Category Archives: Uncategorized

GOP’s loving this: Larry Flynt backs Rob Miller

You didn’t read it here first — Adam had it in one of his TPS reports — but poor (I say “poor” figuratively, since he’s sitting on a multi-million-dollar warchest) Rob Miller has a nightmare supporter: Larry Flynt.

After calling Joe Wilson a rude name that we don’t use on family blogs, the purveyor of Hustler, wrote on his blog (along with other stuff I won’t repeat):

Make a donation to Rob Miller, Joe Wilson’s Democratic opponent in the 2010 elections. (Miller’s Web site is RobMillerForCongress.com.)

Yes, Larry Flynt’s blog. Just knowing he, too, is a blogger kinda makes me feel… grubby. It really IS an anyone-can-play medium, isn’t it?

The Journalist of the Year’s Tweets on GOP hopefuls

sanford-press-conf-hammond

First, congratulations to John O’Connor for winning the state Press Association’s Journalist of the Year award. It’s well deserved. John, who can be seen above at the infamous Sanford press conference (that’s him on the crutches next to me), has had a busy year.

Speaking of John, I just noticed that he’s been Tweeting the results of Republican primary filings. Here’s what he’s posted:

Will update candidate filing as I get it. GOP Comptroller General Richard Eckstrom has picked up primary and general election opposition.     25 minutes ago   via TweetDeck

Got a full list of GOP candidates for S.C. statewide and Congressional offices.     8 minutes ago   via TweetDeck

Governor, no surprises: Bauer, Barrett, Haley, McMaster     8 minutes ago   via TweetDeck

Lt. Governor: Ken Ard, Krista Cogdill, Bill Connor, Eleanor Kitzman, Larry Richter     6 minutes ago   via TweetDeck

Sec. of State: Mark Hammond unopposed     6 minutes ago   via TweetDeck

Treasurer: Converse Chellis (i) and Curtis Loftis     6 minutes ago   via TweetDeck

Attorney General: Robert Bolchoz, Leighton Lord and Alan Wilson     5 minutes ago   via TweetDeck

Comptroller General: Richard Eckstrom (i) and Mike Meilinger     5 minutes ago   via TweetDeck

Super. of Ed.: Gary Burgess, Kelly Payne, Mick Zais, Elizabeth Moffly, Glenn Price, Brent Nelson     4 minutes ago   via TweetDeck

Commissioner of Agriculture: Hugh Weathers unnopposed     3 minutes ago   via TweetDeck

And Bob Livingston gets no primary opposition for the open Adjutant General seat.     3 minutes ago   via TweetDeck

For U.S. Senate, Jim DeMint picks up a primary opponent in Susan Gaddy.     32 minutes ago   via TweetDeck

Awesome car, Mr. Frey! (a brief eulogy)

1964-mustang-rc

One of the greats — Donald N. Frey — has passed. Don’t know who Donald Frey was? Well, neither did I, until Roger Ebert brought him to my attention a few minutes ago. He died March 5, and this story I’m linking to was posted on Sunday, but now that I finally know, I’m letting you know:

29frey_CA0-popup

Donald N. Frey with a '66 convertible.

Donald N. Frey, the engineer who spearheaded the design and development of the Mustang, the spunky, stylish, affordably priced “pony car” that the Ford Motor Company rolled out in the mid-1960s in one of the most successful car introductions in automotive history, died March 5 in Evanston, Ill., where he lived. He was 86.

The cause was a stroke, his son Christopher said.

Though much of the Mustang was borrowed from other Ford vehicles, including a Falcon chassis, the car developed an identity all its own for a younger generation in search of new looks and experiences. It was designed to appeal to both men and women, had a dash of elegance copied from European sports cars, and featured a galloping steed in the middle of its grille that buyers thought was, well, really cool.

Steve McQueen was almost upstaged by the souped-up Mustang he drove in the movie “Bullitt.”…

Absolutely. In fact, as cool as Steve indisputably was in that one, I sort of thought the car WAS the star of the movie.

The Mustang, of course, was the anti-Edsel. If the Edsel was Ford’s greatest failure, the Mustang was its greatest triumph — at least since the Model T. And frankly, I’d much rather drive the Mustang.

Not a recent model Mustang, of course — they hardly deserve the name — but one of the early ones, preferably a ’64 1/2, like the first one I ever saw.

It was parked in front of the Tennis Club in Guayaquil, Ecuador, where I lived from 1962-65. It was a solid, concrete example of everything exciting that was going on back in the States without me. Seeing it was like hearing my first Beatles song — an explanation, and justification, of all of the buzz I’d been hearing.

