Category Archives: EcoDevo

Not that there’s anything wrong with that…

Adam Fogle has filed a TPS report to the effect that… well, here’s how it starts:

SCPRT FUNDING PROGRAM TO MARKET SC AS ‘GAY STATE’
    This may come as a surprise to many South Carolinians, but your tax dollars are being used to target gay travelers from across the pond.
    The Palmetto Scoop has learned that the Department of Parks, Recreation and Tourism — a state agency overseen by the Gov. Mark Sanford’s office — is spending an undisclosed amount of its nearly $14 million advertising budget to take part in the “So Gay” campaign, an effort launched in London, England, by the gay marketing agency “Out Now” to lure homosexual tourists to South Carolina and five U.S. cities.

Columbia has been struggling hard to come up with a marketing slogan to attract tourists. Could "So Gay" be it?

And yes, my headline came from a "Seinfeld" episode. If Adam can make allusions to "Office Space," I can do the same with "Seinfeld."

Well, I got two out of three

As some of y’all already noted, I got two of my three wild guesses right on the finalist list for USC president: Harris Pastides, and a woman. (Do I get extra points because there are two women?)

Andy Card* was apparently no one the trustees ever wanted. Apparently, the talk about him was generated by the wishful thinking of politicos — or somebody.

Of course, the fact that wild guesses were in order reflects the failure of USC trustees to conduct an open process that would allow stakeholders (i.e., the people of South Carolina) to vet the candidates before the decision is made.

But that’s par for the course, isn’t it?

Of course, if Pastides is the winner of the contest, we’ll have had plenty of opportunity to assess the new guy. And the impression I’ve formed over the years has been quite good. He’s been at the forefront of the most critical initiatives the university — indeed, all three of the state’s research universities — has been engaged in, and is well-positioned to continue the push.

At this point — thanks to the trustees’ secrecy — going forward with either of the other two candidates will seem like stepping off blindfolded into a void. Maybe they’re great, but we haven’t had the opportunity to decide that.

One worry I have if it is Pastides (and if it isn’t, he sure made the wrong call putting all his eggs in this basket), what will he be able to accomplish that Andrew Sorensen could not? I’ve never been satisfied with the official explanation, that Dr. Sorensen and the board suddenly realized he was about to turn 70, and there’s this multi-year fund-raising push coming up, yadda-yadda… Didn’t he ALWAYS have a future full of fund-raising? What was new?

My worry takes this form? If for some other reason the board had become disenchanted with the charismatic Sorensen, how will a quieter member of the same administration succeed? Or is "low-key" what trustees are looking for?

Who knows? I don’t. I just want the next president to be successful, because so much is riding on this for South Carolina. I think Harris Pastides can do the job, if the string-pullers will let him. As for the two ladies? I have no idea…

* Did I ever mention my almost-connection to Andy Card? I’ve never met him or anything, but he was supposed to be my uncle’s roommate at USC. They had been randomly matched up, but at the last minute my Uncle Woody roomed with someone else. Yes, Andy Card is of my uncle’s generation. I’m that young — haven’t you seen my picture at left? … Actually, Woody is my Mama’s way-younger brother — he’s only six years older than I am.

USC president: They’re doing it again

As you saw in today’s paper, the USC trustees might, if they feel like it, tell us who their three "finalists" for president of the university are. Then they plan to make their final selection Friday.

In other words, they’re presenting us with the next thing to a fait accompli, with virtually no time for the community (and in this case, "community" includes the state of South Carolina) to react and offer input.

As it happens this is precisely what we told them not to do in this editorial on our June 22 editorial page.

Could it be that they ignored us, again? Naaahhhh….

Since we’re all being kept in the dark, here are my predictions of who the three will be. We’ll see how many I get right (probably none, but I have no money bet on this, so who cares?):

  1. Harris Pastides
  2. Andy Card
  3. A Woman. No, I don’t have a name; I’m just saying one of the three will be a woman.

Yeah, I got the first two from today’s story. Of course, they’re the two who’ve been most often mentioned in the past. But the very fact that we all think we have reason to believe those two are finalists probably means that they were long ago eliminated from consideration, just because the trustees want to rub our noses in just how much in the dark we are, and what little regard they have for us and what we think we know…

Energy Party: Mayor Bob says don’t forget hydrogen

My latest Energy Party column has been well received, but a common complaint is that not EVERY plank of the platform was mentioned or elaborated upon. This from Mayor Bob Coble of Columbia:

Brad you should add a plank in your Energy Party Platform calling for research and production of hydrogen energy including hydrogen fuel cells. I know you wrote in your Sunday column that a higher gas tax after 9-11 could have been used to accelerate "…the development of hydrogen, solar, wind, clean coal, methanol-from-coal, electric cars, mass transit…" but alternate energy should be a major part of your platform.

On July 14th the Board of the National Hydrogen Association will meet in Columbia in preparation for their convention in March, which will bring to Columbia the international hydrogen and fuel cell industry’s largest companies.  Becoming part of the hydrogen economy is an important economic strategy for Columbia and South Carolina.  In 2008, we will build the first public hydrogen fueling station in the Southeast.  Millennium Cell, a world leader in hydrogen battery technology, is moving a subsidiary company, Gecko Technologies, to Columbia.  USC has the nation’s only National Science Foundation Industry/University Cooperative Research Center for Fuel Cells.  The Savannah River National Lab and Clemson’s International Center for Automotive Research are centers for hydrogen research.

