Category Archives: South Carolina

It could only happen in South Carolina

Since we had a good discussion on the Intel ad, I thought I’d share something else from our Monday Riley Institute session in Charleston.

Our facilitator, Juan Johnson, decided to add something new, something experimental, in Monday’s session: humor as it relates to diversity. He didn’t get into any of my favorites, such as:

Q: How  many feminists does it take to screw in a light bulb?

A: THAT’S NOT FUNNY!!!

He set up a scenario: He said, suppose you’re at a party with a diverse bunch of co-workers, and somebody starts showing some videos he thinks are funny. In each one, the humor derived from differences of gender or race or religion or regional background.

We didn’t have much of a discussion, because no one thought any of the videos were offensive or would make us uncomfortable in a group. We all just laughed our heads off. (He should have tried something a little edgier, like this. OK, maybe without the language…)

The closest anyone came to discomfort was watching the one above. I said I always feel a little bad when someone is being made fun of for being eccentric when they can’t help it. But I laughed anyway. And someone else said she wouldn’t want to watch it with friends from Boston because it might reinforce their disdain for Southerners, but she was fine watching it with fellow South Carolinians.

But that’s not why I’m telling you this story. I’m telling you because, after we’d all watched it and laughed (I’d seen it before, but still found it funny), someone called over to Jack Bass to say, “Jack, you’re from North, aren’t you?”

Jack Bass is the author, professor and ex-journalist who wrote, among other books, “The Orangeburg Massacre.” I’d known him for a bunch of years before we were in this class together. But neither I nor anyone else in the room knew what he was about to say:

“I’m the brother in Oxford she’s talking about. That’s my sister.”

Suddenly, some of us did feel a little awkward for the first time in the discussion. But it rolled right off Jack; he had seen the video loads of times over the years. In a very Southern summation, he said of his sister, “That’s just Marsha being Marsha.”

Couple of things you have to know if you come to South Carolina from elsewhere. One, each and every one of us has a tendency to be… colorful.

And two: Always, always, ALWAYS assume, when you say something about a South Carolinian, that someone else in the room is a close relative.

Is Walid Hakim a leader? He says no…

Today on their website, Occupy Columbia insists that Walid Hakim — who was arrested last night along with 19 others — is not a leader of their group. They were rather vehement about it:

An article was circulated by FitsNews.com proclaiming that Occupy Columbia has a leader, as they stated an unofficial leader.

This is NOT the case!

This article was taken completely out of context.

Occupy Columbia is and always will be a LEADERLESS movement.

Contact them and DEMAND a rewrite!!!

I could understand how Will would have gained that impression. I did, too, as you can see in the above video.

For me, Walid has been the spokesman — he’s always at the fore and available, he’s confident and articulate, he seems to know what’s going on. He’s the guy you see ostentatiously pacing at the back of the crowd talking on a cellphone as the governor’s press conference breaks upon, seeming to coordinate things. He always does things a little bigger than the others — holding his sign higher, wearing the more visible attire (a keffiyeh, a Marine Dress Blues blouse). He’s got the Days of Rage hair, the whole nine yards. News people gravitate to people like that — in a chaotic situation with no one officially in charge, you look for the guy who seems the least dazed, and start asking questions.

More traditional (if you’ll allow me this ironic use of the world) street protest leaders such as Brett Bursey have been in the background, by comparison with Walid.

But the main reason I always talk to Walid is that I know him. He and I serve together on the board of the Community Relations Council. Below you see him (just left of center) seated at one of our meetings earlier this week, in yet another incarnation, with blazer and khakis. (Yeah, I know it’s blurry, but I wasn’t planning on using it for publication. I was just fiddling with my iPhone during the meeting.)

I realize that to these folks, it’s a really, really important principle not to have leaders. But here’s my prediction: They’ll either get some leaders, or never really accomplish anything much beyond making headlines and getting arrested.

What I saw at the revolution, such as it was

After the warning and before the arrests, these were the few chosen to be arrested, waiting as the rain began to fall.

There were about 100 apparent protesters milling about in the dark as the 6 p.m. deadline arrived. People in pools of harsh TV lights being interviewed, others talking on cellphones, others just waiting.

Walid Hakim was, as he has been, a center of attention. He told me — and maybe if I can get it uploaded, I’ll put up video later — that he had just learned that his great-great-great-great-great grandfather had owned the land on which the State House was located. So he said he was just hanging out on the family homestead, waiting to be arrested. He made dramatic statements about how the rights to speak and peaceably assembly that he had defended in the Marines were about to be denied him.

Brett Bursey was there, as he had been earlier in the day. “Do they take credit cards at the jail now?” he asked me. I said they certainly should, this being the 21st century and all. Then he slouched off to confer with others here and there. A few minutes later, I asked how many times he had been arrested, counting this time. He expressed doubt that he would get arrested, and acted a bit like he was being cheated. I didn’t really follow what he was saying was happening. Then he wandered off again.

The cops still hadn’t shown.

Walid and a dozen or 15 others grouped themselves around the Confederate soldier monument, with that “I’m going to be arrested” look in their eyes. At this point, I Tweeted out:

They’re so pumped up, chanting “WE. ARE. THE 99 PERCENT!” It would be rotten of Nikki not to arrest any of them. They’d feel so let down…

Eventually, some of the State House security guys showed up and announced that pursuant to the governor’s announcement, those who did not vacate would be arrested.

By then it had started drizzling. Walid and the other designated martyrs sat around the little fence enclosing the flagpole, and waited. My iPhone and camera started getting pretty wet. I went to stand under a tree. Didn’t help much.

Finally, the officers who had made the announcement came back out onto the grounds with reinforcements — maybe 20 uniformed officers. They formed a skirmish line, donning gloves, and started walking slowly toward Gervais.

I found myself walking backwards with the protesters who would NOT be arrested toward the sidewalk along the street. I realized the working media had stayed behind with those who were to be arrested. The police had simply walked past them, parting around them like a stream around a rock. I thought about standing on ceremony and demanding to be allowed back in with the other media, but a number of disconnected thoughts were running through my mind, such as:

  • I have no credentials, and this didn’t seem like a good moment, standing in the rain with everyone a little tense, to have a debate with the authorities about how I was, too still a member of the Fourth Estate, even though all I had to show was a bradwarthen.com business card. A damp one.
  • While I had bought the insurance on my iPhone, that meant I would “only” have to pay $175 to replace it if it were ruined by the rain.
  • My little Canon with which I was trying to shoot video was likely to suffer the same fate as the one before it, which was splashed by surf and never worked again. No one would reimburse me.
  • This was all moving WAY too slowly. At this rate, no one would get any cuffs before another half hour had passed.
  • What are the long-term effects of rain upon a silk bow tie?

