Well, they’re getting more specific, anyway…

All of us probably get spam claiming that we owe a fine for, say, traveling on a toll road, and if we don’t pay right NOW, all sorts of mean, nasty, ugly penalties will be imposed upon us.

I had an uptick of those last summer, shortly after we’d spent a week in Florida (where they actually have such roads), so just to make sure, I scanned them… and saw that they not only failed to mention Florida (or ANY state) or its state government, but had no mention of a date or location where said offense allegedly occurred. I’d received legit notices (by snail mail, I believe) correctly mentioning my having actually traveled on this or that toll road on such-and-such a date, and had paid them. (I wonder what happened to all those folks who used to staff tollbooths….)

So, spam. Perhaps directly seeking my money, but like as not just wanting me to respond so that my identity might be stolen.

So I ditched them, and all the similar nonsense I’ve received since then.

But this one today was interesting. Here’s the whole text, although I urge you NOT to go to the URL mentioned (I’d like to, out of curiosity, and in case the state of South Carolina actually has switched to such an idiotically suspicious mode of communication, but worry that that’s just what the scammers want):

South Carolina Department of Vehicles (DMV) Final Notice: Enforcement Penalties Begin on June 5.
Our records show that as of today, you still have an outstanding traffic ticket. In accordance with New South Carolina Administrative Code 15C-16.003, if you do not complete payment by June 4, 2025, we will take the following actions:

1. Report to the DMV violation database
2. Suspend your vehicle registration starting June 5
3. Suspend driving privileges for 30 days
4. Transfer to a toll booth and charge a 35% service fee
5. You may be prosecuted and your credit score will be affected
Pay Now:

https://scdmv.gov-xfpp.cc/pay (I post this not for your risky use, but to see if you’ve seen this same ploy before, and can shed light)

Please pay immediately before enforcement to avoid license suspension and further legal disputes.
(Reply Y and re-open this message to click the link, or copy it to your browser.) (Uh, no — don’t do that.)

Are you getting that one? Or does the DOT really want my money, or else? And if so, for what — seeing there is no mention of the specific offense, or when or where I supposedly committed it?

The alarming “Final Notice” is entertaining, though — seeing as there were no previous notices.

It came, by the way, from “websterisabel@marchmail.com.” Shame on you, Isabel! (Unless, of course, this is legit. In which case I await notification — first notification — of the specifics. You know how to reach me.)

Smoke signals

Coming home from Mass Sunday night, I saw what you see in the picture above — a strange, dull, red sun in a hazy sky, far too high to be that color.

Stopping at a light to take the picture, I pointed out that there was an odd haze in the air, “and not a purple one, either.” It wasn’t just the sun; it was barely detectable as I looked down Sunset Boulevard ahead of me. I asked my wife to check her weather apps.

She said one of them reported that wildfire smoke could be expected Monday morning. “Well, it’s here now.”

I suppose it’s a measure of how little I pay attention to news these days, so when I ran across this in The Washington Post this morning, I had to look for something tying it to South Carolina. I found this:

Smoke from Canadian wildfires moved into the Palmetto state this weekend. Most of the smoke particles and ozone associated with the fires are present at higher elevations in the atmosphere, but the added pollution from the fires also contributes to an increase in ground level ozone. Local weather conditions are also contributing to an increasing in ground level ozone. The stable layer of air near the surface and the light winds in the upstate Monday are preventing mixing and allowing ozone levels to build up.

I guess that’s what it was. There was a time when I would have been aware of this earlier, not because of looking for it, but because, well, local newspapers used to go sort of nuts over weather phenomena, so I couldn’t miss it. No more.

But the world is still with us, whether covered or not. Interesting that I could see what was happening in Manitoba just driving through West Columbia. Perhaps that red sun had given me, temporarily, one of Superman’s powers.

At least we’re not in North Dakota, something for which I am constantly grateful, whenever the place comes to mind. Which isn’t all that often…

The mind of a soldier, and the soul of a country

What causes them to charge into enemy fire?

I’ve mentioned before that I’m cleaning up old emails that backed up way last summer when we were in Europe. Well, I’m still doing it, making my way through a few hundred each day. Which is progress, just not fast progress.

Anyway, today I ran across something I had set aside to consider writing about (which I may have done in passing; I don’t recall now). It was an Ezra Klein podcast (he’s always good) headlined, “What’s Wrong With Trump?

I gave you a link to that if you want to go back and hear it, or read the transcript. But I’d rather you spend time reading what I’m thinking about today, which is on the much larger topic, which is Trumpism, and what is wrong with that. Which is, of course, an immense topic (since it’s about what is killing our country), but this is at least a digestible bite out of the subject.

It’s a David Brooks column from several days ago, and it’s headlined, “I’m Normally a Mild Guy. Here’s What’s Pushed Me Over the Edge.” (That, by the way, is one of those “share full article” links that the NYT offers, so please let me know whether it works for you).

It very much goes to the core of my own views, because it arises from Brooks’ marked tendencies toward communitarianism, which is one of the main reasons I enjoy reading him, and am often inspired by his words.

He starts this way:

Last Monday afternoon, I was communing with my phone when I came across a Memorial Day essay that the Notre Dame political scientist Patrick Deneen wrote back in 2009. In that essay, Deneen argued that soldiers aren’t motivated to risk their lives in combat by their ideals. He wrote, “They die not for abstractions — ideas, ideals, natural right, the American way of life, rights, or even their fellow citizens — so much as they are willing to brave all for the men and women of their unit.”

This may seem like a strange thing to get angry about. After all, fighting for your buddies is a noble thing to do. But Deneen is the Lawrence Welk of postliberalism, the popularizer of the closest thing the Trump administration has to a guiding philosophy. He’s a central figure in the national conservatism movement, the place where a lot of Trump acolytes cut their teeth….

He then mentions that J.D. Vance made a similar point at his inauguration, and that “these little statements point to the moral rot at the core of Trumpism, which every day disgraces our country, which we are proud of and love. Trumpism can be seen as a giant attempt to amputate the highest aspirations of the human spirit and to reduce us to our most primitive, atavistic tendencies.”

Of course, Brooks isn’t saying soldiers don’t lay their lives on the line for their buddies. “Of course warriors fight for their comrades.” And they do. I’ve made that point many times on this blog. (Based of course upon study, not personal experience. But what I’m studying is the experiences and memories of combat veterans.) When battle is at its hairiest, that’s an essential factor that keeps soldiers from turning tail and running — the comrades beside them. To see what happens when that factor breaks down, read the first part of The Red Badge of Courage, when the protagonist flees the battlefield because others around him are doing the same.

But there are larger questions — the factors that cause a someone to become a soldier to begin with, and don the uniform and go through all that training, long before they’ve even met those comrades who will keep them from running.