Every facet of society stands to be impacted by hydrogen generated energy. A major source of global warming could disappear as well as America’s reliance on foreign oil.  Our strategy is to see that Columbia is the site for much of the commercialization of the hydrogen economy. 

Additionally, Innovista, which of course will promote a number of different areas of research, will be Columbia’s greatest opportunity to create jobs and increase our per capita income. According to a recent survey, 90% of City residents support the research campus and these efforts. The Association of University Technology Managers recently ranked USC number 11 out of 114 public universities in the number of start-up businesses created.

Finally, we are trying to connect our citizen to the knowledge economy. Over 8,000 students graduate from Columbia institutions of higher education each year.  The Columbia Talent Magnet project is designed to keep these bright minds in the Columbia region by connecting them to existing community initiatives. Also, the USC Columbia Technology Incubator has assisted 63 companies and created 554 new jobs including 142 minority and female jobs. 

The Energy Party should aggressively promote all alternate forms of energy particularly hydrogen.

Of course, hydrogen has been mentioned in earlier Energy Party documents, such as this original column. An excerpt:

Another is a Manhattan project (or Apollo Project, or insert your favorite 20th century Herculean national initiative name) to develop clean, alternative energy. South Carolina can do hydrogen, Iowa can do bio, and the politicians who will freak out about all this can supply the wind power….

Andy Brack on Queensland

Over the weekend (as in, before my Sunday column appeared), Andy Brack sent me the following e-mail. Andy, by the way, hosts S.C. Statehouse Report:

Brad,

Hope you’re well.

Peter Beattie was over at our house last night for dinner and mentioned that you and he had talked about some of the things that Queensland has done well.

I was in Queensland last year and did a series of columns on what’s happening there compared to here…thought you might be interested:

SC can nurture Queensland relationship better, July 29, 2007

Collaborating with Queensland for economic success, Aug. 5, 2007

South Carolina can learn about life from Queensland, Aug. 12, 2007

South Carolina leaders need to start thinking big, March 7, 2008

Best,

Andy

Why can’t we be smart like our sister?

By BRAD WARTHEN
EDITORIAL PAGE EDITOR
THINK OF South Carolina as a restless schoolboy. He doesn’t test well, but he’s got loads of potential; everybody says so. He’s a well-meaning kid, but has an attention-deficit problem. There he sits, as far to the back of the class as he can get away with. As the teacher drones on about science and stuff, he wonders whether he can get away with spending his lunch money on candy again. Then, just as he’s turned to calculating the number of days left until school is out and he can go to the beach (he’s very good at this sort of math), his reverie is rudely interrupted.
    The teacher stands over him, her eyes just boring into him over the glasses on the end of her nose. She speaks directly to him, demanding to know, “Why can’t you be smart like your sister?”
    The poor kid hears that a lot.
    My own rather feckless, aimless mind (I was born here, you know) has been running along these lines all week, as I’ve been repeatedly reminded of how well our smart sister has applied herself. Not my sister, personally, but South Carolina’s. Her name is Queensland, and she’s our sister state in Australia.
    Her former premier, Peter Beattie, spoke at my Rotary meeting Monday, although I didn’t realize it at the time because I slipped out of the meeting early (I’m telling you, I am that boy). Mr. Beattie is the one who suggested the whole “sister-state” economic development relationship when he was in office back in the ’90s. He got the idea after a visit here in 1996. He had come to study how our state had taken advantage of the Atlanta Olympics, serving as a training site and hosting the women’s marathon trials. He hoped his state could do the same with the Sydney games.
    As things turned out, though, our “sister” would go on to do some things we should emulate. As premier, he pushed a strategy that would lead to Australia’s “Sunshine State” getting a new alias: “The Smart State.”
    During a week when the S.C. Senate Finance Committee was reacting to tough fiscal times by cutting back on the endowed chairs program and letting K-12 funding slide backward, I kept getting my nose rubbed in the smartness of our sister despite my best efforts to miss the point. On Wednesday, someone sent me a copy of remarks Mr. Beattie — who has been lecturing at USC’s Walker
Institute of International & Area Studies recently — had prepared
for a speech this coming Tuesday to the Global Business Forum in Columbia. I skimmed over what he had written…

    Twenty years ago, Queensland was a traditional rocks-and-crops economy where education was not regarded as a priority. But with increasing globalisation, my government knew this was not enough to compete with the new emerging markets of China and India…. We publicly said innovate or stagnate were our choices.
    As a result we developed a strategy called Smart State. This involved a major overhaul of our education and training systems… the cutting edge of developments in biotechnology, energy, information and communications…
    The result has been… Queensland’s lowest unemployment rate in three decades… budget surpluses and a AAA credit rating. Our economic growth has outperformed the nation’s growth for 10 consecutive years and was done on the back of competitive state taxes. Our focus has been long-term and education reform was central.
    Since 1998, the Queensland Government has invested almost $3 billion to boost innovation and R&D infrastructure…