What the line of cops wasn’t blocking, the media types still within the perimeter were. I couldn’t see what was going on with Walid and the rest.

I went ahead and crossed the street. As I did, I saw a group of protesters had gathered on the far side of Gervais under a blue tarp. I envied them their shelter as the wind suddenly picked up dramatically.

Then, it came down in buckets. I was entirely drenched by the time I made the door of 1201 Main.

I rode the elevator up, in my soaked blazer and black (formerly gray) pants and drooping bow tie and mop of thoroughly sopping hair. Everyone looked at me as though I were a lunatic. I got up to the Capital City Club and went to the bathroom to try to dry off some with the little terry cloth towels in there.

I went to a window to look back down at the scene I had left. I couldn’t see a thing. The TV lights seemed to be gone, even.

I went on into the Membership Committee meeting from which I was playing hooky. My appearance excited comment. One member asked me whether I was ignorant of the fact that there was an attached parking garage. I mumbled some explanations, sat down, and did my best to act normal.

Here’s a report from reporters who were paid to stay behind and witness the final tedious act of the drama:

Acting at the behest of Gov. Nikki Haley, S.C. Bureau of Protective Services troopers took 19 Occupy Columbia protesters in front of the State House into custody in a driving rainstorm around 6:30 p.m. Wednesday.

Officers escorted small groups of those taken into custody back towards the State House. Officers placed band-type handcuffs behind their back. Protesters did not resist; there was no violence.

“At least you don’t have to be in rain now,” one officer said to a protester as he led a man. Protesters arrested included both men and women.

It was not known what, if any, charges those taken into custody will face.

Haley’s directive was aimed at keeping the demonstrators off State House grounds during the night. She apparently will not order state troopers to formally remove them during daylight hours.

“We the people shall never be defeated!” protesters chanted immediately before being detained…

And so forth…

Occupy Columbia getting booted at 6 p.m.

Waiting for the governor to make her move.

See update to this post in this comment below.

The buzz has been out there for a couple of hours. When I got wind of it, I walked down to the State House to see what was up.

The first person I ran into was Wesley Donehue, on his way back to his office at Donehue Direct across Gervais St.

“I guess I really stirred something up,” he said. I said something brilliant like, “Huh?”

Turns out Wesley’s the guy who sent out this letter from Sen. Harvey Peeler to Gov. Nikki Haley, in which he said,

I would like to know what the Budget and Control Board will be doing about the Occupy Columbia group…
If you drive past the State House you will see tables, sleeping bags, coolers, folding chairs and even a port-o-john. I do not know how these items do not invade the public health, safety and welfare of our citizens and visitors to our State House.

He said that “at the very least,” the group needs to complete an application for use of the State House grounds.

This stirred up the protesters considerably, and when I left them a few minutes ago, they were bracing themselves to be tossed out after the governor’s press conference at 4.

Walid Hakim, the only “99 percenter” I know, said his group would behave themselves peaceably.

But he also said, “I’m going to stay as long as I possibly can.”

I’m gonna run back down yonder and see what happens next.

Walid Hakim: "I'm going to stay as long as I possibly can."

Which blogs are your favorites (besides this one)?

Last night, before driving back from Charleston, I had a coffee for the road with Nancy Mace Jackson. As you may know, Nancy is partners with Will Folks on his blog — she handles the technical side; he does content.

While we talked about other things — as the first female cadet to graduate from The Citadel and as a communication professional, she’s very interested in the unfolding scandal at her alma mater — our talk quite naturally gravitated toward blogging.

Which reminded me…

Personally, I don’t spend as much time on other folks’ blogs as I probably should in order to stay current. So it was that I had trouble helping out the Pew Research Center’s Project for Excellence in Journalism when it came to me seeking input recently:

We are currently gearing up for the 2012 campaign/primary and election season and will be tracking political blogs in the early primary states. We are in the process of identifying potential blogs to track, and are reaching out to some bloggers that we are already aware of in these states for additional suggestions and recommendations. Any assistance you could give us in this effort would be greatly appreciated.  We are interested in tracking liberal, conservative and non-partisan blogs.

Here are the blogs Pew’s PEJ was looking at already:

That list made me realize I needed to update my blogroll. It has some on it that haven’t posted in a while, while other active blogs are missing.

What have you been reading that isn’t on that list?

Also, while we’re on the subject…

I’ll be undertaking a redesign of this blog in the near future.  Help me out by pointing me to blogs you like, both in terms of how they look and (more importantly) functionality. Yes, I know many of you want to be able to edit your posts — which will most likely require registration, which I’ve stayed away from thus far.

But which blogs do you find easiest and most pleasurable to read? What are some bells and whistles I don’t have now that you’d like to see?

I’d appreciate the input.

Tweeting the GOP debate, in reverse

Anybody see that movie, “Memento”? Well, here are my comments from during the GOP debate in Spartanburg — what I could see of it online (and here I thought I was smart, watching it from home).

And they’re backwards because that’s the way they look on Twitter. It’s just faster to put them up this way:

BradWarthen Brad Warthen

Oh, EVERYBODY won except CBS… RT @davidfrum: CNBC wins this debate. Bad job CBS

2 minutes ago

BradWarthen Brad Warthen

This is a major black eye for CBS…

5 minutes ago

BradWarthen Brad Warthen

@

@SC_Bill Thanks, but I think I’m getting it SLIGHTLY better on The Daily Beast: bit.ly/vyB52G

7 minutes ago

BradWarthen Brad Warthen

Best debaters tonight thus far: Huntsman, Newt, Romney, maybe Santorum.

8 minutes ago

BradWarthen Brad Warthen

Are people who liked Cain starting to picture him as commander in chief and going, “Uh-ohhh…”?

9 minutes ago

BradWarthen Brad Warthen

WHEW! Thought for a moment Michele was going to recommend The Great Society…

11 minutes ago

davidfrum davidfrum

How can you talk about international economics w/out mention of euro crisis?