That’s what Brooks is writing about. And it’s what Deneen and Vance are dumping on when they say soldiers are never motivated by “abstractions — ideas, ideals, natural right, the American way of life, rights, or even their fellow citizens.”

That is not only an insult of immense proportions to soldiers (and sailors and Marines and others who serve) but to all Americans, whether they’re capable of perceiving the insult or not. It’s an insult to the idea of America. It’s an insult to ideas, period — to democracy, to freedom, to humanity, to God. It reduces us to grunting animals who can’t see past their own feeding troughs, and don’t care.

So it’s worth getting “angry about,” as Brooks so mildly puts it:

Deneen’s and Vance’s comments about men in combat are part of a larger project at the core of Trumpism. It is to rebut the notion that America is not only a homeland, though it is that, but it is also an idea and a moral cause — that America stands for a set of universal principles: the principle that all men are created equal, that they are endowed with inalienable rights, that democracy is the form of government that best recognizes human dignity and best honors beings who are made in the image of God.

There are two forms of nationalism. There is the aspirational nationalism of people, ranging from Abraham Lincoln to Ronald Reagan to Joe Biden, who emphasize that America is not only a land but was founded to embody and spread the ideals expressed in the Declaration of Independence and the Gettysburg Address. Then there is the ancestors and homeland nationalism, traditionally more common in Europe, of Donald Trump and Vance, the belief that America is just another collection of people whose job is to take care of our own. In his Republican National Convention acceptance speech Vance did acknowledge that America is partly a set of ideas (though he talked about religious liberty and pointedly not the Declaration). But then when it came time to define America, he talked about a cemetery in Kentucky where his ancestors have been buried for generations. That invocation is the dictionary definition of ancestors and homeland nationalism.

Trump and Vance have to rebut the idea that America is the embodiment of universal ideals. If America is an idea, then Black and brown people from all over the world can become Americans by coming here and believing that idea. If America is an idea, then Americans have a responsibility to promote democracy. We can’t betray democratic Ukraine in order to kowtow to a dictator like Vladimir Putin. If America is an idea, we have to care about human dignity and human rights. You can’t have a president go to Saudi Arabia, as Trump did this month, and effectively tell them we don’t care how you treat your people. If you want to dismember journalists you don’t like, we’re not going to worry about it….

Well, I’ve probably gone what the lawyers at the NYT would consider “Fair Use,” so I won’t quote any more.

But I urge you to go read the piece, and reflect upon it. It’s worth your time…

DeMarco (again!): Reflections of an inexperienced traveler

The Op-Ed Page

Our ‘inexperienced traveler,’ using his ‘feeble’ Italian to ask Signore Giugui for directions.

By Paul V. DeMarco
Guest Columnist

EDITOR’S NOTE: Paul sent me this the same day as the one about Dr. Ceriani, but I held it a couple of days to space them out a bit. When he sent it, he noted that this would be “more is your wheelhouse — genealogy and travel.” Indeed.

I just turned 62 and have traveled internationally as an adult three times in my life, all in the last 5 years (Tanzania with the USC School of Medicine in early 2020, just before COVID, and Italy and Sicily in 2022 and again in April 2025). Looked at one way, I am exceptionally lucky. Even one trip out of my own country is more than the vast majority of the world’s people are afforded. I have carried that knowledge with me on each trip and hope to continue to hold it close. I never want to lose the wonder I feel as a jet first leaves the ground or as I navigate a foreign land where I feel the obligation to represent my homeland well.

Being an amateur (and sometimes absent-minded) traveler does have its downsides. There was the time I tried to go through security with a Swiss army knife in my backpack. On the 2022 trip I left my laptop in the Rome airport (happily, I was finally able to retrieve it months later). And on this last trip we had an overnight layover in London coming home, but our luggage got checked through to our final destination (Charlotte). The silver lining was I didn’t have any difficulty picking out my outfit for the next morning’s flight home.

This last trip to Sicily was especially meaningful for two reasons. First, I had a merry band of companions – my wife, my son and daughter, and their spouses. Second, I was able to visit my grandfather’s birthplace for the first time.

My grandfather, Poppy, was born in 1903 in Porto Empedocle, a suburb of Agrigento, a city of about 55,000 on the southern coast of Sicily. The city is built on a ridge overlooking the azure blue waters of the Mediterranean and is home to some of the most well-preserved Greek temples in the world. We had a picture of his home that Poppy’s son, my father, had taken on a previous trip and a street name, but not a house number. Our driver took us to the high end of the street. We had a beautiful view of the sea, but I thought we should have started at the other, lower end.

As we exited the van, I had resigned myself to not finding the house. It would be enough to say that I had walked on the same street as he had. Like many Sicilians of his generation, he gambled that life in America was worth leaving everything he knew, making a transatlantic voyage, and staking a claim in the new world. At the conclusion of his journey, he sailed by the Statue of Liberty to Ellis Island. He spent the rest of his days in her shadow in a duplex nestled in an Italian neighborhood in the Flatbush neighborhood of Brooklyn. He married a first-generation Italian woman (my grandmother, Rosalie), worked as a barber, and had a side business repairing radios in the basement of their home.

As I was taking in the landscape of my ancestral home, my son had walked on ahead. “I think that’s it,” he said, pointing. We had found it. The feeling that I had then, and that I have now as I write about the moment is both precious and curious to me. It looked just like the picture my father had given me. I suspect, if I had done some research, I could have found it on Google Maps street view and seen it without ever leaving home. But blood ties are powerful and inescapable. There is nothing that could replace my being there, nor replace being home but knowing I have been there.

Charlie the dog wth ‘Sophia,,’ Debbie, Salvatore e Paul.

Even meeting people who were not closely related to me, but were my people, felt electric. In a raucous street market in Catania, on the eastern coast of Sicily, my wife, Debbie, made friends with a small dog. The dog (whose name. we soon learned, was Charlie), was accompanied by his elderly owner (Salvatore) and his dark-haired, dark-eyed granddaughter (whose name, unfortunately, we didn’t ask for). Let’s call her Sophia. Salvatore spoke no English, but we were able to converse with Sophia in a mix of her broken English and my feeble Italian. When she translated our question about how long Salvatore had owned the dog, tears rolled down his face as he kissed the dog again and again to indicate how much he loved him. As the two of them departed he kissed Debbie and me. For any readers planning on travelling to Sicily, be prepared – Sicilians do kiss a lot. I received many double-cheek kisses, both from women and men.

My family teases me for all the pictures I take on vacation. I probably took more than two thousand on this trip. But I am glad I took a selfie with the four of us and the little dog he loved so much. I have loaded that photo, pictures of Poppy’s birthplace, and many others from the trip on my digital frame. Those images are not just preserved in the dim file of my memory but are available to me as I walk by the frame, in vibrant color and astonishing detail.