    … but I didn’t have time to read it all just then. Being that unfocused boy, I did find time to write a pointless post on my blog about how “For some reason, Queensland keeps coming up a lot this week for me….” That night, I was attending a lecture by Salman Rushdie, who had been brought here by Janette Turner Hospital, the novelist and USC professor, who as it happens grew up in Queensland.
    So guess who I ran into at the reception that night for Mr. Rushdie? Yep — Peter Beattie. (The coincidences were starting to get as weird and mystical as something out of a novel by, well, Salman Rushdie.)
    Cooperating with the inevitable, I introduced myself, and he told me eagerly about the exciting high-tech opportunities he saw here in South Carolina, what with the endowed chairs and Innovista, and our state’s advantages in the fields of hydrogen power, clean coal technology and biotech.
    Biotech, by the way, has been a big one for Queensland, employing 3,200 people, generating $4 billion a year in revenues, and leading to such concrete advances as Ian Fraser’s new human papillomavirus vaccine, which is now protecting 13 million women worldwide from cervical cancer — just so you know it’s not all pie in the sky.
    When I asked him about some of the less-than-visionary (in my view, not his) decisions being made by S.C. political leaders as we spoke, he insisted that was not his place: “I’m a guest here,” he said in that wonderful Down Under accent. “Queensland is like South Carolina. Manners are important.”
    He spoke instead about the opportunities we had in common, and about the fact that places such as Queensland and South Carolina “have to innovate or be left behind.”
    South Carolina, so used to lagging behind the other kids, truly does possess the potential to be a “smart state” like our sister. But too many easily distracted boys over at the State House keep staring out the classroom window…

The mysterious Queensland connection

For some reason, Queensland keeps coming up a lot this week for me.

  • First, some visitors from there were introduced at my Rotary meeting Monday afternoon (at which I had to do the Health and Happiness presentation). Queensland is South Carolina’s official Australian sister state for economic development purposes, a fact that comes up frequently at Rotary, it seems.
  • Monday night, I sat in on Janette Turner Hospital‘s lecture on Salman Rushdie’s Midnight’s Children, then I was the moderator of a panel discussion that followed about religion and culture and politics and how they come together in the whole Rushdie fatwa thing. Why Janette and Gordon Smith asked me, I’m still not clear. Anyway, Janette grew up in Queensland, and went to university there.
  • Then today, Samuel Tenenbaum, in keeping with his never-ending battle to save the endowed chairs program (a battle that gets tougher every day), sent me an article by Peter Beattie, the former premier of Queensland, who is now teaching at USC Moore School of Business.

Somehow, this series of coincidences seem almost like the sort of mystical stuff you’d find in a Rushdie novel (either that, or like something from "I Huckabees," depending on how high- or lowbrow your cultural associations may be). Which reminds me… tonight I’m going to Mr. Rushdie’s lecture at USC, and might meet him afterward at a reception. If so, I’ll tell you about it.

Anyway, the article Samuel sent me was about how "Queensland took the view that brain power and the encouragement of innovation are our future," and the resulting "Smart State" program took Queensland from a "traditional rocks and crops economy" to the point that it attracted some of the most sophisticated research facilities in the world, and now has about 90 knowledge-economy firms employing over 1,900 people. The whole "Smart State" thing has really caught on there, leading observers around the world to ask South Carolinians, "Why can’t you be smart like your sister?" OK, I made that last part up, but it’s not an unfair representation of how we are received, which is why folks like Samuel (and I) believe we need to maintain our commitment to endowed chairs.

Samuel wants me to consider the piece for op-ed, and perhaps I shall. If not, I’ll post it here.

What is the useful role of CHE?

Waltersgarrison

A
s foreshadowed in a previous post, we met this afternoon with Garrison Walters, the new (new to us, anyway) head of the state Commission on Higher Education.

Once upon a time, that post was filled by Fred Sheheen — Vincent’s Daddy, for those keeping up with political genealogy — who had an active, aggressive notion of the role the CHE should play in marshaling this poor state’s limited higher education resources to greatest effect. The powers that be, such as those who revere the prerogatives of the godlike boards of trustees of the respective institutions, did not like his style. They moved not only to get rid of him, but to restructure the CHE to make it kinder, gentler and less likely to say "nay" to anything they wished to do — or to have any authority even if it did say so.

Since then, the organization has been a lot more studious and polite — content with a "coordinating" rather than "governing" role. Mr. Walters is aware that our board has long favored a Board of Regents that would treat our collection of public, post-secondary institutions as a system rather than islands. He maintains, as do many who cast doubt on our restructuring fervor (say, the Senate on doing away with the "long ballot," or defenders of the council-manager system in Columbia), that some states with such boards do well, and others do not, while some states without overall governance do fine (he cites Michigan, Illinois and Texas).

My position, as always, is that given a choice between a structure intended to facilitate efficiency and accountability on the one hand, and a structure that one can succeed in those regards in spite of, I prefer the former.

As previously noted, of course, we temporarily have a condition in which our three research institutions, motivated in part by such inducements as the endowed chairs, are pulling at their oars as though they understand that we’re all in the same boat. Mr. Walters made note of that. Our position is to applaud our current state, but to worry about what happens when the current individuals in leadership move on, as Andrew Sorensen is about to do. Below that level cooperation and coordination is less evident, although there are encouraging exceptions to that trend.

Anyway, Mr. Walters held out hope that once a study committee finishes its work in September, we might see a new focus and purpose toward focusing our higher ed efforts. Let’s hope he’s right. In the meantime, I provide a video clip in which I ask our guest what he thinks it will take for South Carolina to get where it needs to go, and what CHE’s role is in that…

South Carolina just got a little smarter

Morad

This morning I had the honor of meeting Martin Morad, who plans "to develop the world’s first pacemaker made from living tissue," and to do it right here in South Carolina. He’s the latest extraordinary individual that the endowed chairs program has brought here. (That’s him with Larry Wilson and Harris Pastides above. I think those are Ray Greenberg’s arms folded at left; I don’t know the lady in the background.)

There are a lot of things I could say about this guy, and I hope to come back here and say them later (right now, I’m stealing time from other things that need doing today in order to write this — as usual). For now, read the story that was on today’s front page.