14 minutes ago

Retweeted by BradWarthen

BradWarthen Brad Warthen

I like Huntsman, but he needs to know that on the East coast, we don’t say “template” with a long A…

14 minutes ago

BradWarthen Brad Warthen

OK, I guess I made a big mistake not dragging myself up to Spartanburg. I stayed here under the mistaken impression this was 21st century!

16 minutes ago

BradWarthen Brad Warthen

What kind of feed is this? Bootleg? Is CBS jamming it or something? What century do they think this is?

19 minutes ago

BradWarthen Brad Warthen

I want to know who decided our local affiliate wouldn’t carry all of the debate?

20 minutes ago

BradWarthen Brad Warthen

@

@SCHotline Old enough to feel stupid for having predicted that Perry would be the nominee…

23 minutes ago

BradWarthen Brad Warthen

Did Ron Paul just say we shouldn’t feel compelled to stop the murders of hundreds of millions?

25 minutes ago

BradWarthen Brad Warthen

What Perry WANTS to say is, “Come ON, people — hair like Reagan, sound like Bush! What more do you want?”

32 minutes ago

BradWarthen Brad Warthen

With that outfit, Huntsman could be front man for a doo-wop group. He’s pulling out ALL the stops to get noticed…

35 minutes ago

BradWarthen Brad Warthen

I think Huntsman is saying really wise things, but the tie is so distracting that you can hardly even notice that his SUIT is metallic red.

37 minutes ago

BradWarthen Brad Warthen

Perry overpronounces “virtues” like he just learned the word today…

41 minutes ago

BradWarthen Brad Warthen

There goes Newt again, talking like the grownup…

43 minutes ago

BradWarthen Brad Warthen

Huntsman ALSO says wise and moral things (about torture), without being crazy…

45 minutes ago

BradWarthen Brad Warthen

Ron Paul is seen as crazy, which gives him license to say wise and moral things occasionally…

47 minutes ago

marcambinder Marc Ambinder

Reminds me of Howard Dean’s boast that he had national security experience because he commanded the Vermont National Guard.#CBSNJDebate

52 minutes ago

Retweeted by BradWarthen

BradWarthen Brad Warthen

@scott_english A four-day delay doesn’t qualify as “quick” wit…

50 minutes ago

BradWarthen Brad Warthen

Does Perry look dazed to anyone else?

53 minutes ago

BradWarthen Brad Warthen

Rebuild the Navy? Hey, Newt’s pandering to me!

55 minutes ago

BradWarthen Brad Warthen

Santorum’s assertion that Pakistan must be our friend because it has the bomb was off, but he seems to get it that security is complex…

57 minutes ago

BradWarthen Brad Warthen

Is it just me, or does Santorum look and sound younger than last time I saw and heard him?

1 hour ago

BradWarthen Brad Warthen

See that? Perry just made Bachmann sound really smart. And he almost looks like he knows it…

1 hour ago

BradWarthen Brad Warthen

Perry’s “zero foreign aid” assertion makes his “oops” moment sound like soaring genius…

1 hour ago

BradWarthen Brad Warthen

This is the first real problem I’ve had with Huntsman to date. I can’t handle that tie. What do you call that color?

1 hour ago

Entire DHEC board elected by Haley

OK, here’s a piece of the puzzle that was missing for me when I read Vincent Sheheen’s release demanding that the whole DHEC board resign for having approved a permit for Georgia…

The whole board was appointed by Nikki Haley:

  • Chairman and Member-at-large — Allen Amsler
  • 1st District — Mark Lutz
  • 2nd District — Robert Kenyon Wells
  • 4th District — L. Clarence Batts, Jr.
  • 5th District — Ann B. Kirol, DDS
  • 6th District — John O. Hutto, Sr., MD
  • Make of that what you will, but you can begin to see why the senator just might be holding the governor responsible for what he regards as a sellout of South Carolina’s environment and its economy.

    The new iPads arrive at Lexington High School

    This student, whom I cannot name because she's just 17, had found time to personalize hers...

    Thursday morning I spoke to Michael Burgess’ class at Lexington High School. The format was much like one of Kelly Payne’s classes — the kids had a prepared list of questions, which is what I like. I hate a set speech, with me droning on and wondering whether anyone is interested. With questions, I at least know I’m addressing something my audience cares about — or something their teacher wants them to care about.

    Sample questions:

    1. How does the media influence the political process? Is this a positive or negative influence?
    2. Discuss the impact of social media outlets on the political discourse of today?
    3. What is the role of money in determining the outcome of elections?
    4.Could you list and describe the various sources of funding for campaigns?
    5.What is the real role versus the appropriate role of interest groups in influencing policy?

    But my speech was definitely not the most interesting thing happening in those students’ school day, because I arrived on the same day as the new iPads.

    I had trouble finding a place to park because the visitor spaces, I was told, were taken up by district people who were there for the iPad rollout.

    Here’s a release on the Lexington One website about the new devices:

    Last year (the 2010–2011 school year), Lexington County School District One successfully executed a personal mobile computing pilot at Gilbert High School as part of our ongoing search for ways to provide students with the tools they need to support their learning and to prepare them for higher education opportunities and careers.

    At that time, we explained that we planned to expand the program to our other high schools.

    This year (2011–2012), we are expanding personal mobile computing to our other three high schools. All high schools will begin issuing the devices in November.

    The district feels strongly that its personal mobile computing initiative is not about the tool used. It is not about an iPad or a tablet. It is about what a personal mobile computing device enables our students to do.

    With these devices, students will acquire the digital competence they need for our increasingly electronic- and technology-driven world. They will learn the essential skills they will need as consumers, citizens and workers.

    The devices will give students access to the most current information available through the Internet and to the district’s Learning Management System 24 hours a day, seven days a week during the school year.

    Students will be able to complete and turn in assignments, homework, projects or research electronically. Interactive applications will allow them to improve their reading fluency, build mathematics skills or create their own study cards.

    Unfortunately, as yet, not all textbook publishers provide electronic copies of every textbook, so the district will not be able to eliminate textbooks. Teachers will be able, however, to supplement material found in textbooks with information they create using various multimedia or with information already available.

    Lexington One purchased the personal mobile computing devices as part of the voter-approved 2008 Bond Referendum. That bond referendum included $15 million to expand and upgrade existing technology at all schools.

