Category Archives: Sports

‘Top of the world, Ma!’

Circledoug

T
hat was the headline on this e-mail sent by blog regular Doug Ross. Here’s the text:

FYI, my picture is on the front page of the Sunday paper today… that’s
my son’s baseball team playing at Brookland-Cayce and that’s me sitting by myself down at the bottom of the stands behind home plate.   Some might say it’s my best side.  🙂

-dr

And that’s I believe, is the picture above. I doctored it Officer Obie-style, with a circle indicating Doug (I think). Doug, let me know if I’m circling the wrong guy.

Congratulations! Not even Grandmaster Bud has made the front page, so that’s saying something. Don’t ask me exactly what it says, but it must say something.

Oh, and for those of you who don’t recognize Doug’s movie allusion — it’s James Cagney in "White Heat." Here’s a clip.

NCAA on the warpath

You know, all week I’ve thought about posting something about the Newberry College ex-Indians and the NCAA, and that appallingly lockstep faculty vote in favor of this absurd dictate, but it’s just TOO ripe.

The whole situation puts me in mind of something Tom Wolfe once wrote — I forget where — about the "Fool-Killer" walking away in bewilderment, dragging his club, overwhelmed by the enormity of his opportunity…

Basically, I hate Kulturkampf topics such as this one, and I generally just turn away. That’s because on the one hand, I don’t care what Newberry College calls its sports teams, and on the other hand, I’m flabbergasted that someone would try to TELL Newberry it has to change that name, and offer no rational reason for said ultimatum — or at least, none that I’ve read so far. Then, on the third hand (see how irrational this is?) — if I were Newberry, I would simply ignore the NCAA and do what I wanted. But then, I don’t care anything for what any sports organization has to offer, since I have the unconventional point of view of seeing sports as games. In other words, if you care enough about the NCAA to let it boss you around, your priorities are sufficiently out of whack to make me have little sympathy for you.

Now that I’ve offended everyone involved, I’ll turn this topic over to you, the reader:

35 years of delayed gratification

Memphis

Yes, it was pretty sweet when John McCain finally made up for the historic miscarriage of justice in 2000 by winning the S.C. primary this time, andMemphis2 going on to win the nomination (presumptively speaking).

But hey, that was only 8 years.

We Memphis State fans (for so the school was called when Fred Thompson and I were there) have waited 35 years to make up for the heartbreaking NCAA final of 1973, when Wooden and Walton and company did in Larrys Finch and Kenon and the rest of the Tigers.

Minutes ago, Memphis moved on to the final by defeating, yes, UCLA!

Sweet.

Ucla

How clueless is Brad? Check his brackets

Brackets

Y
es, it’s that time of year when I truly do what so many of you think I do every day — offer my assessment about something that I know nothing about. In this case, the NCAA basketball tournament. Here’s last year’s effort. Above is an actual, undoctored photograph of the one I completed earlier today. (To keep me honest, you might want to print this one out, if you’re really that suspicious.)

I assure you that, once again, I’ve gotten through an entire season without watching, or checking the paper for the results of, a single game. No, wait — after hearing how excited my in-laws in Memphis were about a game between U. of Memphis and Tennessee, I did check the next morning to see how it came out. But I don’t remember which one won. I’m thinking it was UT, but then how did Memphis get seeded so high if that’s so? Whatever.

And no, I’m not going to go look up the answer, which would spoil the purity of my system for making predictions. I generally give the advantage to three kinds of teams:

  1. Schools that I or someone in my family have been associated with at some time or other (Like Fred Thompson, I’m a Memphis State grad, from the days when it was called Memphis State.)
  2. Catholic schools, or schools with Catholic-sounding names (I don’t know about St. Mary’s, but any school named for the Mother of God has to be good for at least one round, don’t you think?)
  3. Schools that were roundball powerhouses back when I was in college, as near as I can remember.

Oh, and I have one other rule — all things being roughly equal, bet on Duke. I did that for several rounds this year, getting them into the Final Four, but didn’t take them all the way.