I’ll just mention one thing that may seem small to you, but which marks a huge step in my mind…

If there is one thing that holds South Carolina back economically, politically, socially and in every other way more than anything else, it’s fragmentation. Our government is completely dysfunctional thanks to the fragmentation of authority and accountability in the executive branch. On the local level, you see fractals reflecting the same pattern — Columbia as an economic entity can’t get its act together because it’s split into about a dozen municipalities, two counties, seven school districts, various special purpose districts, etc. Even when you distill it down to the tiny political entity that is technically Columbia, political power is fragmented across a seven-member council with no one, elected individual in a position to be responsible for the big picture.

In the realm of higher education, fragmentation has taken us into some amazingly stupid realms in our recent history. First, there is the fact that each of our colleges and semi-colleges is a political entity unto itself, answerable to no one but each institution’s respective board of trustees, each member of which is elected by the 170 members of the General Assembly. This has led to such things as the battle over supercomputers in the late 80s, right after I came back to SC to work at this newspaper — if USC was going to get a supercomputer, then the political "logic" of this state was what Clemson had to have one, too.

We have the charade of a coordinating body — the Commission on Higher Education — which is, by legislative decree, toothless. (Coincidentally, the new head of the CHE is coming to meet the editorial board this afternoon, which puts this even more immediately in mind.) But there is nothing like, say, a board of regents with real power to assign missions, coordinate and focus resources and avoid duplication.

In the last few years, we have been fortunate in that the three presidents of our research institutions — Andrew Sorensen, Ray Greenberg and James Barker — have formed an alliance to work together on a variety of fronts to accomplish some of the things that a unified, rational system of public higher education was accomplished. One of the greatest factors encouraging this relationship to flourish — giving it an undeniable economic impetus — is the endowed chairs program.

Anyway, here’s the thing about Dr. Morad that is in its way as remarkable for South Carolina as, say, developing a living pacemaker: He is the first faculty member in the history of the state to be simultaneously hired by all three research universities at once. (Why? Because it took all three institutions to come up with the talent he needs to make his project happen — which suggests that maybe we should start referring to the three, and governing them, as one institution; put them together, and you’ve got something impressive.) Therefore he embodies the combination of our resources to achieve great things that our petty divisions have kept us from accomplishing in the past. He is the New South Carolinian, the Adam in our new-tech Garden of Eden.

I’ll stop with the metaphors now. Suffice it to say, his arrival in this, his new home, is a big deal for South Carolina.

Contact report: Hugh Leatherman

One thing I need to do is catch up on some recent meetings I haven’t let y’all know about, before I get too far behind. I’ll mention this chance encounter from this morning now:

I ran into Sen. Hugh Leatherman this morning at breakfast and sat with him for awhile to kick over a number of topics — national and state politics, what’s happening in Florence, etc.

Two things stand out in my mind:

  1. We talked about endowed chairs. Sen. Leatherman is high on the program, but isn’t convinced that the cap has to be raised. Mind you, he’s certainly not persuaded by any of the governor’s objections, which seem to him off-base. The governor chops at trees, but has never bought into the forest (although he IS into preservation of wilderness, so maybe that’s a bad metaphor). But the Senate Finance Chairman sees a way to make sure future chairs are funded without lifting the cap. He briefly explained it, but I confess I didn’t fully understand it, and didn’t want to detain him all morning trying to. It’s a good topic for further inquiry.
  2. I was reminded at various points in the conversation, as I am so often in speaking with the General Assembly’s Republican leadership, about how frustrated they are trying to deal with the governor day-to-day. Conversations such as this one flesh out the substance of such stories as this one in The Post and Courier today, about the governor’s efforts to stack the Legislature in his image. To serious, responsible lawmakers, having one Mark Sanford is enough of a burden; they don’t need any clones. Note this quote from the Charleston story: "If someone ran against Senator Leatherman, I’d probably support them." Who said that? Mark Sanford. So we’re not just talking paranoia here.

Another county heard from on endowed chairs

Tenenbaumsamuel

Samuel Tenenbaum (pictured above, back when he was running Columbia’s Katrina relief effort) hipped me to this editorial from over in Anderson this morning. An excerpt:

    We’re puzzled by Gov. Mark Sanford’s estimation of the effectiveness of endowed chairs for research, especially considering his usually forward-thinking positions on technology and economic development.
    Last week, Mr. Sanford encouraged House lawmakers to reconsider a proposal that removes the cap on lottery proceeds for the Centers of Economic Excellence program…..
    Before the lottery became official in South Carolina, we questioned whether endowed chairs were the best use of funds. But it’s clear that transforming our state into one that is in the forefront of research into health care, automotives and other economic development opportunities could not have gotten this far without the financial boost from lottery proceeds.
    For once, South Carolina is thinking not just about what next year might bring but what could develop in five years or 10 years or even 20 years in the future as a result of research efforts right here at home.

Frankly, I’m puzzled as to  why the Anderson paper is puzzled. Maybe it’s because it labors under the mistaken impression that Mr. Sanford "usually" manifests "forward-thinking positions on technology and economic development." Where they got that, I don’t know. If he’s done that, I must have been looking somewhere else at the time. His pattern ranges from neutral to hostile when it comes to ecodevo investments. If you’ll recall, his first big move in that arena came in his first month in office, when he put the brakes on Clemson’s I-CAR program. Soon after being hit by a tsunami of outrage from Upstate leaders, he let the project go ahead. Here’s what the chair of our endowed chairs board had to say Sunday about what that project has produced:

For instance, the endowed chairs program is a central component of the Clemson International Center for Automotive Research. The recruiting of three world-renowned experts in automotive engineering has already attracted major investment from companies such as BMW, Timken, Sun Microsystems and Michelin, and — all told more than $220 million in private investment and 500 jobs in the Upstate with an average salary of $75,000.