It was dramatically different from every car I’d ever seen, and the difference was magical. It was like… there were dances, then there was the Twist. There were pop groups, then there were the Beatles. There were cars, then there was the Mustang.

I didn’t know you, Mr. Frey, but that was one awesome car you brought into being!

Now, enjoy the song…

Congratulations, Gov. Sanford!

I thought that headline would grab you.

But congratulations are in order, as the governor signs legislation giving himself some control of the state unemployment agency. Finally, after eight long years of waiting, the governor signs a tiny piece of the kind of government restructuring that he ran on in 2002 (which was the largest positive reason why we endorsed him at the time; another was his commitment to transparency, but let’s not go into that right now).

This congratulatory message, however, is weighted down by several caveats:

  • As a long-time unemployed person myself, it’s hard for me to imagine a person I would less want to be in charge of the unemployment insurance apparatus. This is a guy who, when our state’s pitifully inadequate benefit payments outstrip the pitiful amounts this state has been putting into the fund over the years, immediately wants to accuse the agency of wrongdoing, of being spendthrifts. It doesn’t occur to him that more than 12 percent of South Carolinians are out of work (actually, the numbers much higher — I am among the many thousands who removed themselves from being counted when I got out of the system last September), and if it did occur to him it wouldn’t matter, because he doesn’t really care, near as I can tell.
  • The Legislature has made this move not BECAUSE Mark Sanford is governor, but IN SPITE OF that fact. In other words, he can’t claim any credit. That lawmakers made this move with him in office is testimony to the royal cock-up that the ESC has made of the situation.
  • Only Mark Sanford could have made the Employment Security Commissioners look good. But he accomplished that, by utterly ignoring the agency until it became politically advantageous to him to start bashing it. You can read about that here. Unfortunately, the rather compelling video that supported that column is no longer up. (I made the mistake of putting up some videos on The State’s service rather than YouTube for awhile, and all of those have disappeared.)

All of that said, this was needed reform for the following reasons, among others:

  • All executive department agencies should report to the governor, who is the elected chief executive. The fragmentation of authority we have in South Carolina — and the ESC, with its commissioners appointed by the Legislature, is one of the poster children — makes it impossible to hold anyone accountable when things go wrong.
  • Things HAVE gone wrong at the ESC. Yes, the Legislature has failed to fill the coffers sufficiently to be prepared for this infernally long rainy day, but the commissioners were derelict in their duty to make that fact clear.

Anyway, all of that said, congratulations, governor. And I can hardly wait until we have a NEW governor, who will actually have the credibility and mandate to move that critical agency into the kind of safety net that our state’s workers need.

Then there were TWO ads on the blog…

But y’all knew that, right? I mean, y’all are smart folks who can count that high and even higher, without even taking your shoes off. So I guess I’m just braggin’ about the booming business I’m doing all of a sudden.

Now, I’ve just got to get those penny-pinching mayoral candidates to get with the program. The State says “Mayoral candidates emptying war chests on ads,” but you sure can’t tell it by me

I take it (or SOME of it) back about Robert Ford

And when I say “Robert Ford,” I’m not talking about the dirty little coward who shot Mr. Howard. Speaking of which, did you see that excellent movie with Brad Pitt as Jesse James and Casey Affleck as Bob Ford? If you haven’t, you should. Watch the trailer. And when I say Jesse James, I don’t mean the celebrity-by-marriage with a thing for tattoos, but the REAL Jesse James.

Where was I?

Oh, yes — I’m going to stop being so dismissive of Sen. Robert Ford.

This is going to require an adjustment on my part, because it’s hard to adopt any other pose toward a candidate whose answer to everything is to reinstate the sleazy industry that we all worked so hard to be rid of — video poker.

But adjust I must, after Sen. Ford introduced a bill that would do the following:

AMEND THE CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, BY ADDING SECTION 59-101-45 SO AS TO PROVIDE THAT ALL MEMBERS OF THE BOARDS OF TRUSTEES OF ALL PUBLIC COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES OF THIS STATE MUST BE APPOINTED BY THE GOVERNOR UPON THE ADVICE AND CONSENT OF THE SENATE, TO PROVIDE FOR THE EXPIRATION OF THE TERMS OF OFFICE OF CURRENT BOARD MEMBERS, TO PROVIDE FOR THE TERM LENGTH AND COMMENCEMENT OF TERMS OF NEWLY APPOINTED BOARD MEMBERS, AND TO PROVIDE THAT THE SENATE SHALL CONVENE A COMMITTEE TO SCREEN POTENTIAL CANDIDATES FOR THE RESPECTIVE BOARDS.