I hope to return to Sicily many more times, but I want always to maintain my perspective as an inexperienced traveler.

A version of this column appeared in the May 14th edition of the Post and Courier-Pee Dee.

The moment of discovery: Ben points out Poppy’s home!

Dennis and his band were some wild and crazy guys!

Jump out of the way! Here come some Wild and Crazy Guys!

I met my daughter at the Habitat ReStore over the weekend to pickup up some furniture she bought there. While she was in line to pay for it, I browsed a bit.

Of course, I ended up making my way to the vinyl records department, and was impressed by some of the albums I found there. Lots of stuff from the 1950s.

But I really cracked up when I saw the title of this one: “CAUTION! MEN SWINGING

Jump out of the way, everybody! They are too hip for us!

I took it straight to the register, offered to pay the $1.25 marked on the cover, and found out it was only fifty cents!

The cover was just perfect! What ironic artistry — to pair that ultra desperate-to-seem-cool title with that whitebread gentleman in the Ban-Lon shirt (I think that’s a Ban-Lon shirt; I haven’t seen one in a while) who appears to be out mowing the lawn. In the background, I almost hear his wife calling, “And when you’re done with the grass, please fix our picket fence! It’s falling apart!”

Or maybe — I’m closely scrutinizing for “Paul is dead”-style clues here — Dennis and the guys got too close to that one board on the fence while swinging, and it stripped the paint right off!

OK, now I’m feeling bad, after looking up Dennis on Wikipedia. He was this cat who came down from Canada, and although I had never heard of him, he apparently made a bit of a mark in Hollywood:

His movie credits include the score for the 1966 Tony Curtis film Arrivederci, Baby!. For television, he composed music for the Bat Out of Hell (TV series); some episodes of the British children’s series Follyfoot (1971); and wrote the notable themes for Jay Ward‘s satiric Fractured Flickers (1961-3) and the London Weekend Television production Bouquet of Barbed Wire (1976). In 2002 EMI Records Ltd released “Soho Lounge Heat: Hip Jazz, Funk and Soul Grooves for Films & TV 1969-1977”, a compilation of library music compiled by Dickie Klenchblaize which contains 20 Farnon-composed tracks recorded between 1969 and 1974.

But even if he’d had no success at all, the guy was doing his best and probably loved his music and worked hard at it, so I shouldn’t make fun. But dang, he should have found the way to restrain those wild men in the RCA Victor marketing department when they pinned this label on his work.

Of course, to someone who entered his teens in the ’60s, anything that looks in any way like it had to do with the ’50s is obviously, painfully uncool. (And this was about 1958, according to the liner notes.) Therefore, the idea of this Perry Como-looking fellow’s band “swinging” so hard everyone needed to get out of their way is patently hilarious.

But forgive me, Dennis. You were probably much cooler than I. I see that some of your music was featured on “Ren and Stimpy”, and as we all know, they’re way existential.

By the way, if you want to actually hear how cool, or un-, Dennis and his band were, you can hear the whole album here, without shelling out fifty cents….

The new Steel Hands uptown location

I guess I should have taken a shot of the area where the customers sit. It’s very nice. But all this shiny new gear impressed me more…

Well, here’s a local business that appears to be doing well.

I just share this because I ran across the new, downtown Steel Hands brewpub on Gervais Street in the Vista. I had no idea it was there — I just thought of it as that place a bit hidden away off Frink Street.

According to the barkeep, it’s been there since October, but I don’t walk up and down that street as much as I used to. I would have stopped for a pint in addition to satisfying my curiosity, but it was around lunchtime yesterday and I needed to get home.

It’s nice to see something born in a less visible part of Cayce going all uptown like that.

I wish Hunter-Gatherer would do that; I miss the loss of it from the dowtown area. Don’t get me wrong — I love the historic hangar location out at Owens Field. Bryan Caskey and I met there a few weeks back to share some pints and talk baseball. I had the ESB, which I think is the best beer brewed in Columbia.

Of course, pubs can’t make business decisions based on what I want. I’m not what most would call a regular customer. I hadn’t been out to the hangar since Election Eve in 2018, It was the way we ended our odyssey on The Bus. I didn’t even spend any money there then, but other folks brought me a couple of ESBs that night as I stepped off the bus. Which was nice after that long haul…

DeMarco: The images that shape our lives

The Op-Ed Page

Dr. Ernest Guy Ceriani

By Paul V. DeMarco
Guest Columnist

As a graduation present, one of my best friends from college gave me a book titled Let Truth Be the Prejudice by photojournalist W. Eugene Smith. She knew I was on my way to medical school and chose the book because of a photo essay called “Country Doctor.” It documented the work of Ernest Ceriani, the sole physician for the people of Kremmling, Colorado, an isolated hamlet of about a thousand. The essay was published in 1948, when Ceriani was 32.

The images captivated me. There was a reality, a chest grabbing truth contained within. Smith said of the essay “I spent four weeks living with him. I made very few pictures at first. I mainly tried to learn what made the doctor tick.”

His patience was rewarded. The image that has been my lodestar captures Ceriani in the wee hours. He is in a homey hospital kitchen after completing a lengthy surgery. He wears a cloth surgical gown and cap. His mask is untied. He is slumped against the counter with the stub of a cigarette in his left hand and a slightly listing cup of coffee in his right. His exhaustion is palpable. In another photo (see below), he is holding the head of a 2-year-old child who had been kicked in the head by a horse. His brow is deeply furrowed. He is worried, afraid for the child’s sight. In another, he is on a home visit. He is sitting on a bed, listening to the chest of an elderly man dying of a heart attack.

I must admit that I had no idea what I had signed up for when I committed to medicine. I was the first doctor in my family and had never experienced a serious illness, nor had any family member or friend. I didn’t have a mentor to tell me what medicine would be like, but in a moment, these stark black and white photos showed me. I saw that being a doctor means to sometimes be afraid, to sometimes suffer, to carry the burden of your patient’s illnesses, to watch them die.

I write this not to tell you I have succeeded in my hope to follow in Ceriani’s footsteps. He bore a burden that I doubt I could have carried. Nor is it to say that the type of medicine I do is the most important or most difficult. There are physicians that put their lives on the line in war zones, brilliant bench researchers, and masterful surgeons whose accomplishments dwarf mine.

I tell you this for two reasons. First because Ceriani’s example is still powerful, and should remain relevant in patient care of all kinds, including quotidian practices such as mine. I teach medical students and give a talk every year entitled “Joy in Medicine.” Perhaps that wasn’t the title you would expect, given my description of medicine’s trials. Medicine is, of course, also full of joys and rewards. But accepting those requires no training. What allows doctors to maintain their sanguinity is an ability to anticipate and then face tragedy.