Also, here’s what BMW had to say recently about that partnership.

Again, as I said in my column Sunday, our governor doesn’t believe, deep down, in public investment in building our economy, whether we’re talking K-12 public schools or endowed chairs. He believes all that is needed for a robust economy is the right "soil conditions," which to him largely means reduced income taxes.

Finally, why did Samuel,  the head of the Energy Party’s think tank, bring this to my attention? Because Samuel is the father of endowed chairs. He came up with the idea of spending lottery funds this way, he fought to convince Gov. Jim Hodges to go along with it, and has fought ever since against short-sighted efforts in the Legislature to kill or curtail the program and spend the money on something more immediately politically appealing. Samuel also served on the endowed chairs board from its inception until Mark Sanford replaced him last year.

But while he may be a cheerleader without portfolio, he cheers just as loudly as ever, and for good reason. The endowed chairs program, his baby, offers a lot to cheer about — and will continue to do so, if it survives the likes of Mark Sanford.

Sanford fails to derail progress — this time

By BRAD WARTHEN
Editorial Page Editor
LATE WEDNESDAY, I thought I had come up with an excuse to say something encouraging about Gov. Mark Sanford.
    Such opportunities come so seldom that I didn’t want this idea to get away from me. I sent a note to my colleagues to enlist their help in remembering: “Should we do some kind of attaboy on the governor using his bully pulpit for this good cause (as opposed to some of the others he is wont to push)?” I was referring to his efforts to jawbone the Legislature into meaningful reform of our DUI law.
    Moments later, I read the governor’s guest column on our op-ed page about a flat tax, which was his latest attempt to slip through an income tax cut, which at times seems to be the only thing he cares about doing as governor. This chased thoughts of praise from my mind.
    For the gazillionth time, he cited Tom Friedman in a way that would likely mortify the columnist and author. His “argument,” if you want to call it that: Since The World Is Flat, folks on the other side of the world are going to get ahead of us if we take a couple of hours to pull together our receipts and file a tax return. Really. “Rooting around shoeboxes of receipts” once a year was going to do us in. (And never mind the fact that most paperwork is done on the federal return, with the state return piggybacking on that.)
    Then, he argued that his plan for cutting the income tax (which was his point, not avoiding the onerous filing) was necessary to offset a proposed cigarette tax increase. The alternative would be “to grow government,” which is how he describes using revenue to get a three-to-one federal match to provide health care for some of our uninsured citizens.
    Here in the real world, folks want to raise our lowest-in-the-nation cigarette tax to price the coffin nails beyond the means of teenagers. Everybody who has in any way participated in conversations at the State House about the issue over the last several years knows this. Yet the governor of our state, who seems only to have conversations with himself, can ask this about raising that tax: “(W)hat for, more government or a lower-tax option?” In his narrowly limited version of reality, those are the only considerations.
    But enough about that essay from an alternative dimension. What I read on the front page the next morning drove it from my mind: “Sanford: ‘Endowed chairs’ a failure.” It was about his latest attack on one of the few really smart, strategic moves this state has made in the past decade.
    It’s the one good thing to come out of Gov. Jim Hodges’ execrable state lottery. (I used to struggle to come up with good things to say about him, too, but this was one such thing.) The scholarships? We were doing that without the lottery, and would have expanded them without the lottery except Gov. Hodges vetoed that bill (because he wanted a lottery).
    But a small chunk of the new “chump tax” was set aside to provide seed money to attract some of the best and brightest minds to South Carolina, and put them to work building our economy. Gov. Sanford has never liked this idea, because he doesn’t like the state to invest in the future in any appreciable way apart from land conservation (which is a fine idea, but hardly a shot in the arm to the economy). He believes we don’t need to invest more in education, or research, or even our Department of Commerce, which he takes such pride in having trimmed. His entire “economic development” plan is to cut the income tax. This attracts folks who have already made their pile and are looking for a tax haven in which to hide it, and makes him a hero to the only political entity in the nation that sees him as a hot property: the Club for Growth, whose president showed just how out of touch that group is with even the Republican portion of the electorate by suggesting John McCain pick Mr. Sanford as his running mate.
    The thing that made this outburst from the governor particularly galling is that on Wednesday, I had met Jay Moskowitz, the new head of Health Sciences South Carolina — a consortium of universities and hospitals teaming together to make our state healthier, both physically and economically.
    Dr. Moskowitz is the former deputy director of the National Institutes of Health, and most recently held a stack of impressive titles at Penn State, including “chief scientific officer.” He made it clear that he would not be here if not for the endowed chairs program. Nor would others. He spoke of the top people he’s recruited in his few months here, who have in turn recruited others, an example of the “cascade of people that are going to be recruited with each of these chairs.”
    These folks aren’t just coming to buy a few T-shirts at the beach and leave. They’re here to make their home, and to build their new home into the kind of place that will attract other creative minds. The endowed chairs program is the principal factor that convinces them to pull up stakes and make the effort. “I had a wonderful job in Pennsylvania,” said Dr. Moskowitz, and he wouldn’t have left it without believing that South Carolina was committed to moving forward on a broad research front.
    He doesn’t say it this way, but it’s obvious he wouldn’t have come if he had thought Mark Sanford’s “leave it alone” approach was typical of our state’s leadership.
    Fortunately, it is not. The S.C. House, led by Speaker Bobby Harrell, rose up in response to the governor’s naysaying and voted unanimously to extend the endowed chairs program.
    This is a moment of high irony for me. For 17 years I’ve pushed to give more power to South Carolina’s governor because our state so badly needed visionary leadership, and I thought there was little reason to expect it would come from our Legislature.
    But on Thursday, it did. And if the Senate has the wisdom to follow suit, your children and my grandchildren will have reason to be grateful.