The shocking thing is that this would actually represent reform. It’s not quite the reform we need — what we need is a board of regents to govern the entire public higher education system. But this would actually be a step in the right direction.

Apparently, Sen. Ford has figured out that a governor could actually be held accountable for the makeup of the boards. With the current setup, that’s impossible. You can’t hold 170 people accountable for anything, and you certainly can’t do so with the overall makeup of the boards, when all lawmakers get to do is make isolated decisions, position by position, according to who runs for each seat when it comes available.

Now, making sure there are minorities on the USC board of trustees is not THE reason to put this huge portion of the executive branch under the elected chief executive, but it’s a side benefit.

For years, one of the biggest obstacles to restructuring to make state government more accountable has been the Legislative Black Caucus. But I’ve noticed that some members of that caucus have started realizing that a governor could be held accountable for demographics, whereas a legislature can’t be. And not only within the executive branch — a governor could be held accountable for the overall demographics of his judicial nominees, were he allowed to nominate judges.

Just another illustration of the main thing about a Legislative State — it is the kind of government that is MOST resistant to change, whether you’re talking policy change or making your government look more like your state.

By the way, if you want restructuring, don’t vote for Sen. Ford, despite this promising proposal. In the Democratic primary, the guy you’d want to go with is Vincent Sheheen, who has been pushing for restructuring for years. He gets it. And he has a chance to win. If I were to base my vote on restructuring (which I may, even though I got burned with Mark Sanford doing that), I’d definitely go with Vincent.

Your Front Page, Monday, March 29, 2010

You’ll notice that I try to get the Monday page to you by midday rather than late afternoon, because I figure by now you’re jonesing for some hard news:

  1. Moscow Metro hit by deadly suicide bombings — Just last night, I was remarking to my wife how it had been a really long time since there had been a successful terrorist attack in this West. I should have known better. Of course, this isn’t in the West, and it’s not al Qaeda, but still. Irrelevant thing that occurred to me reading about this: I didn’t know that Chechens were sufficiently screwed up in the head to go in for suicide bombing. I guess I just hadn’t been paying attention.
  2. Agencies Suspect Iran Is Planning More Atomic Sites — Just in case you didn’t have enough to worry about.
  3. 9 Tied to Militia Charged in Plot to Murder Officers — A little home-grown terrorism in the mix…
  4. Obama returns from Afghan trip — The president got on Hamid Karzai’s case while he was there.
  5. Mayoral candidates emptying war chests on ads — This might not seem front page-worthy, but I didn’t have anything else local. And this  also gives me the chance to gripe, You can’t tell it by ME. While Tony Mizzell has taken out an ad on the blog, and I’ve had an inquiry this morning from another council candidate, I haven’t heard from the mayoral candidates…
  6. Fatty foods may cause cocaine-like addiction — According to Health.com, a new study in rats suggests that high-fat, high-calorie foods affect the brain in much the same way as cocaine and heroin.

Hey, whatever happened to that Scott Brown guy?

Not much, it seems. It wouldn’t have occurred to me even to wonder if it hadn’t been brought to my attention by the Wonkette via Twitter this morning:

Scott Brown, remember that guy? He was the Naked Senator, the 41st Vote, the 57th state, all the teabagger dreams realized and brought to life in the handsome form of some hairy-bellied Golem from the pages of a 1980s issue of Cosmopolitan. It was as if he drove that dumb mini pickup straight out to Hyannis Port, dug up Ted Kennedy and punched him in the mouth, even though Ted Kennedy is actually buried at Arlington National Cemetery. Oh yeah, and Health Care Reform passed — it’s the law now, in America. Scott Brown didn’t do shit.

Pardon the language; the Wonkette is one of those less-mature blogs that thinks she has to talk that way to be one of the cool kids. But she (or it, or however you refer to a blog that is no longer produced by the original author) brings up an interesting point. Remember when Republicans such as our own Mark Sanford (who ran up breathlessly to Washington in the hope of meeting him) were just gaga over this guy?

Now, they’re less enchanted, as The Boston Herald (characterized by Wonkette as “the same right-leaning tough-guy tabloid that endorsed and promoted Brown’s whole unlikely rise to the Senate”) has documented in a cover story:

Republican folk hero Sen. Scott Brown is being taunted by triumphant Democrats — and slammed by irked scott_brown_heraldconservatives — after the historic health-care bill he was elected to kill was signed into law by President Obama yesterday.

“If he were a milk carton, he would be expired,” said Massachusetts Democratic Party chairman John Walsh.

Brown’s backers from the insurgent Tea Party movement want to know if they’ve been had.

“We start to wonder whether we helped a RINO (Republican in name only) get into office,” said Tea Party activist Jeffrey McQueen, who traveled from Michigan to campaign for Brown in the final days of the Jan. 19 special election that rocked the nation.