    Read our Personal Mobile Computing Guide for high school students.

    I should mention that the students were all politely attentive to my talk. I don’t think I could have been, with a new iPad in front of me…

    Vincent Sheheen wants entire DHEC board to quit, hints at impropriety by Nikki Haley

    I don’t know what Vincent Sheheen knows, or thinks he knows, but he comes on pretty strong in this release I got from Phil Bailey a few moments ago:

    Sheheen Calls DHEC Port Decision a Costly Blunder

    Calls for DHEC Board’s Resignation

    Columbia, SC  – State Senator Vincent Sheheen of Camden today called the state’s Department of Health and Environmental Control (DHEC) unanimous decision to allow the dredging of waterways to the Port of Savannah a costly blunder and called for Board members to resign immediately. Sheheen issued the following statement:

    “Today’s decision by the DHEC board is a disaster for our state’s environment and our future economic growth. Selling out on protection of our sensitive natural habitats and our own economy is a blunder that will cost us dearly in jobs and natural resources. The DHEC Board members should resign immediately and Governor Haley should replace them with knowledgeable individuals who will represent the best interest of South Carolina and who are not campaign contributors to Haley. I am further requesting that state Senate President Pro Tem Glenn McConnell convene an investigatory committee to review whether or not the DHEC board was improperly influenced.  I am also calling on Governor Haley to disclose immediately all contributions, if any, she received from persons or corporations residing in the state of Georgia during the last six months.”

    “The actions today show a disregard for our state’s economic and environmental interests.  Every person who loves this state should be shocked.”

    ###

    Here’s what little I know about the action that prompted the release, from The Associated Press:

    COLUMBIA, S.C. — The board overseeing South Carolina’s environmental agency has approved a compromise with the Army Corps of Engineers over a permit to dredge the Savannah River.

    The agency’s board voted unanimously Thursday to accept the agreement, putting Georgia and the federal government a step closer to deepening 35 miles between the Atlantic Ocean and the port of Savannah, Ga.

    DHEC staff denied the Corps’ water permit request in September. The agreement was reached minutes before an appeal before the board.

    It includes Georgia’s promise to pay for upkeep on devices the Corps will install to inject oxygen into the river, and agreeing to preserve an additional 1,500 acres of marsh.

    Patrick Moore with the Coastal Conservation League says his group will appeal the decision to the state’s Administrative Law Court.

    There seems little doubt that this is not good news for SC, but I have no way of knowing whether there is anything nefarious going on.

    The Ariail cartoon that plumb tickled them ol’ fancy-pants NLRB lawyers

    Here’s the Robert Ariail cartoon that the smart-a__ Yankee NLRB attorneys were passing around and giggling about:

    WASHINGTON — Lawyers for the federal labor agency fighting Boeing’s new factory in North Charleston, N.C., repeatedly joked among themselves about the dispute and exchanged a political cartoon portraying S.C. Sen. Glenn McConnell as a crass-speaking confederate soldier, according to internal documents released Wednesday.

    They enjoyed it as much as they could, but we can take satisfaction from knowing that they couldn’t possibly have enjoyed it on the deeper, convoluted levels of meaning that are accessible to us, the cognoscenti.

    Congrats to Joe Riley, America’s best mayor

    Joe Riley always runs hard for re-election, but in the end it’s always a blowout. He’s now 10 and 0:

    Joe Riley wins big

    Incumbent secures 10th term as mayor

    Joe Riley, the only mayor most Charlestonians have ever known, handily won re-election Tuesday to a fresh four-year term that he has said will be his last.

    Riley received more than 67 percent of the vote, swamping his four opponents and assuring that he will keep the full-time job that city voters first gave him in 1975, according to complete, unofficial results.

    Riley gave a victory speech Tuesday night, well before all votes were counted, as most initial precinct tallies showed him with a commanding edge over his closest opponent, City Councilman William Dudley Gregorie.

    “I think it’s safe to say that this campaign is cruising to victory,” he told more than 100 jubilant supporters at Jason’s Deli in West Ashley.

    Riley repeatedly used the “cruising to victory” phrase, a not-so-subtle reference to the city’s heated and ongoing debate over cruise ships. Riley has defended the cruise industry and said the city is doing enough to regulate it.

    Opponents, including some downtown neighborhood and nonprofit groups, disagreed, and some of them poured money into Gregorie’s campaign and possibly into a separate political committee, Citizens for a Better Charleston, that mailed many pro-Gregorie, anti-Riley fliers.

    A recent federal court ruling means that such groups can raise unlimited amounts of money for political campaigns without disclosing donors’ identities.

    Riley said those mailings backfired.

    “The people of Charleston … spoke to that secret committee, spoke to those scared fatcats, spoke about evasion and skirting ethics laws, spoke about filthy dirty campaign tactics, big money, and the people of Charleston said we do not want this in Charleston. This has no place here.”…

    Amen to that, Joe.

    Not much else to say except congratulations again to America’s best mayor.

    ‘… No! He is RISING!…’ Remembering Smokin’ Joe Frazier

    For some reason, I can’t find the audio on the Joe Frazier story I heard this morning on NPR. I find a different (earlier, I think) version, but not the one that affected me so.

    The closest I can come is to post the recording above. The relevant part is at 1:30.

    The story played audio from a number of great Frazier fights, especially against Mohammed Ali. But the amazing thing happened with what NPR did with a clip from the 1973 fight with George Foreman (the grill guy, for you youngsters). They played a longer clip of it early in the report, and then, at the end, as music rises in the background, you hear Howard Cosell hoarsely screaming:

    Frazier is down again, and he may be… No! He is rising

    I had goosebumps. It was incredible. In that moment, Smokin’ Joe lived on…

    At least the fries were French

    This isn’t Proust. In fact, I’ve never read Proust. And the descriptions I’ve read of Remembrance of Things Past never seem to recommend it, because they always note how amazingly long it is. In any event, I don’t read French, and it seems a waste to spend that much time on something and not know at the end whether it bore any resemblance to what the author intended.

    But today, under the most mundane circumstances, I experienced something like the episode of the madeleine. Really. It was way literary.