Can you read this?

posting via Treo from Rotary

Our speaker today is Debbie Yoho of the Greater Columbia Literacy Council, talking about the problem of adult illiteracy in South Carolina.

Her Most Alarming Fact sums up why we should care: 52 percent of adults in South Carolina can’t read beyond an elementary school basis. It’s actually worse than that sounds … Debbie explains that what that means is that a majority of adults in our state can’t anything beyond 300 to 500 simple word they recognize by sight. I don’t know about you, but I’m guessing I was at that point sometime during the first grade.

Explains a lot, huh?

Tom’s trip to China

Remember this post? Remember that part of Tom Davis’ explanation for mistakenly not mentioning government restructuring in the fund-raising letter for ReformSC was that he was busy getting ready to go to China?

Well, I was going to link from that statement to some info about the China trip — but I couldn’t find any. Thinking that was pretty weird, I wrote to Tom,

Tom, this is
going to seem like a real whiplash-producing digression, but I cannot find a
word having been written anywhere about your trip to China. Was that a big
missed story? Was it intentionally kept quiet?
Maybe it
would be a good topic for an op-ed or something, if you were so inclined. How
did it go?

Here’s what he sent me about it, with the press release that I couldn’t find earlier appended:

Brad,
The meeting was great and would love to meet sometime to
tell you about it.  The main object was
to have

China


increase capital investment and trade in S.C. Currently, direct investment by

China

in our
state is $230 Million (with 1,600 jobs).

 

China


is a growing target of

South
Carolina

and other states.

China

realizes
they must follow the pattern the Japanese did in the 1970’s by increasing
imports from the

United
States

and locating manufacturing plants here.

 

While we hear about the imports into the

U.S.

from

China

regularly
in the media, we rarely hear about the export opportunities.

South Carolina

companies are
taking advantage of this growing market and our role is to help smaller and
medium-sized companies make export sales there. In only five years time,

China

as an S.C.
export market moved from number eleven in rank, to number 4 in 2006. In 2006,
exports from S.C. to

China

rose 12.5%
to more than $869 million dollars.

 

Another goal of the recent trip was to promote a China
Trade and

Investment


Park

being located in S.C.  The Chinese central government, through its
Ministry of Commerce, is considering setting up several Chinese
government-approved/designated Chinese Industrial Parks in several overseas
countries.  Letters and proposals
supporting this were sent by Commerce officials and the governor strongly
followed up on this with personal meetings with Chinese officials. 

 

We also wanted to promote Chinese Research Facilities
& Research Collaboration with SC Universities, particularly in the
manufacturing and medical areas.  In
manufacturing, one of the most likely collaborations is in relation to Haier’s
planned R&D facility in

South
Carolina

. Collaboration is also sought between

China

and

South Carolina

’s three leading
research institutions primarily in the areas of cancer research and gene
therapy. The Medical University of South Carolina is a rapidly growing research
environment. Extramural research support has consistently increased over the
past 10 years, topping $170 million last fiscal year.

 

Additionally, The South Carolina Biotechnology
Incubation Program is part of the State’s efforts to build the infrastructure
necessary to increase

South
Carolina

‘s knowledge economy and to participate in
growth of the nation’s life science industry. The J.C. Self Research Institute
of Human Genetics, a division of the

Greenwood


Genetic


Center

, serves as the academic anchor
for the Incubation Program with the collaboration of the State’s three research
universities:

Clemson


University

, the Medical University of
South Carolina, and the

University

of

South
Carolina

.

 

Finally, both

China

and

South Carolina

are challenged with
creating and retaining jobs and employment, as well as providing adequate
education and medical care in rural regions.

South
Carolina

proposes the creation of a formal collaboration
on strategies to enhance development on this challenging issue.

Clemson


University

is already in discussion
with

Tsinghua


University

to establish a training
program for Chinese government officials from the Chinese rural
areas.

 

As far as our office goes, no, this was not intentionally
kept quiet, but you are right in that it did not get a lot of press. The release
from our office on the trip is reprinted below. There were numerous other pitches for stories, but none caught on with
the press.

 