Media sensations just come and go so quickly, don’t they?

Move over Pacific Islanders, here come the Rebs!

Hey, all you increasingly angry white folks? Do you find waving snake flags at Tea Parties still leaves you surprisingly unfulfilled?

Well a group called the “Southern Legal Resource Center” (not to be confused with the Southern Poverty Law Center, although that would seem to be the intent) is suggesting a way that you can get what you’ve always wanted, deep down: The chance to be a member of your very own, federally-recognized, aggrieved minority group:

Declare ‘Confederate Southern American’ on Census forms, group says

By Rhonda Cook

The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

The Southern Legal Resource Center is calling on self-proclaimed “Confederates” to declare their heritage when they are counted in the 2010 Census.

The organization is urging Southerners to declare their “heritage and culture” by classifying themselves as “Confederate Southern Americans” on the line on the form, question No. 9, that asks for race. Check “other” and write “Confed Southern Am” on the line beside it, the group says on its Facebook  page and on two YouTube videos.

“A significant number of Southerners identifying themselves as Confederate Southern Americans on the Census form could finally spell the beginning of the end for the discrimination that has been running rampant, especially for the last 20 years or so, against all things Confederate, and for that matter against Southern heritage and identity in general,” SLRC executive director Roger McCredie said in a written statement.

He said this campaign could result in protections for “Confederate Southern Americans” much like those for other groups.

I was recently taken to task by a regular for referring to people as “neo-Confederates” and such. Will it be all right for me to do so if they officially designate themselves as such? I would think so. In fact, I would think I could leave out the “neo”…

Congrats to Tony Mizzell, my first advertiser!

Radford High School didn’t graduate any fools in 1971; you can’t put anything over on my classmate Burl. He noticed right away, and commented back here:

The really big news — your blog has a display ad!

I responded to him:

Yep, my very first. That’s the Papa ad. Soon as I have a Mama ad, I hope they’ll have lots of baby ads.

As you see at right, Tony Mizzell, candidate for Columbia City Council, is my first advertiser. This is due in no small part, I’m sure, to the fact that Tony knows what he’s doing. Tony is the vice president for interactive marketing at Chernoff Newman. So of course he’s going to make a savvy move like this.

I congratulate him on his acumen, and for being the very first to take advantage of this exciting new advertising venue. May it bring him lots of additional exposure. And folks, if you happen to live in his district and you run into him, be sure to tell him you saw his ad here.

I also want to congratulate Tony for winning the endorsement of my friends at The State. He was the recipient of the very first political endorsement since I left the paper. While reserving judgment on who should win that race, I told Warren and Cindi that I thought they did a good job on the endorsement. It did just what an endorsement should do — it presented logical reasons for their choice, inviting readers in the 4th district to think harder about their choice, whomever they vote for. You should go read it.

Personally, I’m just starting to focus on that race. Today, I had coffee for about an hour and a half with Leona Plaugh at the Woodhill Starbucks. I’ll write about that sometime this weekend. I’ll be meeting with Tony for breakfast Tuesday, and I’m trying to get something set up with Kevin Fisher. Those three are the best-known candidates for that seat, which is being vacated by Kirkman Finlay III.

Your Front Page, Friday, March 26, 2010

Today, the hard news is heavily weighted toward national/international:

  1. Allawi Bloc Wins Iraq Elections, in Upset — This is our lede. Now we’ll see if the country can weather the first big test of a modern democracy — a peaceful handover of power.
  2. Obama, Medvedev Sign Off On New Nuclear Pact — This would have been the lede most days, but it was well foreshadowed yesterday.
  3. State’s unemployment rate stays at 12.5% in February — More of the same, folks.
  4. Haley legislation passes, but without Haley — Hey, why not tout a story of my own?
  5. Twitter’s “Kind Pirate” Arrested in France — Just a little something to cleanse the palate, a change of pace.
  6. McCain, Palin reunite for high-stakes campaign stump in Ariz. — Sigh. McCain’s never going to live this woman down. And apparently, he doesn’t want to.

Nikki missed big roll call vote on roll call voting

Nikki Haley is rightly proud that, after a two-year battle in which she took considerable risk taking on the powers that be in the House, that body passed her bill requiring roll-call votes.

There’s just one ironic little fun-fact-to-know about that passage: Nikki herself was not present for the roll-call vote on roll-call voting.

Really.

Anyway, here’s the release her campaign put out yesterday touting her triumph:

Haley’s Bill Requiring All Legislators to Vote on The Record Passes the House

Friends –

I wanted to quickly share some great news.

