harder to know what’s going on.

Dramatic series are written for binge-watchers, not for people who watch an episode, walk away and lead real lives, then come back in a week or more to try to pick up the thread again. That is part of what makes the new breed of shows so absorbing — they pull you into a complicated world, and if you can’t stay there until the season (at least) is over, you’re likely to be disoriented when you return.

For instance — when the third season of “House of Cards” came out several months back, I did what I had with the first two seasons. I started watching to see what everybody was talking about, then got fed up with it and quit, and then, when curiosity built up enough, came back and pushed through the rest of it.

SPOILER ALERT! Consequently, when I saw the season finale the other night, I was somewhat at a loss: Why was Claire leaving Frank? Yeah, they had been slightly weirder together the last few episodes — which means five percent more than their usual standard, which is creepy as all get-out. But what precipitated this blow-up? Surely nothing that had happened recently had showed her anything she didn’t know about her husband. Not to mention that she’s no bargain herself on the decent-person scale.

If I’d watched it all straight through, I think I might have a good feel for it. But as things stand, I don’t.

Not that it matters, right?

Last year, David Carr wrote in The New York Times about the problem of “Barely Keeping Up in TV’s New Golden Age.” I could really identify:

The vast wasteland of television has been replaced by an excess of excellence that is fundamentally altering my media diet and threatening to consume my waking life in the process. I am not alone. Even as alternatives proliferate and people cut the cord, they are continuing to spend ever more time in front of the TV without a trace of embarrassment.

I was never one of those snobby people who would claim to not own a television when the subject came up, but I was generally more a reader than a watcher. That was before the explosion in quality television tipped me over into a viewing frenzy….

And what a feast. Right now, I am on the second episode of Season 2 of “House of Cards” (Netflix), have caught up on “Girls” (HBO) and am reveling in every episode of “Justified” (FX). I may be a little behind on “The Walking Dead” (AMC) and “Nashville” (ABC) and have just started “The Americans” (FX), but I am pretty much in step with comedies like “Modern Family” (ABC) and “Archer” (FX) and like everyone one else I know, dying to see how “True Detective” (HBO) ends. Oh, and the fourth season of “Game of Thrones” (HBO) starts next month.

Whew. Never mind being able to hold all these serials simultaneously in my head, how can there possibly be room for anything else? So far, the biggest losers in this fight for mind share are not my employer or loved ones, but other forms of media….

I think back to a time before all this. Say, the ’80s. In that whole decade, I can remember watching only one dramatic series on television that in any way compares to the shows I’m juggling now: “Hill Street Blues.” There was that, and maybe “Cheers” — both on the same network on the same night. I was very, very busy with a demanding job in the daytime and a family full of young children at night, and entertainment wasn’t high on my list — which made the lack of high-quality options a good match for my lifestyle. And “Hill Street” was written for people who only visited that world weekly. There were continuing story lines, but everything was episodic. One episode held you for a week.

Lately, I’m juggling, off and on:

  • Blue Bloods” — My only current show written in that old fashioned episodic form, and the only one coming from commercial broadcast television. But I’m watching it the new way. I had never seen it before a couple of months ago, when I started the first season on Netflix. It’s the perfect length for a workout on the elliptical. I’m not quite as obsessed with it as I was with “The West Wing” last year, but I do like it.
  • Foyle’s War” — Watching this on two temporal streams. We just finished the current season of new ones on PBS last night. Meanwhile, we’re almost done with the previous seasons on Netflix.
  • Game of Thrones” — ALMOST caught up. I’ve got one more episode to watch (last week’s) before this Sunday’s season finale. And I’ll be glad to be done with it for awhile. I wanted to be up on the cultural phenomenon, and now I almost am. I don’t find it very satisfying.
  • The Wire” — The best of the lot right now. I’m trying not to spend it all at once. I’m past the halfway mark in the second season.
  • Orange is the New Black” — We were really into this, but my wife and I sort of lost interest during the second season, and didn’t get more than a few episodes into it. With the new season out today, will we get back into it? I don’t know.
  • Daredevil” — Probably the best adaptation of a Marvel franchise ever to appear on television. I’ve only got one episode left in the Netflix season, still waiting to see him in the red superhero costume. The series is taking the origins thing at a stately pace.
  • True Detective” — Got started on this and got sidetracked. Want to finish the season before the new one comes out.
  • Mad Men” — Lost interest a couple of seasons back. There’s just so much moral vacancy one can take. But my wife and daughter say the last season was as good as the early ones, so I’m going to take it back up soon.
  • The Walking Dead” — Haven’t watched it in months, but I do want to get back to it and catch up. I just want to know one thing before I do: Daryl doesn’t die, does he?
  • Justified” — It’s as good as some of my friends here say, but since the only way I can see it is on DVDs from Netflix, I only get back to it periodically. I’m only up to the second or third episode in the second season.
  • Better Call Saul” — Since we don’t get AMC (the only station I miss from cutting back on cable), I bought the season on iTunes when it first came out. So since I paid for it, I really must get back to it and watch the rest of the season at some point. It’s good, but it’s not as compelling as “Breaking Bad.” I’ve just got this investment in it.