    Lanier and I were having lunch at the Mousetrap, and I had ordered the hamburger steak with fries. We had told the waitress Lanier had a pressing appointment, and our orders came out quickly, and hot. Something about the look of the fries put my mind on the verge of something. They were perfectly ordinary crinkle-cuts, but there was something about the color, the apparent consistency. When I tasted one, everything — flavor, moisture, temperature, mixture of crispness and tenderness, the grease, the feeling against my teeth — brought back a very specific memory from 43 years ago. That was when I had tasted fries that were exactly like these.

    Initially, the memory that came to me was visual. In my mind’s eye, I could see that I was in a diner. From the center of the field of vision running off to the right was a counter, with high stools, behind it one of those windows to the kitchen. Starting at the center and running toward the left was a window with blinds — it was dark outside — and then a doorway out to a sidewalk. I couldn’t see where I was sitting — a booth, a table? — only what I could see, looking up, from that vantage point. There were people moving about, but they were indistinct, ghostly. I couldn’t fix on them. Then came the sounds of the place, the clanking dishes, the hiss of the grill, the rowdy sounds of boys’ voices.

    I knew where I was. The junior varsity basketball team of Bennettsville High School — 1967-68 school year — was on the road. We were having dinner after a game in a small town in the Pee Dee, before getting back on the bus to head back to B’ville. I was 14 and this was an adventure, one of many like it.

    I was part of the team and not on the team — sort of like Ollie, the team manager, at the start of “Hoosiers.” After the grueling tryouts (one gets a taste of eternity in windsprints up and down the court), the coach looked down at me and told me I had almost made it. He was sure I’d be ready next year. If I’d be the manager, I could work out with the team and play against Robin Frye in practices. Robin was the only guy as short as I was who had made the team. I was in the 9th grade, and wouldn’t get my height for a couple of years.

    Most of my duties were pretty simple — gathering up the balls after practice and such. But I had one that I regarded as core, one that made me feel important beyond my years. I was the official scorekeeper for the team. I sat at the folding table along the sidelines with the other team’s scorekeeper on my left, and the guy with the scoreboard controls and buzzer on my right. My supreme moment of the season was in a late home game. One of our guys was fouled, and he took his free throw and made it. The referee was giving to the ball to the other team to take out when I told the guy next to me to hit the buzzer. The ref came over and I told him our player was entitled to a second shot because it was a one-and-one situation. The ref said he didn’t think it was. I told him I was sure, and showed him the fouls on my sheet — I remembered each one. The other scorekeeper said no; there hadn’t been that many fouls.

    The ref said that since I was the home scorekeeper, my record was official. He went back out and gave our guy another shot.

    I’m surprised I didn’t fall off my folding chair, I was so drunk with power. I couldn’t believe it — I had given a signal, and that whole packed gym had stopped everything to hear what I had to say. And then, my word being law, I had pronounced my ruling, and the ref and all those other adults had obeyed.

    It’s good to be the scorekeeper.

    But I kept my face impassive, and acted like this was the way things were supposed to be.

    In the late 80s, I attended my cousin’s graduation. His was the final class to graduate as Green Gremlins. The graduation was held in the football stadium of the new, consolidated Marlboro High School, which everyone would attend the next year. But then a storm came up. Those in charge decided everyone would repair across town to the old school, and we’d complete the ceremonies in the auditorium there. So we did.

    The place was packed, and steaming hot. There wasn’t enough room for everyone to sit in the auditorium, so people were distributed anywhere they could get a vantage point of the stage. I found myself in the wings of the stage itself, watching the kids come up for their diplomas. I remembered that one of the backstage doors opened onto the gym, and slipped away to go check it out.

    Speaking of “Hoosiers” — remember the end, with the camera panning slowly through an almost-empty gym, obviously years after the miraculous championship? There’s a small boy dribbling and taking shots, alone, at one end of the court, and every time the ball hits the court surface, the echoes resound, as the camera gradually swings up and zooms in on the portrait of The Team. It was like that. It felt like that; my every step sounded like that.

    I went over and stood in the spot from which I had issued The Ruling. Odd, it strikes me now, that a movie hasn’t been made about that great moment in sports history. Hollywood doesn’t know what’s good, I guess.

    Those are the things I thought of when I bit into that one fry. No, it’s not great literature, but the same principle of involuntary memory applied…

    Moderation, seen as a vice

    Shaking my head as I read this:

    Huntsman tries to shed ‘moderate’ label

    By GINA SMITH – gnsmith@thestate.com
    Jon Huntsman’s S.C. advisors are pushing back on the “moderate” label that has dogged the former Utah governor in his candidacy for the Republican nomination for president.

    “We have a story to tell about Huntsman that hasn’t been told yet,” Richard Quinn, a S.C. advisor to Huntsman, said Thursday as Huntsman shook hands and ate barbeque at a Columbia restaurant.

    S.C. politicos increasingly agree the S.C. race will come down to former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, who consistently has finished in the top two in S.C. polls, and a “non-Romney” candidate, likely to be someone further to the political right of Romney.

    That means a new narrative is needed for Huntsman who, rightly or wrongly, has been labeled as a moderate by many S.C. voters because of his stint as U.S. ambassador to China under President Barack Obama, his support for same-sex civil unions and his belief in global warming….

    What has become of our nation when it is a virtue — a prerequisite, even — to be an extremist? This is not a good place to be, people. It’s like… civilization itself having a bad name.

    What E.J. wrote from here (I’m quoted, so you know it’s gotta be good)

    Thought y’all might be interested in reading E.J. Dionne’s column today, which he wrote before leaving Columbia yesterday.

    Have to say I was a bit panicky when I started reading it, because I saw he was going in some directions that matched things I had said, and I hoped I hadn’t gone too much out on a limb as a source, to the point of embarrassing him or me. I was just, you know, talking, driving around town, having a Yuengling at Yesterday’s after the lecture — the way I do. (By the way, E.J. drank O’Doul’s. But I’m convinced that he is Catholic, nevertheless. He also chews nicotine gum constantly, to hold another vice at bay.) But I knew the main point of what I had said was sound. I was talking about the utter predictability of the GOP in SC (and elsewhere) at this point in its history.

    Being the smart guy that he is, he fully got that. And being even smarter, which is to say a thorough professional, he talked to plenty of other people, from Bob McAlister to Mark Sanford to Mick Mulvaney to Will Folks (and others who didn’t make it into the column, such as Wesley Donehue).

