Remember Jerry Brown back in the ‘70s? Less is More? Small is beautiful?
Or for that matter, Jimmy Carter, turning down the heat in the White House and wearing cardigans? (As opposed to Richard Nixon chilling the Lincoln Sitting Room with air-conditioning so he could have a fire going in the fireplace year-round?)
I was very much into that at the time. Don’t be greedy. Have some self-discipline. Embrace self-denial. Save the planet, etc. As logic, “Less is More” seemed to me like a Christian construction, along the lines of “He that findeth his life shall lose it: and he that loseth his life for my sake shall find it.”
Then along came Reaganism, the huge reaction to all that sort of ironic wisdom – Only More is More! Small is just small! Right after the 1980 election, my wife visited our bank with our very young children, and the teller handed them lollipops without asking my wife whether it was OK. I blamed Reagan. What else could you expect when you replace a boiled-peanuts president with one who’s all about jellybeans? Me First and the Gimme-Gimmes.
Well, now we have Republicans – one of them, at least – embracing what might in a facile sense be regarded as a bad thing, or at least something less than good, as a positive. In a column headlined “Hillary: The Conservative Hope,” Bret Stephens declared:
For conservatives, a Democratic victory in November means the loss of another election, with all the policy reversals that entails. That may be dispiriting, but elections will come again. A Trump presidency means losing the Republican Party. Conservatives need to accept that most conservative of wisdoms—sometimes, losing is winning, especially when it offers an education in the importance of political hygiene.
He may call it the “most conservative of wisdoms,” but I’ve seen little evidence of that among those who have called themselves conservatives (although they often are not) for the past generation or so. What we’ve seen lately has been more of the “Crush your enemies. See them driven before you. Hear the lamentations of their women” variety….
Linda Ronstadt was quite the looker back then. She and Stevie Nicks were on my Mt. Rushmore of babes (back before I was married).
If you want to see peak Stevie Nicks, this might set your heart aflutter.
That photo would also be a great poster for supporting legalized marijuana. See what 40 years of smoking dope does to you? Millions of dollars, world renown, hot women…
Linda Ronstadt was one of the greatest ever. Her range was tremendous and she crossed all of the music lines in her day. Nothing wrong with her still being on your Mt. Rushmore as long as she doesn’t have a more prominent place than your wife. When it comes to her music, she is still on mine.
Linda Ronstadt did have a fantastic voice but has since lost it due to Parkinson’s disease. According to her she “can no longer sing a note”. But she seems to be taking it in stride saying that sooner or later something is going to get you; it may as well be this. Plus, in interviews she says everyone should sing regardless of their talent level. (paraphrasing) She says it is tremendously therapeutic. But what makes her truly special is that she is a liberal who was once an item with Governor Moonbeam. 🙂
OK, Top Five Governors Who Had Hot, Famous Girlfriends While in Office:
1. Jerry Brown (Linda Ronstadt)
2. Bob Kerrey (Debra Winger)
That’s all I can think of…
Ok, they weren’t famous until AFTER he became President.
And it leaves out Mark Sanford, because his girlfriend wasn’t famous.
Also, he doesn’t fit in the category because he wasn’t SUPPOSED to have a girlfriend, whereas Brown and Kerrey were more the swingin’ bachelor type of governors…