Tom
 
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Contact: Joel Sawyer

jsawyer@gov.sc.gov 

 
Gov. Sanford to Lead State Delegation to World Economic Forum
 
GOVERNOR TO LEAD GROUP OF BUSINESS LEADERS,
LEGISLATORS TO WORLD FORUM IN DALIAN, CHINA
 
Columbia, S.C. – September 4, 2007 – Gov. Mark Sanford will
today lead a delegation of South Carolina business leaders and legislators to
Dalian, China for the World Economic Forum’s inaugural "New Champions" meeting.
    The Dalian conference presents a unique opportunity for the
state, given that Gov. Sanford was the only U.S. governor invited to attend. The
governor will be joined by a state delegation consisting of Marty Brown,
President of Colite International; Mike Johnson, President of Cox Industries;
Forester Adams, President of Joseph Walker & Co; Derick Close, President and
CEO of Creative Products Group for Springs Industries; Guerry Green, President
Screen Tight; and O.L. Thompson, President of O.L. Thompson Construction and
Chairman of Santee Cooper. Rep. Mick Mulvaney, Rep. Nikki Haley, and Sen. Greg
Ryberg are also part of the delegation as representatives of the S.C. General
Assembly.
     "I think attending this conference is a real compliment to
some of the people who’ve worked hard on behalf of economic development over the
years in this state," Gov. Sanford said. "In the global competition for jobs and
investment, South Carolina – like these private sector companies – has both some
real challenges and opportunities in what lies ahead in today’s world. We
believe this trip will result in some real dividends for our state down the
road, both as we learn more about how to compete in this new world and in
building relationships with global business leaders."
     The World Economic Forum is an independent international
organization, best known for its Davos meeting, which is held each March in
Davos, Switzerland. The attendees are the CEO’s of the world’s top 1200
companies. With this meeting, the WEF for the first time is engaging the next
tier of businesses – the New Champions/Global Growth Companies – that have
demonstrated a clear potential to become leaders in the global economy. There
will be 1,500 attendees from 80 countries, representing business, academia and
world leaders. The typical company represented has revenues between $100 million
and $5 billion.
    For more information about the World Economic Forum and the
Dalian Conference, log on to http://www.weforum.org.
 
                        -###-

His-a culpa

Tom1

Just received this mea culpa from Tom Davis, regarding the infamous fund-raising letter for ReformSC:

It was a big mistake…
… for me not to have included a reference to restructuring in that email piece
I sent out a few weeks ago for Reform SC.  Not sure what else to say.  I made a
mistake.

This reminds me of something Tom had said to me about this before, and which Chad Walldorf mentioned again at lunch yesterday (the post about which was probably the impetus for Tom’s e-mail): Tom wrote that letter in a huge hurry during preparations to go on an ecodevo trip to China. Make of that what you will.

Whatever my suspicions of the governor, his anti-government fraternity brothers, and such, I remain convinced that Tom means well. But no matter how sincere he and Chad are, if the money behind ReformSC is about less government, without regard to better government, it will bear watching.

Tom2

Anyone for a bigger, badder ‘Green’ Diamond?

Attention, Austin Powers: Dr. Evil has assumed control of the beach development conglomerate Burroughs & Chapin, and he plans to use it to rule the world! Which means B&C hired a new top guy who wants to do what they’ve always wanted to do.

OK, maybe I’m exaggerating a tad. Actually, I’ve never been one of the reflexive, anti-Green Diamond, B&C haters. I had serious doubts about the floodplain project, but did not consider the company to be Eee-ville (like the Fru-its of the De-ville) for proposing such a plan.

But I sort of soured on them when they carried out their diabolical plan to tear down the Pavilion. Really,Drevil
think about it — for those of us who grew up going to the Grand Strand in the summer, is that not like some sort of Bond-villain plot? I mean, it’s not the Golden Mosque, but can’t you just see a guy with a shaved head (like the one in the picture) holding his pinky to his mouth and delighting in saying, I will blow up your seaside Sanctum Sanctorum unless you send me … one hundred billion dollars!

Well, the actual name of the guy in the picture is Jim Rosenberg, which is why I restrained myself from headlining this post, "Lebensraum." He’s the newly unveiled head of Burroughs & Chapin, and down here at the beach, that is major news. Those of us in the rest of the state might want to pay attention, too, since the new guy wants to grow the company. Yeah, I know, all new CEOs say they want to grow the business, even the ones hired to tear it down and sell off the pieces. But when Burroughs & Chapin says it, believe it:

"If you think the last 14 years was high growth, fasten your seat belt," Rosenberg told the crowd.

The headline in the story that led the Sun News this morning was "New president pledges growth." Here in Horry County, you don’t even have to ask, "the president of what?" I was particularly touched by this passage:

One of the first things he did when arriving on the Grand Strand was visit the former site of The Myrtle Beach Pavilion Amusement Park. But he said it’s too soon to determine what will happen there or at the empty 60-acre site that used to be Myrtle Square Mall.

I wondered whether he laid a wreath while there. If so, the story doesn’t mention it. But at least he paid his respects.

Sure, it’s easy to be nostalgic about something you don’t have to deal with, and I recall being told by the former editor of The Sun News that the Pavilion area had become seriously blighted, a magnet for drugs and crime, etc. But I guess my image of the place will never go much beyond the one in the movie. And now that it’s gone, it sort of reinforces that — even though that image came from before my own time, and own experiences.

Oh, well — gotta pack the car and head back to Cola town.

Opening shots of Campaign 2010

Last week, House Speaker Bobby Harrell spoke to the Greenville Urban League and sounded once again his theme that under Gov. Mark Sanford, South Carolina’s economy is a mess:

    State Speaker of the House Bobby Harrell said Thursday night that when the Urban League of the Upstate focuses on "empowering communities and changing" lives, it is doing what every South Carolinian should do for "the third-worse economy in the country."
    …Harrell said education is critical, but it is "a subset of the economy." He stressed the importance of improving education, especially test scores, statewide.
    He said President Clinton had it right when he ran with the theme: "It’s the economy, stupid."
    "I may be a Republican and he a Democrat, but he got that right," Harrell said.
    "Our duty is to raise the standard of living for the people who are living here."

Back before the 2006 gubernatorial election, the speaker was going around the state saying that Mr. Sanford’s Commerce Department was falling down on the job. He stressed that he wasn’t seeking the governor’s job, and he wasn’t — then. But in 2010, there will be no Republican incumbent.