After a two year battle to get legislators to vote on the record – and after being punished by House leadership for her fight – Nikki’s Spending Accountability Act, requiring all legislators to be accountable to the people they serve, passed the House today.

Below is the campaign’s press release, with comments from Nikki:

###

Nikki Haley released the following statement on the House’ passage of H.3047, the Spending Accountability Act:

Columbia, SC – “Today is a great day for the voters and taxpayers of South Carolina.  Almost two full years ago, I introduced this bill because our legislators were voting anonymously more than 90% of the time and the citizens of our state could not see the spending habits of their elected officials,” Haley said.  “The House has now voted – unanimously – to make it permanent law that every single vote will be on the record, and I couldn’t be more proud to have helped bring this historic change about.”

Getting to this point has not been easy, and those of us who fought have the scars to prove it, but at the end of the day the House has now recognized that legislative votes belong to the people, not to elected officials, and that is a huge win for South Carolina,” Haley continued.

I would like to thank my colleagues in the House who saw the importance of making their votes transparent to the people they serve, and specifically thank Rep. Nathan Ballentine, the only Member who fought with me on this bill from the very beginning.  I urge the senate to follow our lead in passing this bill, and to do so quickly,” Haley finished.

Chad Walldorf, Chairman of SC Club for Growth, commented on the passage of Haley’s bill.  “Today’s passage of stronger on the record voting requirements is a hard-fought victory for South Carolina taxpayers,” Walldorf said.  “In particular, Rep. Nikki Haley’s diligence in passing the legislation shows her commitment to transparency and accountability – two principles we need more of in Columbia. She deserves huge credit for shaking up the way things have been done for too long.”

Now, more than ever, the people need to see exactly what their elected officials are doing,” said Talbert Black, State Coordinator for the Campaign for Liberty.  “This has been a long struggle, and it’s not over yet, but what happened today is a huge step forward in terms of getting South Carolina taxpayers the kind of government we deserve.”

H.3047 will now move to the South Carolina Senate.

###
She and her campaign are justly proud.

I had already known about the vote, though, from the Twitter messages I had received all day — the ones flying out of the State House noting that Nikki had missed the vote.

This was acknowledged in the journal with this notation:

RECORD FOR VOTINGI was temporarily out of the Chamber during the vote on H. 3047. If I had been present, I would have voted in favor of the Bill.

Rep. Nikki Haley

I’m sure she was disappointed not to be there…

Frum fired by think tank for sin of thinking?

He says not. He says it had nothing to do with his Waterloo blog post, that it was just a matter of hard times. But the timing would naturally make one suspicious.

Twenty-three hours ago, David Frum was still trying to preach reason to his fellow Republicans, with this Tweet:

Anger is Not a Solution: The American people don’t care about accusations of socialism, they care about results. http://bit.ly/9dyg4P #tcot about 23 hours ago via twitterfeed

Two hours later, he was posting this:

AEI Says Goodbye: I have been a resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute since 2003. At lunch tod… http://bit.ly/cXMtib #tcot about 21 hours ago via twitterfeed

This rather naturally led observers to think he was fired for departing from the increasingly strident, increasingly extreme orthodoxy of his party.

But he says not. He says, in fact, that the guy who canned him “welcomed and celebrated” the Waterloo piece. Hmmm.

Here, by the way, is Mr. Frum’s resignation letter to AEI President Arthur Brooks:

Dear Arthur,

This will memorialize our conversation at lunch today. Effective immediately, my position as a resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute is terminated. I appreciate the consideration that delays my emptying of my office until after my return from travel next week. Premises will be vacated no later than April 9.

I have had many fruitful years at the American Enterprise Institute, and I do regret this abrupt and unexpected conclusion of our relationship.

Very truly yours,

David Frum

Whatever the case, there’s no doubt that the arbiters of the new orthodoxy were on his case for daring to speak reason to those who are out of power.

The Wall Street Journal had already expressed the displeasure of the Mark Sanford wing of the party (of which they are the purest expression, even more so than AEI) in an editorial that among other things said:

Mr. Frum now makes his living as the media’s go-to basher of fellow Republicans, which is a stock Beltway role….

That, of course, is the ultimate sin on the right, and has been since the days of Spiro Agnew.