    It’s well worth a read. Here’s an excerpt:

    What South Carolina can do for the GOP candidates

    By , Published: November 2

    COLUMBIA, S.C.

    Can Mitt Romney be dislodged as the fragile but disciplined front-runner for the Republican presidential nomination? If he can, South Carolina is the best bet for the role of spoiler.

    Republican primary voters here have historically ratified establishment choices, but the old establishment has been displaced by new forms of conservative political activism, the Tea Party being only the latest band of rebels.

    South Carolina conservatives also seem representative of their peers around the country in being uncertain and more than a trifle confused about the choices they have been handed. They are skeptical of Romney, were disappointed by Rick Perry’s early performance, were enchanted by Herman Cain — a spell that may soon be broken — and are not sure what to make of the rest of the field.

    All this, paradoxically, gives hope to the non-Romneys in the contest, including Perry but also former Utah governor Jon Huntsman, who was campaigning in the state this week…

    Oh, I know you want to get to the good part, so here it is:

    The candidate who absolutely needs to win here is Perry. It’s no accident that he announced his candidacy in Charleston. Brad Warthen, a popular South Carolina blogger (and a friend of mine from his days as editorial page editor of the State newspaper), thought at the time that Perry’s August announcement speech was pitch-perfect for the state’s conservatives in its passionately anti-government and anti-Washington tone, delivered in the city where the Civil War began. The primary and indeed, the nomination, seemed within Perry’s grasp.

    I’m mentioned again later, so read the whole thing.

    And thanks again to E.J. for coming down and making this year’s Bernardin lecture one of our best.

    Thanks, E.J., for giving us a piece of your mind

    Before another day passes, I want to express my appreciation to E.J. Dionne of the Washington Post Writers Group and the Brookings Institution, for delivering the 2011 Cardinal Bernardin lecture at USC last night.

    Perhaps because he’s from my world, he spoke to me as no previous speaker has in the 12 years of the series — of faith and public life, particularly in the sense of how the Cardinal’s life and work relate to our existence today. So I thank him for that. I also thank all those who contributed to bringing about this event — the Department of Religious Studies, the College of Mass Communications and Information Studies, President Harris Pastides’ Civil Discourse Initiative, and Samuel Tenenbaum and the Tenenbaum Lectureship Fund.

    For those of you who don’t know, Joseph Bernardin was a son of Italian immigrants who grew up here in Columbia, as a parishioner at my church, St. Peter’s. He would become the leading light of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, the force behind such remarkable documents as “The Challenge of Peace: God’s Promise and Our Response.” He fostered the Church’s Common Ground Initiative, and his greatest legacy (to me) is placing the Church’s pro-life ethic within the compelling — and necessary — framework of the Seamless Garment — a legacy that, inexplicably to me, remains controversial, even anathema, among some. After becoming Archbishop of Chicago, he was widely regarded as a likely first American pope before his death of cancer in 1996 at the age of 68.

    E.J. is that rare bird in the higher reaches of journalism who writes regularly of matters that bear upon ultimate questions (see, for instance, “The Vatican meets the Wall Street occupiers” from last week), and does so with an intellectual vigor that not only reflects credit upon his and my faith tradition, but shows what journalism is still capable of achieving at this late date. He knew the cardinal, and has long admired him.

    Here’s a rough draft of his remarks. There are typos, and it is incomplete (entire anecdotes are missing), but it gives you an idea of what he had to say. An excerpt:

    I want to close with something I have been pondering ever since the Spriritan fathers of Duquesne University asked me to give a talk about immigration. I was struck when I was preparing the talk how much both the Old and New Testament had to say about our obligations to strangers. Not to brothers or sisters or neighbors, but the strangers. And it made me think that perhaps our calling is really to create a world without strangers. Yes, that’s utopian and impractical and all sorts of other things. But it is a useful objective to ponder, a useful goal to keep in front of us. It is a world in which there is no “other,” no “them” or “those people,” just fellow citizens or fellow children of God or fellow human beings. It is a world in which we share each other’s joys and sorrows, each other’s benefits and burdens. It is a world in which the fortunate realize that their affluence depends not just on their own hard work and skill, but also on luck and providence. Often, simply, the good fortune of having been born in a particular place, to a particular family. We all owe so much of who we are to our parents and what they did for us. And not a single one of us can claim to have been wise or farsighted in our choice of parents. That truly was God’s choice, or for those who don’t believe, fate’s. And the same applies to the country in which we are born. We cannot praise ourselves for being really smart to have been born in the United States of America. A world without strangers would be a better world because all of us, everywhere, would feel at home all the time. In a world without strangers, we approach the new people we meet, anticipating the joys of friendship, not the anxieties of enmity. And yes, a world without strangers would be a world more likely to heed the injunction of the prophet Isaiah, to undo the heavy burdens and let the oppressed go free. It would be a world more likely to resemble the place imagined by the prophet Amos, who, as Dr. King taught us in his “I Have a Dream” speech, imagined that justice would roll down like waters, and righteousness like a mighty stream. I believe that Cardinal Bernardin spent his life trying to create a world without strangers. His mission to honor the dignity of every person was not just political but also personal. He provided us a model.  So let us live by his words: “Yesterday is gone. Tomorrow has not yet come. We have only today. Let us begin.”

    OK, that’s heavy, I know. Hey, it was the ending. Perhaps I can show you better the spirit of the way E.J. speaks with this ice-breaker from the beginning:

    Whenever someone gives me an introduction that is far too generous, I like to note what it’s like to give talks about politics and be introduced with the words: “And now, for the latest dope from Washington, here’s E. J. Dionne.”

    That’s E.J. He doesn’t take himself too seriously, but he approaches the most important issues with all the respect and reverence they deserve and demand.

    I hope Kathryn Fenner and “Abba,” who were both there, will weigh in with their thoughts about the lecture. I had the impression that they found it meaningful as well.

    ONE is back in operation in SC, seems to have issue-advocacy field largely to itself this time

    I read this with interest today:

    ONE Launches “ONE Vote 2012” in South Carolina, Announces State Co-chairs and Local Ambassadors

    PUBLISHED: 2 NOV. 2011

    Co-chairs former Governor David Beasley and former Attorney General Henry McMaster will lead South Carolina’s ONE Vote 2012 election effort, with Campaign Manager Sarah Huckabee Sanders, to raise awareness of American leadership in the fight against extreme poverty and disease

    Columbia, SC – Today, ONE launches the “ONE Vote 2012” campaign in South Carolina to engage directly with candidates, their staff and voters about the importance of maintaining American leadership in the battle to alleviate extreme poverty and preventable disease.

