Time we had one of these again:
- Senators Demand Investigation Into Ukraine Satellite Disruption — NYT — The key word in this lede is “bipartisan.” Here you go: “A bipartisan group of senators on Thursday demanded an investigation into disruptions to critical satellite communications and intelligence-sharing systems in Ukraine that they warned had undermined the country’s defenses against Russian attacks and endangered U.S. military and diplomatic personnel.”
- Trump’s Attacks on Voting Raise Fears He Will Try to Challenge Results — NYT — Ya think? The world’s most embarrassingly famous whiner, complaining again that he’s a victim? Well, I wouldn’t bet against it.
- Is society facing a rudeness epidemic? — Boston Globe — Hell, yeah! Why do ya have to ask? Are ya stupid or something? But seriously, folks, does anyone have to ask? We’ve been reading this same stuff for years now. And look at who is president of the United States right now for the second time, even though he presented the first time around all the evidence anyone could ever possibly have needed that he shouldn’t hold any office of public trust, much less this one. And rudeness is just the beginning with him. Which tells us the problem is epidemic with hundreds of millions of others.
- Pope Leo Undergoes ‘Successful’ Surgery to Remove Lung Nodule — America — He’s got something called adenocarcinoma, but his recovery sounds like it’s going well. He concelebrated Mass at the hospital. I certainly hope and pray he recovers fully from this malignancy. I’m still mourning Pope Francis, and I like this guy, too.
- How Would You Regulate A.I.? — NYT — This is in quiz form. Some — but not all — of my answers were pretty much in sync with the Times’ panel. But that doesn’t mean we’re right. These are mostly fairly tough questions, but good food for thought. Real thought, not the fake kind…
- Globe endorses switch to sane electoral system — Boston Globe — I didn’t know Massachusetts was considering this, but I applaud it enthusiastically. It would replace party primaries — which up there guarantee that Democrats win in November, just as S.C. assures victory for Republicans — with a single primary that makes no reference to party. Everybody would choose their top two candidates, and that’s who would be on the general election ballot. This is the way it should be everywhere. It eliminates party control of single-member districts, and stop the radicalization of both parties, which now ensures that Trumpists win GOP primaries, and is almost as bad about picking “socialist democrats” in Democratic contests. Of course, it won’t ever happen here unless Trumpists decide to make our elections fair. So, you know, a high hurdle.
Sorry if this “news” is a day or two old (the only one from today is the last one). Just as I was finishing writing it yesterday, I got a call that something was flooding over at my mother’s house and had to run deal with it. So I just got back to it. The plumbers are now at work, and I’ll be back over there later…