Physicians can make two mistakes confronting this reality. One is to be subsumed by the distress of their patients and become overwhelmed. But the more common mistake is to remain aloof, to treat medicine as a job rather than a vocation, as a means to a lifestyle. In these days of incentive contracts which reward physicians for increasing the number of patients they see or procedures they do, patients who gum up the works with thorny problems or unexpected complications become unwelcome. I can’t count the number of patients who over the years have broken into tears during a visit. There is no extra reimbursement for giving a despondent patient your undivided attention. I can rarely offer any helpful advice. But I do all I can do, which is listen. Surprisingly often, we both feel better for the time we spend together.

I ask the students to imagine a middle way in which we do our best to fully acknowledge our patient’s dignity without losing our bearings. I have had patients who have suffered unimaginably. One dealt with the death of her husband and then the tragic death of her son two days later. I can only go a certain distance into that pain. But I try to walk with the patient far enough.

Students want to know how far that is. I can’t fully articulate it. It’s the same sense I have that keeps me from getting too close to a campfire or to a cliff. Sometimes I go farther than I might, knowing that I will have help recovering. My medical colleagues, including my wife, who is a nurse and has lived the pressures of primary care practice with me, are there to support me in my temporary grief for my patients.

I have walked that line mostly successfully for thirty years thanks to the lessons contained in “Country Doctor.” Some days I don’t give enough, and others I let the pressure of getting the work done truncate my ability to fully engage. I could not have lived Dr. Ceriani’s life as a solo practitioner in the Rocky Mountains. But he has been my constant inspiration, and I am surely better for my friend’s thoughtful gift, one of the most important I have ever received.

A version of this column appeared in the April 16th edition of the Post and Courier-Pee Dee.

Open Thread for Wednesday, May 21, 2025

We haven’t had one of these in awhile, so here goes:

  1. May God send his healing grace upon Joe Biden — I’m so sorry, but not surprised (given the wearing toll of the presidency), to hear of Joe’s cancer. I had so hoped he, in his forced retirement, would have a few healthy years to enjoy the company of his grandchildren. They say that he may have some years left. I pray that is so, and that they are happy, comfortable ones. He deserves that, if anyone does.
  2. Which is dumber: ‘Star Wars’ or ‘Golden Dome?’ — I just mean the name, not so much the idea of a missile defense system. Once upon a time, military plans bore names that took some pains to be discrete, and secure: Overlord, Torch, MIncemeat. That showed some dignity. Now that marketing has overruled security (we want the adversary to know we have these kinds of plans), we go for the dumbest, least imaginative names we can think of, going for the very lowest common denominators to make sure everyone in our increasingly culturally illiterate world will get it, and Be Afraid. Or something. Even upcoming offensive operations (Operation Iraqi Freedom) follow this new style. Which seems very plastic, to an embarrassing degree. I’m picturing a certain high elected official saying, “The Israelis have an ‘Iron Dome.’ Let’s call ours ‘Lead Dome,’ or ‘Tin Dome.’ No, wait! I love gilded things! Let’s call it GOLDEN DOME!”
  3. I’m running to retire Lindsey Graham — That’s the headline on an email I got from a guy named Lee Johnson. Who’s Lee Johnson? I dunno. I’ve never seen him do anything else in public life before running for this lofty office. Based on his website, that’s because he’s an engineer who hasn’t done anything along those lines, unless he has and he’s just keeping that a secret, in a bid for the Trump vote. I’m not criticizing this guy. Bless him for trying. I’m bemoaning that this is our situation today. We live in a world in which no Democrat who knows anything about politics would consider wasting the time, energy and money on such a race. That said, I hope he wins, just to dissipate everyone’s cynicism, including my own. You go, Lee…
  4. Justice Opens Inquiry Into Cuomo, Singling Out Another Political Target — Yeah, this is the same Justice Department that just dropped charges against Eric Adams, against whom Cuomo is running. Yeah, that’s the Justice Department under the guy who was convicted on 34 felony charges last year, and is still walking around free. How are you feeling these days about that glory of the American system, the Rule of Law?
  5. A Guardian ad saved my family from the Nazis — Wow. That was the headline on an email marketing The Guardian — but it wasn’t written by marketers. That’s the actual family story of Jordan Barger, senior international correspondent. You should check it out. And since The Guardian didn’t have pay walls last time I looked, I think maybe you can.
  6. Norm! — I figured the best way to mark his passing would be to link you to the home newspaper of Cheers. You might not be able to read it, though. But you already know this sad news, don’t you?

 

 

Rob says it ain’t so, finally

“Rob” being Rob Manfred, mentioned in this lede:

NEW YORK — Pete Rose and “Shoeless” Joe Jackson were reinstated by baseball commissioner Rob Manfred on Tuesday, making both eligible for the sport’s Hall of Fame after their careers were tarnished by sports gambling scandals….

At least our fellow South Carolinian Joe Jackson got mentioned in the lede (and the headline) in The Boston Globe. The NYT only named Pete.

I suppose that makes sense, in an era in which news media seem to be unaware of things that happened a week ago, much less a century back. I suppose it’s a bit of a miracle that they remember Pete Rose, who died way back in September.

I remember Pete mainly from my one in-person meeting with him. I was probably about 14, and he was still in his crewcut days. (He never looked quite right to me with his hair grown out. Not like himself. It looked unnatural, like he was wearing a wig that didn’t fit him right. Like he was impersonating Moe Howard.)

This was in those glorious days when we lived in Tampa, with at least three teams — the Reds, the Cardinals and the Mets — having their spring training bases right there in the bay area. We went to a lot of games, although we only went to see the Mets once, after my little brother walked all the way across a training field next to Tom Seaver, begging him for an autograph, and Seaver never even looked at him. (This was the spring after they had shed their rep as the Joke of the World and actually won the World Series. Their heads were very swollen.)

That was an outrage because it violated the established spirit of informality that characterized spring training in those days. Tickets to the exhibition games were cheap, the players were entirely accessible, and if you couldn’t get at least a dozen good autographs at a game, you weren’t trying.

The Reds were right there in Tampa, and we enjoyed going to see the team that included not only Charlie Hustle, but that great rookie Johnny Bench. Anyway, to get to my story…

After one Reds game, my Dad told us to wait outside a minute while he stepped into the locker room. Yeah, you could do that. It would ever have occurred to me to try, but my Dad had played sports at a high level all his life, which paid for his college education, and I suppose he was more at home in such a sanctorum. Of course, it might just have been that he was a great Dad.

I waited outside holding my then-new Rawlings glove, the best glove I ever had. My Dad came back out and told me to go on in, because Pete Rose had promised to sign it for me. I felt about like a medieval urchin who’d been told to cross the drawbridge and go on into the castle because the King wanted to knight me.

