Sept. 11, 1 p.m. — OK, I’m really going to try to keep these endorsement interview posts shorter so that I can get them done and not fall behind the way I did in the last couple of election cycles (resorting to such cheap tricks as running nothing but pictures when I ran out of time).
David Herndon should be a good one for me to practice this new resolution on, since he didn’t have that much to say different from what he said in our primary interview. (And that’s not a bad thing at all, since we ended up endorsing him then.)
An overview of what we talked about:
- He said he was better qualified for the House because of his experience in business and in life.
- He said opponent Anton Gunn — a "super nice guy" is less qualified because he’s spent his work life out of the private sector, in politics and the community organizer field.
- He feels very comfortable with his district. He said that (like Caesar’s Gaul), there are three distinct communities within the Kershaw-Richland district, and at various times he’s lived in all of them.
- He thinks the governor’s trying to get the Legislature to come back to prioritize budget cuts is political posturing.
- On education, he agrees with most of Jim Rex’s proposals. He sees himself as having a broad perspective on the issue, with one child in military school, another home-schooled, and one in public elementary school.
- He sees his job as maintaining his district’s attraction for economic development and as an attractive place to live.
I’m going to force myself to stop right there.
I’ll most likely vote for David. I also like Anton Gunn but it seems like Anton has been running for this office for years and years. Yes, I realize he lost his previous race. But so far it seems Anton just wants to be elected to something.
I also don’t really like the fact that Anton doesn’t seem to mention the fact of his role with the Senator Obama campaign. I don’t mind that he has a role, but he seems to avoid mentioning it at all costs. To me that is a sign of “politics as usual.”