    Sarah Huckabee Sanders will manage the effort and Palmetto State co-chairs former Governor David Beasley and former Attorney General Henry McMaster will lead a local committee of Ambassadors. The local committee features prominent conservative voices including: President and CEO of the Palmetto Family Council, Oran Smith, former Superintendent Barbara Nielsen, and other political and community leaders (see complete list of ambassadors below).

    “It isn’t possible to put a price tag on life. But when we do look at the bottom line, we see our assistance has saved millions of lives, each one precious, for less than one percent of the budget,” said President and CEO of the Palmetto Family Council, Oran Smith. “We have also seen that respect for life leads to democracy, stability and economic growth. Life. Elected governments. Free Enterprise. These are among our most precious values.”

    The Ambassadors will work throughout the primary seasons with South Carolina’s ONE team, and the state’s more than 12,000 ONE members, to raise the profile of issues that affect the world’s poorest people. Through the 2012 election, ONE will ask those seeking to be president to support programs that address critical needs in developing countries.  Specifically, the ONE Vote 2012 platform encourages policies that will continue to support life-saving programs and promote the long-term health and economic progress of people in the world’s poorest places.

    “ONE had a successful operation in South Carolina back in 2008 working with the presidential candidates, to incorporate plans to address extreme poverty in their platforms,” said ONE Vote 2012 Campaign Manager Sarah Huckabee Sanders. “This January, the eyes of the nation will be back on South Carolina and we are asking local communities to stand up to preserve the less than 1% of the budget that saves the lives of those surviving on less than $1.25 a day.”

    ONE Vote 2012 co-chairs Beasley and McMaster will collaborate with the state ambassadors to ensure candidates are aware of strategic, cost-effective ways the next president can continue to help the most vulnerable among us help themselves. They will advise the ONE team on best ways to reach more South Carolina voters, speak on behalf of the organization, and urge this year’s Republican presidential hopefuls to help protect programs that provide childhood vaccines, treatments that prevent the transmission of HIV from mother-to-child and teach advanced farming techniques that help families feed and support themselves.

    To learn more about ONE Vote 2012 in South Carolina please visit the ONE Vote website or email South Carolina Field Organizers Charlie Harris (Charles.Harris@ONE.org) and Zach Lamb (Zach.Lamb@ONE.org.)

    ONE Vote 2012 Co-chairs:

    • The Honorable David Beasley, former Governor of South Carolina
    • The Honorable Henry McMaster, former Attorney General of South Carolina

    ONE Vote 2012 Ambassadors:

    • The Honorable Weston Adams, former US Ambassador to Malawi, Reagan Appointee
    • Dr. Alice Burmeister, Associate Dean, College of Visual and Performing Arts, Winthrop University
    • Edward Cousar, Second Vice-Chair, South Carolina Republican Party
    • Timothy Ervolina, President, United Way Association of South Carolina
    • Reverend Wendy Hudson-Jacoby, Pastor, North Charleston United Methodist Church
    • Narcie Jeter, Director, Winthrop Wesley Foundation in Rock Hill
    • Christy McMillin-Goodwin, Oakland Baptist Church in Rock Hill
    • The Honorable Barbara Nielsen, former State Superintendent of Education
    • Reverend Len Ripley, Midland Park United Methodist Church
    • The Honorable Robert Royall, former US Ambassador to Tanzania, George W. Bush Appointee
    • The Honorable James Smith, Captain, South Carolina Army National Guard and veteran,Operation Enduring Freedom (Afghanistan)
    • Dr. Oran Smith, President and CEO of the Palmetto Family Council
    • Bryan Stirling, Deputy Attorney General, South Carolina Attorney General’s Office
    • Trey Walker, Director, State Government Relations, University of South Carolina
    • The Honorable Joe Wilson, U.S. Representative (R, SC-2)

    MEDIA NOTE: For more information or to request interviews with ambassadors, please contact Hannah Schwartz at Hannah.Schwartz@one.org or 202-957-3149.

    ONE is an advocacy organization dedicated to the fight against extreme poverty and preventable disease around the world, particularly in Africa.  Backed by more than 2.5 million members, we work with government leaders in both parties to support proven, cost-effective solutions to save lives and build sustainable futures.
    -###-

    That’s a pretty impressive roster, and I’m sure their help will be appreciated, because Bono can’t do it all alone.

    But what struck me about this was that by this time four years ago, there were several such nonprofit, nonpartisan outfits that had set up shop in SC to try to raise awareness of certain issues in connection with the presidential primaries. While I may have missed one, this is the first I’ve seen actually make an announcement like this.

    No doubt it’s about the lack of money, which has if anything hit nonprofits harder than businesses, but there’s something about this campaign that just seems low-energy by contrast to this point in 2007  — actually, much earlier than that. Yeah, there’s only one primary instead of two, but still… it’s been mighty quiet in these parts.

    Anyway, welcome to SC, ONE. I wish you well in getting your issues before the voting public.

    Bono in ONE's Paris office.

    Sorry, boys, but I’m with the feds on this one

    This just in from our friend Wesley Donehue on behalf of the SC Senate Republicans:

    SENATE PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE AND SENATE MAJORITY LEADER ISSUE JOINT STATEMENT ON U.S. JUSTICE DEPARTMENT’S INJUNCTION AGAINST S.C. IMMIGRATION LAW

    MCCONNELL AND PEELER: FEDERAL GOVERNMENT FORCES THE STATES TO ACT ON IMMIGRATION BUT SHOOT THEM DOWN WHEN THEY DO

    Columbia, SC – November 2, 2011 – This week, the United States Justice Department challenged South Carolina’s new immigration law, preventing it from going into effect. The Justice Department argues that the new law preempts the federal government’s overview of immigration. Both Senator Glenn McConnell and Senator Harvey Peeler believe that the federal government would be the perfect governing body in the country to initiate immigration policy, but for years it has been failing to act.