But I went, and there he was. He was sitting on a table with his feet on the bench seat. He was in the middle of an interview. The sportswriter had interrupted him in the middle of preparing to shower. He had removed his shirt, but was still in his pants and cleats. He never really looked at me, being intent on the sportwriter’s questions, his head slightly cocked to one side as he listened, and then answering. But he reached out and took the glove and signed it, out on the thumb, while talking.

It was a beautiful autograph. He had a great, clear, handwriting — as clear as the “Willie Mays” autograph that came on the Rawlings glove from the factory. I was amazed he had managed to write that clearly under the circumstances.

I showed it off proudly while it lasted. But it didn’t last. This was my everyday glove that I played ball with. I’m not the “don’t take the figurine out of the package” type. After a couple of years, it had worn off, and I suppose any force that it might have transmitted from Charlie Hustle to me faded with it. Maybe that’s why you don’t hear any anecdotes from me about playing in the big leagues.

But I appreciate Pete signing to this day, and yeah, he should definitely be in the Hall.

So should Joe Jackson. Not only was he a better hitter than many who are in the Hall already, but unlike Pete, he was innocent. Or at least relatively so. That’s what we hear, and I find the tales persuasive. Joe just went along with the other guys, but delivered nothing to the gamblers — he played his heart out in the 1919 Series.

Of course, Rob Manfred didn’t exactly say it ain’t so. But he’s saying Joe should be reinstated, and he certainly should. Pete, too. Whatever happened off the field, their accomplishments ON it deserve to be remembered, and honored…

Not my style, but I got a kick out of it…

I ran across this (slightly poorly cropped) photo of the reaction of Chicago’s two newspapers. I only ever worked at papers that took the Tribune’s approach — proper, sober, respectful, matter-of-fact. A bit of local pride expressed, but cool about it.

And that’s still the way for me.

But I got a kick out of The Sun-Times approach.

Too bad Chris Farley is no longer with us. SNL could have had some fun with the news. “Da Bears!”…

¿Hispano como yo?

On prominent display at All Good Books.

Over the weekend, my wife and I were browsing at All Good Books in Five Points — which you should definitely visit often, because Good Books are the only kind you find there — and ran across the volume you see above: America, América, by Greg Grandin.

From the jacket blurb:

The story of how the United States’ identity was formed is almost invariably told by looking east to Europe. But as Greg Grandin vividly demonstrates, the nation’s unique sense of itself was in fact forged facing south toward Latin America. In turn, Latin America developed its own identity in struggle with the looming colossus to the north. In this stunningly original reinterpretation of the New World, Grandin reveals how North and South emerged from a constant, turbulent engagement with each other…

Intriguing. Given my background, I want to read this book. I’ll put it on my Gimme List for Father’s Day, etc. I know many of the ways influence has flowed from the U.S. to the South, but I’m very interesting to see how he backs up the claim that it flows strongly the other way.

Since I lived in Ecuador longer than in any other one place in my childhood, Latin America had a huge effect in forming me. But I’ve been looking around me ever since, and the lack of consciousness of the rest of the hemisphere that I see in my fellow gringos continues to shock, after all these years. And of course, the foolishness that led to the results in our recent election has sunk us as a nation to new depths in that regard.

But until I read it, I can’t say much about the book. It reminds me, however, of something else I’ve been meaning to mention: Our new American pope — who was born in Chicago, to be sure, but has spent so much of his adult life in Peru — even to the point of dual citizenship. (Which I suppose drives the MAGA types who claim to be Catholic nuts. I mean the people who complained that he spoke no English in his first papal greeting.)

No doubt, Pope Leo XIV spent way more time in Peru than I spent in Ecuador. But hey, those were adult years. Kid years are like dog years, if not more so. A year is like an eon. Although I thoroughly enjoyed my time there, those two years, four-and-a-half months (from the ages of 9-11) seemed far longer than any one of the recent decades of my life.

You can tell as soon as he opens his mouth — in Spanish, that is. Also, when it comes to knowing a place and a people, I’m sure his time as a shepherd in Peru gave him an exponentially greater understanding and affinity than I gained goofing around in the streets of Guayaquil.

But still, I feel an affinity. Sort of the way I did with both John McCain and Barack Obama in 2008. I wrote columns about that at the time (and ahem, I headlined the one about Obama “Barack Like Me,” a not-so-subtle literary reference that I have played upon again above).

He’s my kinda pope, so far. He’s also my kind of American — the kind who can think in languages other than English (alas, my own Spanish is in sad shape today), and cares about the rest of the world. This is the kind of leader the Church needs. It’s also the kind of leader America needs, more desperately than at any time in our chauvinistic history. I look forward to him being able to influence the course of events back in his own native country, which is no longer what it was when he and I were kids.

Of course, the parallels with Pope Francis are enormously sharper than any shared characteristics I can claim. Leo is an American who spent his ministry until recently in Peru. He was elevated to cardinal, and carefully placed in a pivotal position) by a son of Italian immigrants who spent his pre-papal life in Argentina.

My man Joe Biden failed rather spectacularly to set up some other sane, qualified person with the electoral appeal to succeed him. And as much as I love Joe, that’s what got us into our current disastrous predicament. (All I can say in Joe’s defense is that the Church offered more material to work with than the Democratic Party has lately.)

It appears that Francis succeeded just as spectacularly, setting up a seemingly ideal successor — who (while it remains to be seen for sure) seems to be like him in more meaningful ways than coming from South America. I pray that impression proves to be accurate.

Of course, Francis didn’t do it alone. I told y’all, during that brief hour or two between the white smoke and learning the new pope’s identity, that I was “trusting the Holy Spirit on this.”

I still am. And I’m very eager to see what happens next…

POSTSCRIPT:

Speaking of Black Like Me (parenthetically, several grafs above), when one applies the “one-drop” rule, Leo is also our first black pope. Well, I can’t claim to touch him in that category. Ancestry keeps going back and forth on just how Scottish I am, but it never wavers on the idea of me being totally, unforgiveably, European.

(Mind you, 23andMe says I’m .1 percent Somali. And Helix — the service MUSC used to analyze my DNA — has somehow discovered I am .3 East Asian! “Austronesian-Filipino,” to be exact. But as a white boy who routinely shifts by 10 or 20 percent on Scottishness, depending on how Ancestry is reading the data that day, I suspect those tiny fractions are well within the margin of error. I will make no extragagant claims to possessing “color.”)

The Holy Father just keeps getting more cosmopolitan every moment! Especially since that part of his heritage came through New Orleans, the most cosmopolitan place I ever lived (that was right after Ecuador).

This is great, and very much as it should be. Remember above when I referred to “the MAGA types who claim to be Catholic?” I put it that way because “catholic” most assuredly does not mean “America First,” or America Only.

It means “universal.” And that’s what the Church, and all believers, must be…

‘Tis a very Irish day we’re after having…

You can still see the thin spots in the lawn, but overall, I mainly see GREEN.

