I think Rep. James Smith is one of the best people in the SC Legislature, and I’m glad his colleagues think so much of him. But I could do without this:
Representative James Smith to deliverDemocratic Response to State of the StateColumbia, SC – State Representative James Smith (D-Columbia) will deliver the Democratic Response to the State of the State immediately following Governor Haley’s address on Wednesday night. Representative Smith will present the Democratic vision for greater accountability and responsible leadership for South Carolina. Smith, 46, a decorated combat veteran who has served in Afghanistan, is a small business owner and attorney. He has represented district 72 in the South Carolina House of Representatives since 1997.The official Democratic response will take place immediately following the State of the State in a live press conference in the 3rd floor Senate conference room in the State House. Representative Smith will tape a message on the Democratic vision for building a stronger South Carolina earlier in the day, which will be available to all media outlets around the state and air on ETV.
I’ve really, really disliked this convention ever since it developed on the national level. It’s a formalization of our two-party disease (some call it a two-party “system;” I prefer to be more descriptive), and I don’t hold with it. The perpetual competition between the parties doesn’t deserve such ritual recognition.
If Democrats want to react to the governor’s speech, let them do so right along with Republicans and the rest of us — in man-on-the-street or lawmaker-in-the-chamber-type reaction roundups. Reverse the party names, and apply the same thought to the national level. The party out of power doesn’t have to have, and is not entitled to, a formal, separate-but-semi-equal speech, through which the media and viewers on the telly are expected to sit with the same patience and respect that they afforded to the actual, elected Chief Executive.
The people chose the governor, or president, or what have you. Who chose the responder? A caucus of party insiders.
If you want to deliver the State of the State address, get elected governor. If you want to deliver the State of the Union, get elected president. If you’re unable to do that, wait until the next election.
I suppose this release, from the state Democratic Party, is a preview of what Rep. Smith will say — or what his party expects him to say, anyway:
I do not like any of the State of the Incumbent speeches or the responses. Politicking, all of it!
Captain, I’m picking up an unusually high level of “Harrumph” on my instruments for this entire thread.
But is there enough indignation in the atmosphere to support carbon-based, ape-descended life forms, Spock?
Heavy sigh. The Democratic Party should lay out a vision of what needs to be done. The Democratic Party should be upbeat, congratulating our governor on what she has done to make things better in South Carolina. For criticism, the Democratic Party should talk about only one issue, how the Republicans, led by Gov. Haley, have refused the Medicaid money, which would go to the doctors and hospitals for work that they will have to do anyway.
What about the Mayor vowing to close Five Points to vehicles on weekends? He sprung it on city staff and the folks who own businesses in FP or live nearby. Glad we don’t have a “strong” mayor.
Nobody wants it except USC.
Gov. Haley was mostly great. Rep Smith was OK, not bad at all, but, yes, unnecessary. I liked seeing Sen. Peeler afterwards plan on taking the ball and running with it to improve education and infrastructure.
I loved Harvey’s comment, on ETV Radio, that Haley “still has that new-car smell.” Not for nothing is he the best Tweeter in the Senate!
This moved via email last night:
“South Carolina deserves leadership that does not expose our private financial information to hackers and criminals and then cost tens of millions in our tax payer dollars to protect what could have been protected for free.”
I’d like to see the explanation of the word “free” .
With all the talk about how awful Republicans are, how they were shooting themselves in the foot with their actions on the government shutdown and Obamacare, and how they are “at war” with women and minorities, there is this reality check from a leading pollster (Larry Sabato):
“We now favor Republicans in four Democratic-held seats: Montana, South Dakota and West Virginia, as well as — in a ratings change — Arkansas, where Sen. Mark Pryor (D) appears to be at least a slight underdog to Rep. Tom Cotton (R) in a reddening state. Assuming Republicans can win those, they have roughly even odds to win in three other states where there are Democratic incumbents: Alaska, which we’ve long classified as a Toss-up, and Louisiana and North Carolina, which we’re switching back to Toss-ups after having them in that category for much of last year. It’s possible that the race for the Senate will come down to these three Toss-ups, with the party that wins at least two of the three controlling the Senate.”
There isn’t a single Senate seat expected to switch from Republican to Democrat. There is at least a 50-50 chance right now that Republicans will take control of both houses of Congress.
Unless Obamacare recovers soon and shows real progress, this is likely going to be a very bad year for Obama and Democrats.