    Senator McConnell said, “I wish that the federal government was as vigilant in protecting the country’s borders and enforcing our nation’s immigration laws as they are in attacking states like South Carolina that try to step up to the plate and act because the federal government refuses to do so. South Carolina has a duty to protect our citizens and our budgets from the problems caused by unfettered illegal immigration and I believe that we have done so in a lawful manner. But if the federal government wants us to quit acting in this area, the solution is simple – do your job.”

    “The federal government’s inaction on this issue has forced states across the nation to react to the growing problem of illegal immigration. However, when the states pass laws that address this problem, the federal government rushes in to stop them. It’s time for Washington to stop focusing their energies on those trying to solve the problem and start addressing the real problem of illegal immigration on a national level,” Senator Peeler said.

    It has been over half a decade since the United States passed a broad immigration law. Since then, immigration has continued to be a problem for states. In response, states across the nation have enacted immigration laws to help combat this problem in our country. These laws vary, but the federal government has thus far seemed intent on removing key enforcement provisions through federal court cases, rendering the laws ineffective.

    Senator McConnell and Senator Peeler have always been strong supporters of legal immigration. They believe illegal immigration cheapens the value for all immigrants who come to the United States through legal means. South Carolina’s immigration law will help provide one more disincentive for those looking to illegally immigrate to the U.S.

    “Immigration has been part of our nation’s heritage from the beginning. However, the federal government’s inaction is tarnishing this national tradition. If those in Washington are unwilling to act, they must support states in their efforts to do what is best for their citizens,” Peeler continued.

    ###

    Sorry, boys, but I’m with the federales on this one.

    Chalk it up to my Catholicism. Last night, after E.J. Dionne’s lecture, a few of us went to Yesterday’s to talk religion and politics and other stuff polite folks don’t talk about.

    At one point E.J. invoked our Mass readings from Sunday before last:

    “You shall not molest or oppress an alien,
    for you were once aliens yourselves in the land of Egypt.
    You shall not wrong any widow or orphan.
    If ever you wrong them and they cry out to me,
    I will surely hear their cry…”

    Note that it doesn’t say, “… as long as they have the proper documentation.”

    Now, before Doug gets on his high horse about legality… Folks, I want immigration laws enforced, too — but I also want just immigration laws that recognize economic realities and that are consistent with our being a nation of immigrants, a nation of people who welcome the stranger.

    And the popular pressure for South Carolina to usurp federal powers on this issue arises from a very different impulse.

    About those parking garages…

    A colleague (not anyone with The State) asked me this morning what I thought about that parking garages story in The State Sunday morning:

    Exclusive | USC garages $4 million in the red

    Two parking facilities underutilized

    By WAYNE WASHINGTON – wwashington@thestate.com

    The University of South Carolina has spent $4 million over the last three years to cover deficits at a pair of underutilized parking structures built to serve the school’s Innovista research campus.

    And it could be another half-dozen years before the garages break even, bringing in as much money as they cost the university each year in debt payments.

    Combined, the Horizon garage on Main Street and the Discovery garage on Park Street bring in roughly $764,000 a year less in parking revenue than they were expected to generate, according to figures provided by the university.

    USC contractually is pledged to use its “best efforts” to cover $1.4 million a year in debt payments on the two garages…

    I had to confess I hadn’t read past the top of it, because it didn’t tell me anything new. I mean, we’ve been over this ground before, many times, right? I mean, the reason so many of y’all spit on the ground every time “Innovista” gets mentioned is because USC made the mistake of building those buildings right as the economy was about to crash — causing them to be under-occupied, and therefore for the parking garages attached to be underutilized.

    I guess the news in this — the “Exclusive” news — is that there are some actual numbers attached to what we already knew. I guess.

    I mean, this is the same ground I covered, yet again, in an exchange with Doug this morning. In an effort to rain on the Nephron parade, Doug wrote:

    I really hope this doesn’t turn into another Innovista marketing hype venture like so many of the announcements made by USC over the past few years…

    Of course, Doug was trying to head off exactly what I DO say about the Nephron deal, which is that it is one small step in the direction of success for Innovista. I responded to him thusly:

    Let me say it again:
    Innovista is not about those buildings.
    Innovista is not about those buildings.
    Innovista is not about those buildings.
    Innovista is not about those buildings.
    It just isn’t.

    I curse the day those buildings were conceived, because they distracted everyone from what the Innovista concept is. It’s about all sorts of investments that will take place in all sorts of physical locations, mostly centered in an area bounded by the new baseball field and the State Museum along the river, and then up to Assembly Street — but NOT limited by that. It’s about leveraging that proximity to the University to promote high-tech development throughout the Midlands. Some will locate in the Innovista proper; some won’t.

    As Innovista succeeds, many large and small investors will invest in all sorts of ways in infrastructure — from existing buildings to new. And the types of investors will include living space, restaurants and retail stores for the people who work in the research-related businesses there.

    That’s IF it succeeds. Which is hard to do when so many people spit on the ground every time its name gets mentioned.

    This IS a case of Innovista succeeding, by the way — one step in the right direction. A business first got involved with USC through Innovista, and is now expanding its business in our area, producing jobs that pay well. This is one of a number of ways that one would expect Innovista to contribute to our economy.

    Back to the garages story. For me, the pertinent part, the real perspective on this, comes at the bottom, when Wayne quotes Don Herriott, the guy hired to clean up the Innovista effort after the last guy got pushed out the door:

    … Don Herriott, director of Innovista, said the two 110,000-square-foot buildings already constructed are 40 percent occupied by researchers.

    One of those buildings should be 60 percent occupied by early next year, Herriott said. The other should be 100 percent occupied in two to three years.

    The economic downturn, which struck as the university was moving forward with Innovista, has made it difficult to get the other two buildings planned constructed, Herriott said.

    Those buildings still could be erected at some time in the future, Herriott said. But rather than stick with its original, expansive vision of Innovista, USC officials are moving forward with a stripped-down plan that focuses more on selling the benefits of having a high-tech corridor and moving researchers into existing space.

    “ ‘If you build it, they will come’ is not a business strategy,” Herriott said when he was hired last year.

    Last week, Herriott said Innovista is coming together.

    “It’s prime real estate,” he said. “There are people who want to have close proximity to the university.”

    That’s the real perspective. That’s what’s happening here. And for my part, I look forward to Innovista — the real Innovista, not those stupid buildings — continuing to take off, to the point at which the $4 million shortfalls will look like a very small price to have paid.