Actually, I’m thinking perhaps I laid on my stereotypical idioms a bit thick there… but to move on…

Ireland from the air, the green a bit dulled by the haze.

The landscape seems transformed on this third day of rain. I haven’t seen this much green since we were in Ireland in 2019. (That was a cliche I was delighted to find confirmed — from the air before we landed, and everywhere we rode or walked across the land. “Emerald” is no exaggeration.)

There’s a piece of our yard that always looks green — having been regularly irrigated since we had sod laid last year in place of a bunch of runaway juniper that I suspected of harboring copperheads — but this is not that part. Yet now it’s almost lush.

How’s it going where you are? I sincerely hope you have not washed away, in spite of the apocalyptic flood warnings Alexa keeps issuing. I wonder whether Amazon would let me change her name to Cassandra?…

The view out back. I need to replace those couple of loose deck boards. If it ever stops raining.

WHITE SMOKE!

Congratulations to my diocese — as far as I’m concerned, Bishop Jacques Fabre-Jeune just scooped the world. I received first a text, then an email, from his office without having heard a word ere that.

Which is a bit surprising. I must have turned off more notifications from news sources than I thought.

Anyway, I then looked, and sure enough:

So now, everybody can pack up and go home, and stop trying so hard to predict who the new pope is. Or at least, they can when we actually know who he is.

I don’t remember this kind of blanket coverage in the past — when we lost John Paul II, or when Benedict retired. It has seemed, well, unseemly.

Some things should be done in private, without the jostling elbows of the world intruding. This is one of those things.

That may sound odd coming from an old newspaperman, but I’m also a (sort of, dating to my conversion in 1981) old Catholic. And I’ve got this archaic thing of trusting the Holy Spirit on this.

Oh, I may complain now and again about the new Holy Father — hey, no mortal is perfect — but I assure you I’m quite at peace on this as we receive the news…

A great monument to civil discourse falls, for now

Gail Collins and Bret Stephens enjoy each other’s company, before a cardboard dummy.

A couple of days back I tried to improve your moods by giving you some good news — although it was only good, I suppose, to me.

So back to bad news. Here’s some that should matter to everyone, but most people are probably entirely unaware of it:

After Eight Years of Challenging Each Other’s Politics, One More Chat for the Road

That’s a depressing thing I listened to on Tuesday, a thing that told me that after almost a decade (80 percent is “almost,” right? or at least almost almost) of setting an example for us all, Gail Collins and Bret Stephens were going to stop doing their weekly Conversation feature in The New York Times.

You’ve heard me praise it before. Here’s one example of the hagiography I’ve heaped upon it.

But if you’ve somehow missed it, here’s a brief explanation of what it was (you can read a longer one at that last link above): A weekly demonstration of how intelligent, civilized people discuss things about which they disagree.

Maybe that doesn’t sound like much, but such things are rare as hen’s teeth. Encountering such a feature is like finding a flawless diamond buried in a trash heap — the trash heap that is current political discourse in America.

Our world in the Year of Our Lord 2025 is desperately short of intelligent people (or at least, they’re very quiet and hard to find). And almost no one has any idea how to engage in civil discourse. So when you find two people who possess both those qualities demonstrating an exercise in the amicable, mutually respectful exchange of ideas, you’ve found a seam of gold.

And folks, this is not just about being nice to one’s neighbor, although in truth there’s nothing finer than that. This sort of sharing of thoughts is a necessity in this country — or at least it was, when the system our Framers gave us was functioning.

Ours is a deliberative form of government. For it to work, people with different ideas have to listen to each other, and learn from each other, so that they can come up with solutions that may thrill no one, but that address the issue before them effectively, and in a way that makes the country better.

The way this system is made to function, it is the precise opposite of tribalism. It is the opposite of huddling into groups, and never speaking to people in other groups except to tell them how much you despise them.

I started this blog long ago to provide a place where people could come together and converse in the way Bret Stephens and Gail Collins have been doing these last few years. You may think that was overly ambitious, or at least overly hopeful, of me. But not really. When I started in 2005, such things were still possible, and we had a lot of really good exchanges. Oh, there were a few people who came to win battles, to demonstrate how much smarter they were than everyone else, or simply to shout insults.

But most participants weren’t like that. It was normal for a post to have 100 comments, or 200, or even 300 on rare occasions. I was startled when I realized that I was getting more comments in a day than The State got letters in a week.

At first, the trolls were very few, and I simply ignored them. But then, some of the very best commenters — the ones most like Gail and Bret — started falling away. Frequently, they would say that what caused them to quit was the rising tide of negativity. And we were starting to get more. So I tried various approaches to a civility policy. But the tide just grew higher. Something quite corrosive was destroying the collective American mind. And now, we live in a country and a world that is shockingly different from what we had in 2005.

I got discouraged myself, and eventually spent less and less time here. The days when I quite normally posted 10 times and more are long gone, and hard to imagine now. I’ve posted a couple of times this week, but it’s been a few days since I’ve glanced at the pending comments, and I see that there are 18 of them (what a sad harvest after the 300 a day of years gone by!). I know that a number of them will be of the unpleasant sort. Hear me when I say that I will not approve any of those. If they don’t show at least a hint of the attitude I find in one of those NYT Conversations, they’re gone.

As for Collins and Stephens themselves, what’s their excuse for stopping this constructive collaboration? They’re not discouraged. So why? Well, it’s the usual answer we get when favorite columnists go away for awhile — they’re writing books! Well, these are fine folks, and I’m sure these will be fine books.

But I don’t see how they’ll do the country nearly as much good as The Conversation

 

Concerning the continuing slide of SNL…

If there was an SNL Golden Age, when was it?

I know that’s a bit of a cliche thing to say. People have been saying it for decades now, and it’s often been untrue, or at least misleading. The standard form is to say that these skits and actors today are a pale shadow compared to that first group — Belushi, Akroyd, etc.

In fact, even though I was the perfect age for the first-cast’s demographic, and enjoyed it very much at the time, I think the height of the show may been about 10-15 years later, with a stream of such bright lights as Eddie Murphy, Phil Hartman, Mike Myers, Dana Carvey, Jon Lovitz, Martin Short, Billy Crystal, Julia Louis-Dreyfus, and on and on. I think the slide started sometime after that.

By the turn of the century, most of the magic was gone. Most, but not all, by any means. When Tina Fey came back to do Sarah Palin (especially in the skit with Jason Sudeikis as Joe Biden) in 2008, we saw comic commentary reach the show’s highest peak ever. There were a few other funny bits in those couple of decades, but you had to wait for them, and the waits were long and sad.

Very sad.

I was reminded of this a couple of times today. I sort of forgot it after the first instance, but then a few minutes ago I saw this headline:

Canadian Prime Minister Carney rebuffs Trump’s push to make Canada the 51st state

… which of course brings up the main problem with doing political comedy in the age of Trump. How do you parody a guy who exceeds the comic sense of the absurd with everything he says and does.