Your front page, Thursday, March 25, 2010

Here are the top stories as of late afternoon:

  1. Cromartie election will be April 6 after all — I hate leading with this since it was in the morning paper, but for Columbia readers it’s still the most significant breaking development. Don’t know how I didn’t have this in yesterday’s edition — I need to find out when it broke.
  2. Senate Approves Last Piece of Health Overhaul — Putting on the finishing touches. Meanwhile, POTUS hits the hustings to ‘splain to Mr. and Mrs. America why health care reform is a good thing. Mr. and Mrs. America, according to polls, are a bit slow on the uptake…
  3. A Special Tag for Big Red? — I’ve already addressed  this subject today.
  4. Pope accused of failing to act on sex abuse case — More allegations of failures on the part of Cardinal Ratzinger before he became the head guy.
  5. France Backs German Plan on Greece Aid — Europe getting its act together on helping out the Grecians, as our former president knew them.
  6. Suspected Bank Robber Jumps off Bridge Over Congaree, Survives — That pretty much says it all. You know, since The State started making John Monk do cops beat, he’s come up with some that rise above the ordinary. This story, by the way, is a classic example of something that would make the front in an afternoon paper, then get buried the next morning. Traditionally. But newspapers don’t follow those traditional patterns any more.

Last thing SC needs is another license plate

We could debate all day what should be done with the “Big Red” flag believed to be the one that Citadel cadets flew when committing the most disastrous, inexcusable, violent act of student unrest in U.S. history.

But there’s one thing that doesn’t need any debate: South Carolina doesn’t need any more special license plates. Have you seen the latest?:

‘Big Red’ flag tag could preserve Civil War banner

The Associated Press

COLUMBIA, S.C. — The “Big Red” flag linked to South Carolina military school cadets firing on a Union ship before the Civil War could be preserved with the help of a new state license tag.

State Rep. Chip Limehouse on Wednesday introduced a bill that issues a special tag that would bear the image of the red banner with white Palmetto tree and crescent.

Limehouse said it would help the state pay for proper storage and preservation of the banner said to have flown when cadets from The Citadel fired on the Star of the West on Jan. 9, 1861 as it tried to resupply a garrison.

What’s believed to be the original flag is on loan to The Citadel from the Iowa State Historical Museum.

This business of the state of South Carolina acting as the fund-raiser for various private entities and causes got out of hand long ago. Having so many different plates has seriously undermined the purpose of a state license plate, which is quick identification for law enforcement purposes.

Let’s draw the line here.

Today’s Front Page, Wednesday, March 24, 2010

Here you go:

  1. Russia and U.S. Report Breakthrough on Arms Pact — Obama and Medvedev have achieved a dramatic breakthrough in negotiations, and now expect to sign a new treaty in Prague next month that would slash American and Russian nuclear arsenals.
  2. US-Israel talks fail to solve row — Summit between Barack and Bibi fail to end tensions over settlements, failing to end what the BBC terms “the worst crisis in US-Israeli ties for decades.” Meanwhile the settlements move forward.
  3. Black lawmakers urging football recruits to not play at USC — This story combines three incredible things: 1) that there is no black USC trustee; 2) that black caucus members could be THIS petulant about the fact; and 3) that anyone would care who plays or doesn’t play at USC. Well, at least No. 3 is meaningful to me.
  4. GoDaddy.com plans to stop registering domain names in China — The world’s largest domain name registration company (it’s where I bought “bradwarthen.com”) isn’t going to leave Google out there hanging, but will refuse to put up with “new government rules that require applicants to provide extensive personal data, including photographs of themselves.”
  5. Actor Robert Culp Dead at 79 — Remember “I Spy,” which launched Bill Cosby?
  6. Parents’ smoking gives 15,000 children a year asthma, doctors warn — And that’s just in the UK, according to a new study.

Also-rans: Neither of these significant stories quite made the front: Pope Accepts Irish Bishop’s Resignation in Abuse Scandal; and Saudis Arrest 113 Militants Said to Have Qaeda Ties. The smoking thing bumped them both…

Mowing Green South Carolina

23778_102158919824176_102158083157593_18592_6341221_n

Normally I don’t agree to become a “fan” of anything on Facebook, but I made an exception when I saw this neat idea:

Mowing Green South Carolina Hello friends; Bob Amundson here. I decided to start this business

Bob Amundson

Bob Amundson

because of how much lawn mowers and other fossil fueled lawn care equipment pollute our environment. I use only reel mowers, battery operated mowers and lawn equipment to minimize the carbon footprint lawn care creates in Columbia.

If you are interested in caring for your lawn at reasonable prices, call me! I will match or beat what you are paying your current company! If you can not reach me at my phone listed on “information” feel free to call me on my cell phone, 803.479.8815.

Additional contact info:

964 Laurie Lane
Columbia, SC, 29205-4423
803.740.2373

I’d hire him to cut my lawn, but I’m sure I can’t afford it in my current state of pecuniary strangulation. At least, I’m sure I don’t have the amount of money you’d have to pay ME to get me to cut my hilly three-quarters of an acre with a manual reel mower.

