Live blogging: Iowa results start coming in

And Ron Paul starts off with an early, slight lede. With only 15 percent reporting, he has 24 percent to Romney’s 23, with Santorum only a fraction under Romney. Gingrich trails far behind. That’s according to The New York Times at 9:09 p.m.

From now on, let’s go to comments. Let the live blog begin…

28 thoughts on “Live blogging: Iowa results start coming in

  1. Brad

    If the pattern holds — and there’s no reason to think now either that it will or won’t; there’s just no telling — it will all be about who’s in second, third and fourth, since the Paul fluke will be widely ignored. Unless, of course, he does surprisingly well in New Hampshire. But don’t hold your breath, Paulistas…

    Reply
  2. Brad

    Ever been to a caucus meeting? Some South Carolinians have — serious partisans, for the most part.

    I covered a caucus — once. It was a congressional-district-level caucus in Arkansas. It was in 1980.

    Talk about your game-playing. George Bush had won in Iowa. Howard Baker had figured out that he wasn’t going to be the nominee, so might as well ally himself with the one who would be. So his delegates conspired with the Reagan delegates to squeeze out Bush and make it come out Reagan first, Baker second (if I remember correctly; it’s been a lot of years).

    Bush showed up at the motel where the meeting was being held. He was so mad he could hardly see straight. We, the press, all wanted to talk to him, but he tried to do an end-run and get out of the place first.

    Some of us cut through the empty dining room to head him off, broken-field running through the vacant tables and chairs, and we got to the front door ahead of him. So he stopped, and made a petulant comment or two. Hostility rising off of him like smoke.

    I interviewed the head of the Baker delegation periodically through the voting, and he just smirked like the cat who ate the canary and said HE couldn’t help who his delegates chose to vote for; if some of them wanted to go for Reagan, that was their business.

    I had never met that guy before that day. He was Don Sundquist. He was later elected to Congress (he hired one of my best reporters — I was the news editor by then — away from me, blast him). Then, he became governor of Tennessee…

    Reply
  3. Brad

    And whoa, with 24 percent in, Romney and Santorum are virtually tied, with Paul a mere sliver behind them, 23.2 percent, 23.2, 23… Gingrich still way behind.

    I’m going to take a break from the numbers until we get over 50 percent…

    Reply
  4. Brad

    Larry Sabato, having pronounced this even a “muddle” on Twitter, goes on to warn, “Three-way ties are always over-interpreted. Get ready!”

    Reply
  5. Brad

    Now I’m going to read some more of “Black Ocean.” Y’all go ahead and comment if you’d like…

    I never know when to do this live-blogging shtick. Sometimes people are eager to weigh in, and I can hardly keep up with approving the comments. Other times, it’s like “Hello! Is anybody out there?” Tonight is the latter.

    I hear there’s a football game on or something. Earlier, there was a sitcom about guys dressed in drag. Hasn’t that been done to death?

    Back to my book…

    Reply
  6. Jeff Morrell

    Earlier, there was a sitcom about guys dressed in drag. Hasn’t that been done to death?

    That dadblambed commercial about that show has driven me crazy…..and you are right. No wonder why outside of sports, I enjoy Me-TV and Encore Westerns.

    It is hard to focus on Iowa with the circus that it is.

    Reply
  7. Brad

    Tonight, with talk out there about Ron Paul using this strength to run on his own outside the party, Democrats are like, “Run, Ron, Run!”

    Reply
  8. Brad

    52 percent!

    With 52 percent reporting, it’s:
    Santorum: 24.3 percent
    Romney: 23.7
    Paul: 21.6
    Gingrich: 13.3
    Perry: 10.2
    Bachmann: 5.6

    Now you figure out what that means…

    What I think it means is that unless Santorum can build on this and prove it’s not a fluke, Romney has the big Mo as the candidate everyone has to settle for. If you can stand that irony.

    But if Santorum does really well in New Hampshire, well… E.J. Dionne’s speculation this morning about Santorum and SC could turn out to be prophetic…

    Reply
  9. Brad

    59 percent, and it looks like that pattern is holding.

    I’m going to stop now. I’ll keep watching for a few more minutes, though. If anything different happens, or if any of y’all wake up and say something, I might weigh in, too.

    Yawwwnnn….

    Reply
  10. bud

    Romney wins by 8 votes. Eight! Too bad this wasn’t the general election with one state on the line deciding the result. Now that would be exciting.

    Going forward it’s really hard to see what can stop Romney at this point. Some consolidation will emerge around Santorum after Perry and Bachmann bow out. That could give Santorum a shot in SC. But it just doesn’t seem like enough for the long haul. With Paul hanging around for a while longer I suspect he’ll take away more from Santorum than Romney. Gingrich seems like a much longer shot this morning but could do well in SC. The odds look something like this:

    Romney 1-3
    Santorum 5-1
    Paul 6-1
    Gingrich 6-1
    Huntsman 10-1
    Bachmann 20-1
    Perry (appears to have suspended his campaign)

    Reply
  11. martin

    At my house right this minute, the clock says 9:34AM.

    buds entry says 9:37AM and that sweet thing Steven Davis’ says 9:56AM.

    What’s up with your clock?

    Reply
  12. Steven Davis

    Martin – it’s called Daylight Standard Time. The server the blog is housed on didn’t change, it’ll be fixed in about 4-5 months.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *