How about doing something GOOD that’s ‘unprecedented?’ For a change…

That would be nice. That would be a wonderful change from what we’ve seen ever since 2016, both nationally and here at home.

I’ve never seen anything like this happen in South Carolina. I saw it happen on the national level, though. Once. And once was enough. That was when Mitch McConnell violated his responsibility as leader of the U.S. Senate by refusing to let Merrick Garland’s Supreme Court nomination even be considered in committee, much less come up for a vote.

That’s not exactly what happened here, but in a way, what the Legislature did yesterday was worse, just on a smaller scale. I say that because James Smith did get considered. Not only was he considered, but he was duly found qualified by the screening panel. (How could the panel have possibly reached any other conclusion?)

The only other candidate found qualified dropped out back in January. And yet this judgeship somehow didn’t come up for a vote until we were past the middle of April. And when it came up, lawmakers did the “unprecedented” thing: They refused to vote, and sent it back to the screening panel to try again. Here’s the AP story:

I’m thinking the AP version is more likely to be accessible to all. But here’s the P&C story that the image above refers to, the one with “unprecedented” in the hed.

That story had this passage in it:

State Rep. Micah Caskey, a West Columbia Republican who is chairman of the judicial vetting panel, voted to find Smith qualified on the panel but voted to spike his election during the joint assembly. He said that the role of the vetting panel is to check a candidate’s qualifications while the Legislature can consider a broader set of factors.

“More information was revealed with respect to various positions and statements he’s taken in the past,” Caskey said of the opposition to Smith, who was in attendance for the vote…

As y’all know, Micah is my representative. I supported him for that seat rather than run myself. And I have continued to support him. I’m meeting with him tomorrow. I’ll let you know if he has a good explanation for yesterday, or if anything else newsworthy is said.

What follows is aimed not only at him, but at everyone who participated in this sorry business.

But the only new “information” I have read about would be this:

Anti-abortion groups had pressured Republicans to reject Smith, who supported abortion rights during his political career….

In other words, something completely irrelevant. As I mentioned in my last post, I have utter contempt for people who judge others based on a single issue, that one or any other. Especially when, as in the immediate case, it has pretty much nothing to do with the matter at hand. (That was different in the Garland case, since SCOTUS had made abortion its business back in 1973. But what happened to Garland was still inexcusable, and will blacken Mitch McConnell’s name forever, especially since he remains proud of it.)

This is the kind of behavior you see from people who don’t think about abortion either way, not on any level that matters. They just use it as a litmus test to determine which “side” someone is on (in their feeble minds) so they can know whether to love or hate that person absolutely. Which is sickening. And people on both sides do it to some extent. That’s what Dick Harpootlian is counting on in his contest against Russell Ott.

Some other points:

  • Making all of this even more contemptible is the fact that they could have simply voted James up or down. That’s what honorable people — or people who don’t want to waste everyone’s time — would do in this situation. But they didn’t. Presumably, the cowards must not have thought they had the votes. They figured it was easier just to cop out, and throw it back to Micah’s screening committee.
  • Here’s where the alter cocker talks about how things were “in the old days,” but I assure you what I say is true. This would never have happened (and to my knowledge never did happen) before very, very recently. For instance, it wouldn’t have happened at any point during the 20 years James was in the House himself. People in both parties respected him too much. Of course, some of those people who would never have done this before did it yesterday. That’s because they’re now different people. The whole country is different.
  • Following up on that previous bullet, we now live in a country in which Republican lawmakers will do any contemptible thing — even abandon Ukraine to the bloodthirsty predations of Vladimir Putin — to pacify the loudest, most ourrageous lunatics in their ranks, people they would have laughed at a few years ago. That’s what we have sunk to.

I had coffee with James downtown this morning, keeping an appointment we set several days ago. He, like me, is very disappointed. Personally, I had looked forward to saying “your honor” when I saw him. For his part, I’m sure it’s painful to be treated this way by an insitution in which he served so honorably and respectably for two decades.

But James will be fine. Folks, in case you wonder, he didn’t need this job. He’s a partner in one of the biggest, most successful law firms in the state. Beyond that, he also enjoys serving on the PatriotPoint Development Authority Board. His grandfather served on USS Laffey, one of the ships in that museum, in World War II. He was on his way down there after our meeting this morning.

He ran for that judgeship because it was another chance to serve. James likes to serve his country and his state, perhaps more than anyone else I know. He has definitely proved his devotion to country. The P&C story noted that he is “a decorated combat veteran from the Afghanistan War.” That ain’t the half of it. As I wrote in 2006:

Rep. James Smith of Columbia was a JAG officer in the National Guard with the rank of captain, but he didn’t think that was doing enough. So a couple of years back, he started agitating for a transfer to the infantry. His entreaties were rebuffed. He bucked it up to Washington before someone told him fine, you can do that — as long as you give up your commission and start over as an enlisted man…

So that’s what he did. He went through basic training with kids half his age, and after OCS (that is, the Guard version of OCS) and advanced infantry combat training, went to Afghanistan and distinguished himself in combat. He was named to the Palmetto Military Academy Hall of Fame for that. You know why?

Because it was unprecedented.

22 thoughts on “How about doing something GOOD that’s ‘unprecedented?’ For a change…

  1. Brad Warthen Post author

    Just to let you know that I can find things to smile about, even on a dark day…

    You see those pictures that ran with the AP and P&C stories above? Those were taken at the 2018 debate in Greenville.

    They made me think of this picture I took a few hours before that, when ETV was doing sound checks or whatever you call them:

    That’s Campaign Manager Scott Hogan pretending to be Henry. This photo is the only known documentation of a moment when Hogan was better dressed than James. Scott is wearing his only known suit, which he had bought a few days earlier for the Joe Biden appearance in Charleston. James is saving the suit he had brought for the debate for that night.

    See how Scott, as Henry, is pretending to be shocked and appalled at something James had said? Well, I’m not faking in reacting that way to what happened yesterday…

    Reply
  2. Ken

    Ask Caskey why, in his view, his fellow Rep., Representative Neil Collins, from the conservative, anti-abortion Upcountry, was not persuaded to vote to recommit and instead joined the Dems. against. And how he rationalizes their different behaviors.

    Reply
    1. Barry

      Neil intentionally tries to compromise and reach across the aisle of he can.

      I would also guess Neil thinks James Smith is a good person, an honorable person and feels he’d make a good judge. I think that is all that would matter to Neil.

      That’s not Micah.

      Reply
      1. Robert Amundson

        I hope Brad understands the difference between Mr. Collins and his Representative Mr. Caskey. Seems that in his elected leadership position Mr. Collins leads, while Mr. Caskey follows.

        Reply
  3. Barry

    1) Ralph Norman got involved in the state issue with his irresponsible and bombastic social media comments trying to nationalize a local judicial selection process.

    Ralph’s comments were as moronic as one would expect from a law breaker like Ralph (gun incident where he pulled out a loaded handgun in a restaurant. He was a CWP holder. It’s illegal for a CWP holder to take out their weapon in a public setting except for self defense actions. But law enforcement didn’t hold him accountable because he’s a politician.

    2) Folks like Micah Caskey let folks like Ralph Norman win.

    3) Never understood why you support Micah Caskey anyway. I’ve followed him closely and his votes. He’s a Freedom Caucus extremist without the nutty rhetoric- dressed up a little nicer with a few family stories thrown in. He votes nearly the same way- but will say it’s for different reasons. The results are almost always the same.

    In other words – I smacked you across the face Brad. But it was because I actually like you. It’s not because I dislike you.

    4) I have no idea what kind of judge he would be. The legislature gives such judges very little discretion on most issues and certainly no ability to rule on something that is clearly spelled out in state law.

    5) I’m sorry you are meeting Micah. I’m sure you’ll come away understanding his position and he’ll explain it perfectly well as politicians are known to do when necessary. Someone telling him face to face in a serious manner they were disappointed in him is not something he faces very much.

    Reply
  4. Barry

    “we now live in a country in which Republican lawmakers will do any contemptible thing — even abandon Ukraine to the bloodthirsty predations of Vladimir Putin — to pacify the loudest, most outrageous lunatics in their ranks, people they would have laughed at a few years ago. That’s what we have sunk to.”

    This week- FINALLY- we’ve seen a small group of Congressional House Republicans say that there are some Republicans in the House that do want Russia to win in their invasion of Ukraine. They are Russian supporters and generally admire Putin and believe anything he says.

    It took a long time for them to admit it- but now some are admitting it publicly.

    Reply
    1. Doug Ross

      Saying you don’t want to continue to give billions of dollars (of money created from thin air) to Ukraine when there are far greater priorities domestically doesn’t make anyone a Putin supporter. Ukraine has proven they can’t win.. nobody in their right mind ever thought they could… but Zelensky will keep taking the money as long as we’re dumb enough to send it. On the other hand, if the US is actually serious about defeating Putin instead of creating huge profits for defense contractors, let’s see Biden call for U.S. troops on the ground fighting side by side with the Ukrainians… Deficit tax dollars? Sure, we’ll send those all day long… because if Putin WAS defeated, then we’d have to invent another boogeyman to “fight”.

      Biden has reached the point now that he’ll spend, spend, spend as many deficit dollars that it takes to get re-elected. Why should he care? He’ll be dead by the time the massive deficits he approved tank the economy.

      Reply
      1. Brad Warthen Post author

        “Saying you don’t want to continue to give billions of dollars (of money created from thin air) to Ukraine when there are far greater priorities domestically doesn’t make anyone a Putin supporter.”

        Yes, it does. And don’t bother explaining to me that that’s not true, and explaining what YOU think, etc. It most definitely helps Putin, more than anything else you could do (or, as in this case, fail to do).

        Reply
    2. Robert Amundson

      Yes, and Brad posted about that victory. Finally some Hope. I wrote on another post about my family in the Philippines. My 6 year old is named Hope. Spectral Mornings: Although we are just tears and rust, please remember, there is always HOPE.

      I am living the future of multicultural and diverse. We need the Philippines – at times diplomacy is informal.

      Reply
  5. bud

    I have zero sympathy for your post here. None. Zip. Nada. You endorsed that Caskey idiot and even put out a yard sign that prominently displayed his vile party affiliation! This was as predictable as the sun rising in the east. Or the effects of gravity.

    Reply
    1. Brad Warthen Post author

      I realize it looks that way to you. But I don’t get the “no sympathy” part. This is something you blame ME for. How does that translate to no sympathy for James (not that he needs it, as I said), or for the judiciary, or for a state in which our judges are chosen in such a manner?

      Unless your attitude is just, “The hell with everybody,” it seems like you might work up some sympathy…

      Reply
      1. Barry

        There are some elected officials that look to compromise and work together as a matter of routine, day to day effort.

        Too many, Micah is one, aren’t really interested in that course of action. But he talks a good game and to many, talking a good game is really all that matters.

        Reply
        1. Brad Warthen Post author

          Actually, you’re mistaken there. Micah does compromise with people he disagrees with. The problem is, that people on all sides. In this case, he’s working with the Freedom Caucus types, a faction he generally does not get along with.

          But see, that’s a bad thing, compromizing with those folks.

          Willingness to compromise is a good thing. But not always…

          Reply
      2. bud

        Damn right I blame you. You’re an enabler. Until you get your head out of the sand and recognize this is the crap we’re going to get from the Gaslighting Odious Pander (GOP) party this is what we’re going to get.

        Reply
    2. Doug Ross

      On this, bud and I can agree. Caskey is a pure politician.. he was part of the gang that killed Tom Davis’ very restrictive medical marijuana bill two years ago to appease the holy rollers and busy bodies in the district. Nevermind that polls show very strong support for legal pot… gotta keep the pastors and sheriffs on his good side.

      Reply
    3. Doug Ross

      The only honest response Caskey could give in this situation would be: “I want to stay in office for the rest of my life like the rest of the Republicans”

      Reply
  6. Robert Amundson

    You know I supported James, BUT: “University of South Carolina President Bob Caslen announced two new hires Monday: new Chief of Staff Col. Mark Bieger, and James Smith, who will serve as interim special assistant to the president. Caslen praised Smith’s record of public service in announcing his new role at the university.

    ” ‘James Smith has devoted his life to serving the people of South Carolina — as a combat veteran, state legislator and community leader — and I am proud that he has agreed to serve on my team. James was an invaluable asset when I first took over, navigating the complex dynamics among faculty, student body, alumni, legislators, local politicians and leaders of influence. I have grown to trust him and to count on his judgement, as I recognize the need to continue to build these relationships. James has helped to make this university stronger, and I look forward to working with him as we continue to better serve our students, researchers, faculty and the people of South Carolina.’ ”

    That was a serious political miscalculation, for which there are consequences. I’ve known James for over 20 years, but even war heroes can struggle politically. John McCain was so flawed – The Keating Five Scandal. The Savings and Loan (S&L) Crisis was a slow-moving financial disaster. The crisis came to a head and resulted in the failure of nearly a third of the 3,234 savings and loan associations in the United States between 1986 and 1995.

    During this crisis, five U.S. senators known as the Keating Five were investigated by the Senate Ethics Committee due to the $1.5 million in campaign contributions they accepted from Charles Keating, head of the Lincoln Savings and Loan Association. These senators were accused of pressuring the Federal Home Loan Banking Board to overlook suspicious activities in which Keating had participated. The Keating Five included one of my war heroes, John McCain.

    Presidential Candidate McCain chose Sarah Palin as a running mate. Sigh. Hope “nuff said,” made my point.

    Reply
    1. Brad Warthen Post author

      It wasn’t a political calculation. James lost friends over that, in addition to doing himself broader political harm. He just went with what he believed…

      Reply
  7. Barry

    “I’m meeting with him tomorrow. I’ll let you know if he has a good explanation for yesterday, or if anything else newsworthy is said.”

    Well?

    What did Micah say that would suggest and what evidence did he offer you that Micah honestly didn’t think James Smith could properly handle murder cases, robberies, domestic violence, DUI cases, and drug cases (99.9% of the ones circuit court judges deal with)?

    “Honestly” is the key word. Or did he just offer some Republican baloney talk about abortion.

    Did you push back on his dismissal of James given Micah is someone you support?

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *