I’m serious here. Unless one is naked and freezing — or naked and therefore in danger of a ruinous social faux pas — how could there be such a thing as a “wardrobe must-have?”
I speak particularly from the perspective of a man — since that’s who this come-on assumes must have these things — but the same would seem to apply to women as well.
What wardrobe item, nakedness on a cold day aside, is necessary, to the extent that one’s existence is threatened without it? Under certain circumstances, perhaps, a pressure suit or a Kevlar vest or a crash helmet, but why must one have, for instance, chinos — or a light jacket, a button-down shirt, loafers or athletic shoes (those being the items specified in the email)?
I have no idea.
Related Posts
Do sunglasses count?
Apparently your readers do not spend a lot of time worrying about wardrobe “must haves.”
So you’re saying that there is a lack of metrosexuals on this blog? Nobody getting mani-pedi’s, using moisturizers on their face daily, excited when the new Italian loafers come out every year, etc…?
There may be a tiny bit of intermediate ground between disinterest and obsession
Look around, what are the majority of the young males in the area wearing? Flip-flops, shorts, and a baseball cap. The latter may be accessorized with shades.