Which took me back to the first thing, which I saw this morning on YouTube while working out:

My first thought when the still image appeared on my screen was, That guy again! The same guy who was such an awful Joe Biden!

I had to Google him to find out that he is James Austin Johnson. He might be acceptable in the role if I’d never seen anyone else do Biden or Trump, and actually be funny doing it — such as Sudeikis, or even Alec Baldwin.

Sudeikis was brilliant, and while his performance was chock full of flaws (and, if you’re a Trump admirer, unfair), it was still funny. And he didn’t even need the wig or makeup — if he started doing it on the street without such embellishments, you’d get it, and you’d laugh (unless you were one of those poor Trump admirers).

The thing is, the material in the skit embedded above wasn’t bad — some pretty good gags there. But the delivery was just so distractingly awful. It wasn’t the wig or the makeup. Think about Chevy Chase doing Gerald Ford — there was no wig or makeup, and he didn’t even try to sound like him. But it was funny. Which, I think, should be the point on a comedy show.

Maybe Mr. Johnson wrote some of those decent gags. If so, he should probably stick to that, and leave the funny to funny people.

And he’s not the only one that this could be said about, but I’ll stop with the meanness now…

Just so you know: I did NOT kill the fig trees

There’s so much bad news out there — pretty much nothing but — that I thought I’d share with you a bit of good.

Remember when I worried that I might have killed my fig trees when I pruned them a couple of months back?

Well, I didn’t. And I’m very glad, because one of those trees — the one you see at right — was given to me as a sapling by my uncle who died in 2016, and was therefore irreplaceable, at least on a personal level. Not only that, but as small as it still is — I’ve kept it from spreading like the other one — it bears more figs each year than the other one.

The other one, at top, is one I bought at the farmers’ market — the good old farmers’ market, located where people could find it — quite a few years ago. While my uncle’s tree is a reliable brown turkey, this one is… well, I forget the name that was on the label. Something Greek, I think. Anyway, it’s brilliant at producing leaves in great abundance (as you can see), but a slacker at yielding fruit. When it does force itself to do something useful, the fig is quite large, and never turns color. When it’s ripe, it’s still green, and you have to tell by touch whether it’s ready. But it’s very sweet, which is great. But we never get more than a handful in a season, if that.

Meanwhile, remember those four other trees I’m trying to propagate from cuttings I got from our friend Scout? Well, two of them are definitely among the living, but nowhere near ready for the ground. (See below.) The life seemed to have left the other two… but one of them is still showing a bit of green here and there. So I’m not giving up yet on either of the laggards.

Dum Spiro Spero.

Or perhaps in this case, that should be:

Dum Ramus Viridis Est Spero.

As least, that’s what Google Translate says…

I’ve put them in slightly roomier pots, but they still have a lot of growing to do.

Francis, who did not seek to be great, but was

Peggy Noonan dubbed John Paul II “John Paul the Great,” and who can argue with that? Not I. He certainly fit the description.

From the beginning, Jorge Mario Bergoglio did not seek to be great, in the coarser senses of the term. He signaled that by the first thing he did after his surprise election as pope — deciding to be the first pontiff in our time named “Francis,” after the man who chose a life of poverty, becoming a plain-robed itinerant preacher, a beggar in a time of particularly worldly clericalism.

If you wish to be a cynic (and too many do), you can call Pope Francis’ gestures — living outside the imperial quarters reserved for the pope, riding in a Ford Focus instead of a limo, saying “Who am I to judge?” — a theatrical form of PR if you like. The point, though, is that he chose to display thoughts and behavior consistent with being, first and foremost, a follower of the carpenter from Nazareth.

From the moment he came out on that balcony and said “Buon giorno” to the crowd, he was humble. He was kind. He bestowed his blessings and his love upon the poor, the suffering, the marginalized. He lived the Great Commandment: He loved God with all his heart, soul, mind and strength, and he loved his neighbor as himself. Or more than himself.

He lived his life as an example, one that the world in our time sorely needed, and still needs. And as our pope, he expected us to do the same.

And now, as badly as we need him, he’s gone.

There’s a lot of simplistic conjecture about whether his successor will be a liberal or conservative — reducing the choice of a Supreme Pontiff to the same gross, ones-and-zeroes foolishness that we allow to destroy our politics in this century.

As I grew to love Francis, I listened to those who deprecated him from both the “right” and the “left” — the kind of Catholics who would vote for Trump, and the Culture Warriors who kept saying he didn’t go “far enough,” as though his purpose was to please them by granting all their fondest wishes.

All of them helped me see that this good man was my kind of pope. And we need another just like him — except maybe younger, so he can stay with us longer.

Paul DeMarco: Cry, the Beloved Country

The Op-Ed Page

James Earl Jones in the film version of Cry, the Beloved Country.

By Paul V. DeMarco
Guest Columnist

Alan Paton’s 1948 novel, Cry, the Beloved Country, explores the South African apartheid system, which was formally instituted in the year of its publication. The protagonist, Stephen Kumalo, is a black minister of a rural congregation whose son commits a murder in a robbery gone wrong. The white man he kills, Arthur Jarvis, is, ironically, one of the few white people who is actively opposing the new apartheid regime.

Paton’s book was formative for me. It heightened my awareness of racial injustice in South Africa, America, and around the world. Recently, I have returned to the book with a different perspective, as I reflect on the changes in my country since Donald Trump was elected. The current injustices are different from those dealt with in the novel, but have been profoundly disquieting. My previous readings have been empathetic, finding my way into Kumalo’s sorrow and anger with a reader’s detachment. However, watching our new administration operate, my detachment is gone. I have become Kumalo.

In the decade since Trump entered presidential politics, I have, despite my grave misgivings about his character and rhetoric, tried to be generous in my view of him. Some of his policies make sense and align with my own. I think his border policy is more sensible than Biden’s was. He is correct to treat China as an existential threat. I agree with him that biological men should not be in women’s sports or other women-only spaces.

But, to my Republican friends I say, you could have had those policies with dozens of other candidates. None of them would have done to our country what Trump has done. For years his defenders chided his opponents for being worried about “a few mean tweets.” I don’t like trash-talking in politics. It simply makes compromising more difficult, and every piece of significant legislation involves compromise. Since it has become an accepted part of the American dialogue, I doubt there will be any turning back. Nevertheless, calling out other world leaders, especially the presidents of Canada and Mexico, our closest neighbors and two of our closest allies, is gratuitous and counterproductive.

However, the deep, agonizing cry that is silently reverberating in many Americans’ hearts is for Ukraine. This is exactly the kind of country that America should be supporting. I’m not a war monger. I have no interest in the U.S. starting or prolonging a war. I grieve for the dead and wounded on both sides and their families. As a physician, I have seen how tragedies affect patients and loved ones. It is impossible for a person to experience war and come away better for the experience.