But maybe some of y’all can avail yourself of Mr. Amundson’s services and report back to us on the experience.

And no, this is not a paid ad. This is another product placement for which I am not being compensated. I just thought it was a cool idea, and one worth sharing.

That Frum piece deserves to be read in full

You know what? That David Frum blog post I referred to earlier deserves to be read in full. It’s very refreshing. It reminds us that it is possible for a Republican to think and express himself clearly, to make actual sense. And it’s been a long time since we’ve seen much sign of that. So enjoy this rare specimen:

Waterloo

March 21st, 2010 at 4:59 pm by David Frum | No Comments |

Conservatives and Republicans today suffered their most crushing legislative defeat since the 1960s.

It’s hard to exaggerate the magnitude of the disaster. Conservatives may cheer themselves that they’ll compensate for today’s expected vote with a big win in the November 2010 elections. But:

(1) It’s a good bet that conservatives are over-optimistic about November – by then the economy will have improved and the immediate goodies in the healthcare bill will be reaching key voting blocs.

(2) So what? Legislative majorities come and go. This healthcare bill is forever. A win in November is very poor compensation for this debacle now.

So far, I think a lot of conservatives will agree with me. Now comes the hard lesson:

A huge part of the blame for today’s disaster attaches to conservatives and Republicans ourselves.

At the beginning of this process we made a strategic decision: unlike, say, Democrats in 2001 when President Bush proposed his first tax cut, we would make no deal with the administration. No negotiations, no compromise, nothing. We were going for all the marbles. This would be Obama’s Waterloo – just as healthcare was Clinton’s in 1994.

Only, the hardliners overlooked a few key facts: Obama was elected with 53% of the vote, not Clinton’s 42%. The liberal block within the Democratic congressional caucus is bigger and stronger than it was in 1993-94. And of course the Democrats also remember their history, and also remember the consequences of their 1994 failure.

This time, when we went for all the marbles, we ended with none.

Could a deal have been reached? Who knows? But we do know that the gap between this plan and traditional Republican ideas is not very big. The Obama plan has a broad family resemblance to Mitt Romney’s Massachusetts plan. It builds on ideas developed at the Heritage Foundation in the early 1990s that formed the basis for Republican counter-proposals to Clintoncare in 1993-1994.

Barack Obama badly wanted Republican votes for his plan. Could we have leveraged his desire to align the plan more closely with conservative views? To finance it without redistributive taxes on productive enterprise – without weighing so heavily on small business – without expanding Medicaid? Too late now. They are all the law.

No illusions please: This bill will not be repealed. Even if Republicans scored a 1994 style landslide in November, how many votes could we muster to re-open the “doughnut hole” and charge seniors more for prescription drugs? How many votes to re-allow insurers to rescind policies when they discover a pre-existing condition? How many votes to banish 25 year olds from their parents’ insurance coverage? And even if the votes were there – would President Obama sign such a repeal?

We followed the most radical voices in the party and the movement, and they led us to abject and irreversible defeat.

There were leaders who knew better, who would have liked to deal. But they were trapped. Conservative talkers on Fox and talk radio had whipped the Republican voting base into such a frenzy that deal-making was rendered impossible. How do you negotiate with somebody who wants to murder your grandmother? Or – more exactly – with somebody whom your voters have been persuaded to believe wants to murder their grandmother?

I’ve been on a soapbox for months now about the harm that our overheated talk is doing to us. Yes it mobilizes supporters – but by mobilizing them with hysterical accusations and pseudo-information, overheated talk has made it impossible for representatives to represent and elected leaders to lead. The real leaders are on TV and radio, and they have very different imperatives from people in government. Talk radio thrives on confrontation and recrimination. When Rush Limbaugh said that he wanted President Obama to fail, he was intelligently explaining his own interests. What he omitted to say – but what is equally true – is that he also wants Republicans to fail. If Republicans succeed – if they govern successfully in office and negotiate attractive compromises out of office – Rush’s listeners get less angry. And if they are less angry, they listen to the radio less, and hear fewer ads for Sleepnumber beds.

So today’s defeat for free-market economics and Republican values is a huge win for the conservative entertainment industry. Their listeners and viewers will now be even more enraged, even more frustrated, even more disappointed in everybody except the responsibility-free talkers on television and radio. For them, it’s mission accomplished. For the cause they purport to represent, it’s Waterloo all right: ours.

If more Republicans started thinking and speaking this way, instead of showing their fannies to get the tea partiers to cheer, Democrats would be in trouble. But the Dems need not fear; expect rational, civil voices such as Mr. Frum’s to be shouted down.