The Calculator Showdown

I just received this official release related to my previous post. Sounds like a VERY organized "debate." Or perhaps a well-orchestrated ambush. Depends on your perspective, I suppose. Anyway, it’s unusual:


AGENDA

Informational
Meeting of the Board of Economic Advisors Called by the
Chairman

AGREED MEETING
BETWEEN

 

Thomas Ravenel,
Candidate for South Carolina Treasurer and

John S. Rainey,
Chairman of the Board of Economic Advisors

August 24,
2006

10:00 am 

Governor’s
Conference Room

Wade Hampton
Building

I. Call to Order    Chairman Rainey

II. Welcome and Recognitions   Chairman Rainey

III.  Presentation of data that supports a
$27 billion combined unfunded liability of the South Carolina Retirement System
and the state.

     Thomas Ravenel 

 

IV.  Presentation of data that supports
contention that “…in just the last three years, the state’s investment plan has
underperformed the median return of the other states by 70%!”           Thomas Ravenel

V. Definition of “mediocrity” in the
context of a number or range of numbers with respect to investment returns,
specifically as related to the investment plans of “other states” or “large
public pension funds”, as appropriate.

   

Thomas
Ravenel

VI. Source for the proposition that “…the
greatest economic expansion in the history of mankind…” took place between 1980
and 1999. 

     Thomas Ravenel

VII. Review of the performance of Richard
Eckstrom in his management of the South Carolina Retirement System’s and the
state’s funds, by illustration with data, during his term as Treasurer of South
Carolina (1995-1999) relative to that of Grady Patterson, as Treasurer, during
the period 1980 – 1994.     

Thomas
Ravenel

VIII.  Presentation of basis for assertion
that Mr. Patterson’s “…financial strategies haven’t changed since the 1960’s,
resulting in South Carolina once again lagging behind the other 49
states”.

      Thomas Ravenel

IX.  Presentation of basis for assertion
that Grady Patterson, during his tenure as Treasurer, has painted “…a rosy, but
misleading, picture for other state officials and the taxpayers”.

     Thomas Ravenel

X. Closing Comments

     Thomas Ravenel

XI. Closing Comments    Chairman Rainey

XII. Adjournment    Chairman Rainey

Agenda Items III through
IX are issues raised by Mr. Ravenel either in his letter to Chairman Rainey of
August 7, 2006 or in an article in The
Greenville News
of August 15, 2006.

Questions and comments
will be entertained following each agenda item from those present, including
press representatives.

You can’t tell the players WITH a program

When I read this story in this morning’s paper, my first day back after three busy days out of state, I thought, "What in the world has been going on while I was out? And what does it all mean?"

Some would say it’s about the dispute over whether the unfunded liability on the state pension system is $27 billion or $18 billion. Right. Like ETV would be interested in airing that. Next, we’d have a stirring face-off between a house painter and a chemical engineer from Clemson debating how fast paint dries.

No, what’s interesting about this is how beautifully it illustrates one of my favorite points. In fact, it goes beyond showing how meaningless political parties are; it even crosses and confuses and erases the lines between different factions of the party.

Here are a few of the things that occur to me when I read this:

  • Republican Thomas Ravenel’s opponent in the Treasurer’s race is incumbent Grady Patterson, a Democrat who disagrees as often as possible with Republican Gov. Mark Sanford on the Budget and Control Board.
  • One of the points Mr. Ravenel made in support of his candidacy during the primary season was that the governor needed an ally, not an automatic opponent, in that positions. Beyond that, he agrees with the governor that the Budget and Control Board, which gives lesser statewide elected officials and members of the General Assembly equal say to the governor’s over executive functions of government, should not exist. They’re both right on that one, by the way.
  • John Rainey is a traditional, conservative, country-club-type Republican with a strong sense of noblesse oblige — hardly one to be taking up the cudgels for Mr. Patterson.
  • Mr. Rainey is widely credited with having persuaded Mr. Sanford to run for governor four years ago.
  • Mark Sanford is closer to Mr. Ravenel in terms of political philosophy in some ways than either is to most state Republicans. Mr. Sanford is one of those congressional class of ’94 types who thought shutting down the government was a fine idea — which he demonstrated again this year by vetoing the entire state budget. Once could see Mr. Ravenel doing much the same sort of thing — if he had ever served in elective office.
  • A glimmer of meaning arises when you see that Mr. Sanford, Sen. Lindsey Graham and Sen. John McCain are allies, and that Mr. Ravenel’s entire purpose in running for Treasurer is to position himself to try to take down Sen. Graham in two years. But why are Sanford and Graham such allies? The whole reason the extremists that Mr. Ravenel represents want to take out Graham is that he is too rational and bipartisan. The same people despise Sen. McCain for the same reason. The Ravenel folks value their ideology over party loyalty. And when you get down to it, so does Mark Sanford (just ask a legislator).

Well, that’s enough to chew on for now. This thing has more aspects than a cat has hair.

Must have been GOOD barbecue

Last Saturday night, I dropped by a shindig Joe Taylor was hosting at the State Fairgrounds. He was serving vinegar-and-pepper barbecue from Hemingway, and Frogmore Stew. At this event, I saw John Courson, Bob McAlister, Samuel Tenenbaum, Andre Bauer, Bob Coble, Tameika Isaac Devine, Patton Adams and…

Mark Sanford. The governor, who isn’t famous for showing up and staying any length of time at evening social events, stuck around for at least as long as I was there. Basically, I had to split once the band cranked up and it was impossible to carry on a normal conversation with anybody.

Next thing you know, Joe Taylor is secretary of commerce.

The governor must have really liked that barbecue.