It’s over now, but for a few weeks there, we were really into “Wolf Hall” — which we’d watch on Apple TV the night after each episode’s release, because I didn’t want to stay up past 11 on Sunday night. (One good thing about this — it forced me to go ahead and finish reading Bring Up the Bodies in order to stay ahead of the show — which I shoved aside The Guns of August in order to push through.)

Meanwhile, it seems that Netflix releases a new series daily, and some of them are bound to be good. It’s just ridiculous.

Meanwhile, I’ve been trying to read The Guns of August, a really compelling history book, for months. But if I read a chapter in a sitting, it’s unusual. And it was interrupted first by the trip to Thailand, and then by Bring Up the Bodies. Mostly, it’s a couple of pages over dinner. And talk about losing track of characters and story lines — of course, books are supposed to be that absorbing and complex. TV never was before.

Yeah, it’s true, and it’s appalling: I’ve only finished on new book so far this year.

The Pope has the right idea. I just need to summon the self-discipline…

"Daredevil:" Matt Murdock still hasn't fully donned his superhero persona.

“Daredevil:” Matt Murdock still hasn’t fully donned his superhero persona.

23 thoughts on “The Golden Age of Television Overload

    1. Brad Warthen Post author

      Yes, they’ve been talking a lot about him on NPR. I’m embarrassed to admit that I didn’t know who he was.

      From what I’ve heard, it’s not my kind of music. My jazz likes are sort of limited to Dave Brubeck and Stan Getz. Oh, and I like the CD I have of Thelonius Monk playing Ellington…

      Reply
      1. Kathryn Fenner

        Amazon Prime has all the seasons of Justified to stream.

        So far, the 3d season of OItNB is excellent.

        Reply
      2. Kathryn Fenner

        Ornette Coleman was and still is musically avant garde. Not my cup o’ tea, either, but undoubtedly a genius.
        If you like Brubeck and Getz, try Paul Desmond, Gerry Mulligan, Vince Guaraldi, Bill Evans, Brad Mehldau, Antonio Carlos Jobim, Chet Baker, Chico Hamilton…there’s a great Bill Evans channel on Pandora you will like!!

        Reply
          1. Kathryn Fenner

            Yes, Vince Guaraldi is the Peanuts guy–also wrote my favorite pop tune, “Cast Your Fate to the Wind.” Happy, cool, hip music…..

            Reply
      3. Bill

        This might be somewhat accessible.It perfectly describes,Sunday in America,well maybe in 1972,when everything was closed on Sunday,as one day of the week should be

        Reply
  1. bud

    Mostly watch sports, political news and a few reality shows. Did watch Breaking Bad. Most of these series shows drag on too long and become tedious soap operas.

    Reply
  2. Bart

    I guess my taste in music, television, and movies would be extremely eclectic. Over the span of my life, I have found that all music and other forms of entertainment to some degree has both the bad, mediocre, good, and excellent with some reaching the lofty status of genius. It is not much of a reach make the argument that Patsy Cline and Jim Reeves had absolutely wonderful singing voices in one music venue vs. a Streisand in movies and Broadway. The Bette Midler classic, “The Rose”, renditions by Midler, Conway Twitty, and the version by Andre Rieu sung by a trio led by Susan Erens are all great.