Will DeMint lead Republicans to THEIR Waterloo?

Couple of things that jumped out at me this morning….

I saw Jim “Waterloo” DeMint’s picture on the front of The State, still out front leading the charge against the health care reform that is now the law of the land. (Oddly, I couldn’t find an actual story about that to link to; there was just that blurb on the front. But here’s his press release.)

Then I heard on NPR, the following passage from the same story I referred you to in my previous post:

Waterloo For The GOP?

Earlier this week, David Frum, a former speechwriter for President George W. Bush, angered many of his fellow conservatives when he wrote a blog post criticizing Republicans for putting all of their effort into killing the bill, rather than working with the White House to make it more palatable to the GOP. That miscalculation, Frum wrote, turned the health care bill into “Waterloo” for Republicans.

Frum’s view is very unpopular in conservative circles. Erick Erickson, who runs the Web site RedState.com, says Frum is wrong. He says Republicans stuck by their core principles and should be applauded. In defeat, he says, there is a way forward.

“I’ve been telling people not to get mad, get even,” Erickson says. “We need to replace the Democrats who voted for this with Republicans.”

Could Frum be right? Could it be that the steady negativity, the constant tone of being ticked off at everything, of constantly tearing down and never building up, of promising to drag the country BACK through the nasty debate we just had, boomerang to hurt Republicans?

Could, indeed, the mentality that led Jim DeMint to make his own infamous Waterloo remark — the attitude that what matters is not health care, but delivering a defeat to Barack Obama (because they really, really don’t like him) — lead to a setback for the GOP?

Frankly, nothing is likely to keep Republicans from making some gains in November, because that’s the way of the world: a sitting president’s party loses ground in the off-year elections. But I believe they’d do a lot better if they’d find a positive message for once.

As for DeMint himself, he’ll be re-elected. The math is just too much in his favor. An incumbent Republican is not going to lose a U.S. Senate election in South Carolina with a Democrat in the White House — factors which have nothing to do with Jim DeMint; he’s just the undeserving beneficiary.

And you know what the worst news is? He’ll be re-elected, and Republicans will make some modest gains in congressional elections, and they will think it’s BECAUSE of their constantly negative yammering, not in spite of it. And Jim DeMint will be seen as a leader of that movement. They’ll be more convinced than ever that that “get mad; get even” garbage is the winning formula for them.

Of course, what that will do is lead them into a fatal error — a Waterloo, if you will — two years later. Parties never learn. From moveon.org to RedState.com, they think it’s all about feeding anger, about getting people ticked off and keeping them that way.

They would be far better off — and so would the country — if they’d heed Mr. Frum’s advice and come up with a positive message for a change. Stop carrying water for the health insurance industry. Stop trying to lie down in front of reforms that, imperfect as they are, are sorely needed by the people of this country. Stop pandering to the racist discontent of fringe political movements. Move to the center, run something positive up the flagpole, and lead.

I offer that advice for free — knowing that these folks will never take it.

Today’s Front Page, March 23, 2010

Here are the six stories I’d put on the front page if I had a front page to put them on — which, come to think of it, I do — it just doesn’t look like this one or this one (and mine’s way more interactive):

Google Defies China on Web — That was the headline at the top of the WSJ this morning. Now, the story has moved on beyond that, to the initial ramifications of Google’s bold move to provide uncensored Web access to the world’s biggest nation. But I’m sticking with this morning’s headline because it captures the historic importance.

President Obama signs landmark health bill into law — That’s fairly self-explanatory. But for MORE explanation, here’s another site with “what it means to you” info, to add to the ones I gave you yesterday. In case you haven’t picked up on the fact, this is a big f___ing deal… Also, check out this sidebar:

Congressman Spratt defends vote on health care — You know how the Republicans are planning on using the health care vote as a bludgeon against Democrats in the fall? The one South Carolinian who would be affected by that would be John Spratt, which makes this Rock Hill story worth checking out.

Britain expels Israeli diplomat over Dubai passport row — Remember the highly professional assassination in Dubai that left such a huge footprint? The Brits are ticked that some of the forged passports were theirs. Or at least, they’re saying they’re ticked, which they sort of have to do, don’t they?

Obama to hold talks with Netanyahu amid Jerusalem row — Continuing to track this momentous showdown between the U.S. and it’s steadiest ally in the Mideast. That link is to a BBC story, but you might also want to check out the one at the WashPost, which features a picture of Bibi standing near our own Jim Clyburn…

Katie Brochu new Richland 2 superintendent — This is getting a little stale now, because it was released yesterday, but it’s still a significant local story. Here’s hoping she can run the district as well as Steve Hefner, one of the state’s best, did.