Ukraine had no choice but to enter this war. They were invaded without provocation by a much larger country run by a murderous dictator. They responded just as America would, with searing rage and all the firepower they could muster. Most analysts expected the war to be over in weeks. Instead the Ukrainians have bravery held off the Russians for three years. Their democratically-elected president, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, showed commendable courage when he chose to stay rather than flee (as opposed to Trump, who dodged the draft, or his minion Josh Hawley, who ran for his life during the attack on the Capitol). Zelenskyy has made it easy for America to support him, asking only for weapons and ammunition. No American soldier will die in Ukraine.

I suspect we will recover quickly from much of the stupidity and vanity emanating from the White House, e.g., the Gulf of America, the turning of the South Lawn into a Tesla lot, or the threats to take over Greenland, Canada, and the Panama Canal. However, Trump’s choice to forsake Zelenskyy for Vladimir Putin, an authoritarian who censors free media, jails and kills his opponents, and rules by fear, will stain our flag for years to come. The simple question is “Which of these countries aspires to be more like America?” That was, until recently, the way we chose allies. America is the best and brightest hope for the planet. Our democratic system, as fractious and flawed as it is, and our political discourse, as polluted as it is, are still the envy of the world. We are free to say and do everything we want as long as it does not infringe on the rights of our fellow citizens. We will only remain free if we support other countries trying to become like us.

I have had my share of disagreements with past presidents, both those I voted for and those I didn’t. I have been angry before, but I have never felt that the president was trying to contort the United States into a country we don’t recognize and don’t want to be. In the novel, Kumalo says of his son Absalom after he has committed the murder, “Who knows if he ever thought of what he did, of what it meant to his mother and father, to the people of his village, to the white man he had killed, to the wife and children that were left desolate. Who knows if he had remorse, or if he wept for his broken country?”

When I read Kumalo’s last question over forty years ago at the University of Virginia, I never thought I would be asking it of my president.

A version of this column appeared in the March 19th, 2025 edition of the Post and Courier-Pee Dee.

So what else have you got?

My brother-in-law checking over the Nativity in 2019.

A brief Easter reflection. And no, it’s not too late. The Easter Season just started Sunday, and lasts until June 8…

My wife told me this one yesterday. Her youngest brother has had the same Nativity set on his lawn every Christmas season of his life — first at his parents’ home growing up, now at his own. It consists of several hollow plastic figures that I think were once lit from within, but are now illuminated with a spotlight. It’s getting a bit worn out — Mary had to be replaced a year or so ago — but it’s still something everybody in the family looks forward to, especially the kids.

His boys are grown now, and he has no grandchildren yet, so he’s been letting his older brothers’ grandchildren — who are all in the Memphis area — take turns each year with the honor of placing the baby Jesus on the manger.

This past season it was the year for the younger grandson of his oldest brother (whom we lost in 2020). Unfortunately, he didn’t get to do it on account of illness, from which he has fully recovered.

Time has passed, and the boy has gotten older — he turned 5 last month — but he hasn’t forgotten missing out.

So on Sunday, he approached his uncle and reminded him he had not gotten his chance to place the baby in the crèche. And he asked whether he could do it now.

My brother-in-law said well, no. The Nativity had been put away, because it was a Christmas/Epiphany thing. And now, it’s Easter.

So the boy thought for a moment, and tried a different angle. He asked:

“Well, have you got a tomb?”

Read a book. Please. And then go read some more…

There are plenty out there to choose from.

At the end of my previous post, I tried to offer hope in spite of the situation I was describing. I said there are still “plenty of smart people out there,” suggesting that even though I haven’t figured out a fix, some of them might. I could have named names, but as incredible as it may sound, I was restraining myself with all my might, trying to keep the post from being any longer than the 2,899 words I ended up with.

One of the names I might have mentioned is that of David Brooks. But y’all know I admire that guy’s work; I’ve said so often enough.

I mention him now because of his most recent column, which was blessedly shorter than mine, but eloquently addressed an important aspect of what I was on about. The headline is “Producing Something This Stupid Is the Achievement of a Lifetime.”

You should read the whole thing (after all, his point is that kids — and adults — today need to be reading something. I’ve tried to make it available by using the “share full article” link, but I’m still not sure whether that words for everybody if you post it on a blog, or is only meant for sharing by text or email with one or two friends).

If you can’t (or, being a person of the 21st century, simply won’t) read it all, here’s an excerpt from the top:

You might have seen the various data points suggesting that Americans are losing their ability to reason.

The trend starts with the young. The percentage of fourth graders who score below basic in reading skills on the National Assessment of Educational Progress tests is the highest it has been in 20 years. The percentage of eighth graders below basic was the highest in the exam’s three-decade history. A fourth grader who is below basic cannot grasp the sequence of events in a story. An eighth grader can’t grasp the main idea of an essay or identify the different sides of a debate.

Tests by the Program for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies tell a similar story, only for older folks. Adult numeracy and literacy skills across the globe have been declining since 2017. Tests from the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development show that test scores in adult literacy have been declining over the past decade…

Later, he quotes from a book by Jim Mattis and Bing West:

If you haven’t read hundreds of books, you are functionally illiterate, and you will be incompetent, because your personal experiences alone aren’t broad enough to sustain you…

Amen to that, warrior monk.

He doesn’t get to current news until the end:

What happens when people lose the ability to reason or render good judgments? Ladies and gentlemen, I present to you Donald Trump’s tariff policy. I’ve covered a lot of policies over the decades, some of which I supported and some of which I opposed. But I have never seen a policy as stupid as this one. It is based on false assumptions. It rests on no coherent argument in its favor. It relies on no empirical evidence. It has almost no experts on its side — from left, right or center. It is jumble-headedness exemplified. Trump himself personifies stupidity’s essential feature — self-satisfaction, an inability to recognize the flaws in your thinking. And of course when the approach led to absolutely predictable mayhem, Trump, lacking any coherent plan, backtracked, flip-flopped, responding impulsively to the pressures of the moment as his team struggled to keep up.

Producing something this stupid is not the work of a day; it is the achievement of a lifetime — relying on decades of incuriosity, decades of not cracking a book, decades of being impervious to evidence…

But as I say, that comes at the end. As I said in that last post, the larger point isn’t Donald Trump. It’s the rest of us, and our own avoidance of reading, to the point that a majority of us were willing to vote for someone like Trump.

He ends with the words, “Civilization was fun while it lasted.”

Yeah. As I said

So Brooks is one of those smart people I was talking about, and he’s offered a solution: Go out and read a book. And then read  a few hundred more. I would add that they should be history books, but hey, almost anything would be an improvement….