    Many of the early Rock n Roll hits were in reality a version of the blues, in particular the hit, “Since I Fell For You”, by Lennie Welch. The music composed by the Beatles has been performed by symphony orchestras and the end result was as good as any of the classical music ever composed.

    An old hit written by Gordon Lightfoot, “In The Early Morning Rain”, has been performed by several different artists and each one has its own appeal, i.e., Gordon Lightfoot, Peter, Paul, and Mary, Elvis, and a surprisingly good rendition by Mac Wiseman, a great Blue Grass artist.

    I also find many forms of gospel music not only inspiring but beautiful. Depending on my mood, at times I listen to one of the original gospel groups, The Chuck Wagon Gang and their rendition of many of the old standards.

    I will admit that some of the new music genres are difficult to listen to and a lot of it is centered around the light show, a lot of jumping up and down, and if the music is actually good, it is overridden by the presentation.

    John Denver’s performances along with PP&M were the best I have ever attended because the performances were centered around the singers and minimal backup if any.

    If ever possible, one day I would like to be able to attend one of Phillip’s concerts and enjoy his immense musical talent that few possess. We are fortunate to have him as a member of the Warthen group of contributors.

    What I find objectionable is a music snob who looks down on people who enjoy the wide variety of music and styles that are out there. If it resonates with you, then it is good music, critics be damned!!!

    Reply
    1. Kathryn Fenner

      Or as Duke Ellington said, “If it sounds good, it IS good.”
      Phillip will be featured in the opening concert for the Southeastern Piano Festival, tomorrow at 4, in the Business School auditorium. I hope he does a recital this year, too–the best way to really hear his excellence, and free, to boot.

      Reply
      1. Bart

        Thanks for the information about Phillip’s appearance tomorrow. Unfortunately, already have plans and cannot attend. But, one day hopefully.

        Hope you have a great weekend!!

        Reply
      2. susanincola

        That was beautiful. I wish more people under 50 came to these events, as they’re so much fun. I took two teenagers with me who really enjoyed it, and neither of them are musicians.
        Have you ever gone during the week and sat in on any of the master classes?

        Reply
        1. Kathryn Fenner

          I did a few years back, but I found that I beat up on myself too much when I got back home to practice! I think it’s better for me to have my own personal master teach me at a rate I can absorb.

          Reply
    2. Bill

      Patsy Cline was great,but nobody could match Mahalia Jackson.As for male vocalists,George Jones was,and is still,the man.My favorite by Gordon Lightfoot will always be If You Could Read My Mind.Johnny Cash did a good version,too.

      Reply
      1. Bart

        Lightfoot was the only one who could sing “If You Could Read My Mind” or at least in my estimation.

        To switch to movies very quickly, if you have not watched “Once Upon A Time In The West”, if you want to see someone completely step out of his usual character roles and play a really mean SOB, Henry Fonda had a great performance as “Frank”. Personally, I think it was one of the best roles he ever played. This western movie ranks right along with “High Noon” and Sergio Leone used the same techniques Fred Zinneman used. The close-ups and character studies were great.

        Reply
  3. Burl Burlingame

    The wife and I were discussing last night that binge watching is better than weekly viewing, because it’s easier to follow. This is a result of this weeks episode of “Aquarius,” the show where at least four characters look exactly like each other.

    On the other hand, Brad, if you built model airplanes while watching, you’d have something to show for your time spent.

    Reply
  4. Phillip

    The only mini-series I’ve been watching these days is a very compelling story of a titanic struggle between some Warriors and some Cavaliers, with riveting story lines, tales of heroic deeds, and even a little blood shed. There’s one, maybe two more episodes left at the most.

    Reply
    1. Doug Ross

      Yes, will we see the fall of King James by the daggers of Sir Stephen? The series has been a triple double of sheer will, physicality, and the Delly man. Will isolationists triumph over communitarians?

      Reply
    2. Brad Warthen Post author

      Dang, you FOOLED me! I was thinking it was some show about the English Civil War — only, why were you calling the Roundheads the “Warriors”…

      And I was all in a sweat thinking I was missing some awesome historical drama… and then I finally went, “Oh…

      Kind of a letdown, really…

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.