Anyway, you’ll see that this year, I gave the most emphasis to Rule 1. Only time will tell if I was right.

Did the Chicken Curse stop Obama?

Why didn’t Barack Obama put it away last night? Well, you can look to all sorts of causes — he had been too far behind in Ohio and Texas to do more than almost catch Hillary Clinton; some of her criticism of his supposed lack of experience had had an effect in recent days; he was on a streak of unfavorable news that outweighed his streak of wins, etc.

But here’s an alternative theory: On the very day of the vote, the chairwoman of the S.C. Democratic Party endorsed him. Here’s what Carol Fowler said in a release from the campaign:

    “South Carolina Democrats have told me repeatedly that their greatest concern is that we nominate a candidate who can win in November, and who will help us build the Democratic Party across our state.  I have observed the presidential campaigns for more than a year, and there is no doubt in my mind that the Obama campaign has what it takes to bring us a Democratic president.  Senator Obama and his team have already made significant organizational contributions to the SC Democratic Party, and I expect their good work to continue through the fall campaign and into his administration.
    “Senator Obama has proven, through a lifetime of advocating for middle class families and workers, his unique ability to create change that matters in the lives of Americans.   He has proven his ability to win in the so-called "red states" like this one, and has brought countless new voters into the process.  The people of South Carolina chose change by a decisive margin on January 26th, and I’m proud to stand with voters across the country who have backed Barack Obama to win in November and to lead our country in a new direction.”

Maybe the Democrats in Ohio, unlike the Democrats in S.C., didn’t care to "nominate a candidate who can win in November." Or maybe, just maybe, it was… dare we say it … the Chicken Curse? Did a gratuitous, out-of-nowhere, five-weeks-plus-after-the-fact endorsement from a party chair from the home of the Gamecocks just have way too much bad mojo riding on it for Obama or anyone else to overcome?

The Curse has, of course, been more or less proven to have effects beyond the football field upon people or endeavors with incidental Gamecock connections — including in the realm of presidential politics. Most experts point with great confidence to the moment when Gary Hart’s chances turned to dust — it was when he decided to engage in monkey business with a former USC cheerleader.

There are those — strict constructionists, I suppose you might call them — who maintain that the curse is limited in its scope, that the cursed must have a brush with someone who has had direct contact with USC athletics, or (and these would be your hyperfundamentalists) just with the football program.

But these things are little understood by science. I think there’s more to it. If the effects can extend beyond athletics, might not the cause as well? Maybe you can get it just from association with anyone who has ever taught at USC, or driven through the campus. Or bet on a cockfight — and in South Carolina, that broadens the field considerably.

In any case, it’s not to be fooled with.

Politics as baseball

Readers who are well familiar with Washington Post columnist George Will know that he is also a baseball fan. Not a giddy, “don’t you love the smell of a glove well-conditioned with linseed oil?” kind of way, or a “Dad, do you want to play catch?” way. George Will is a fan of baseball in a serious, no-nonsense, highly complex, analytical sort of way.

Yes, baseball fans tend to be more obsessed with statistics than other kinds of sports fans, but most baseball fans haven’t written a book about that boys’ game titled Men at Work.

Only recently has it occurred to me the extent to which Mr. Will has taken to writing about politics as though it were baseball. Witness this passage from his column on today’s op-ed page:

    In 2000 and 2004, George W. Bush carried North Dakota with 60.7 percent and 62.9 percent of the vote. A Democratic presidential candidate has not carried the state since 1964. Bush carried South Dakota with 60.3 and 59.9. It has not voted Democratic in a presidential election since 1964. Bush carried Missouri with 50.4 and 53.3. This bellwether state has voted with the winner in every election but one (1956) in the last 100 years. Bush carried Nebraska with 62.2 and 65.9. It last voted Democratic in 1964. Bush carried Colorado with 50.8 and 51.7. It last voted Democratic in 1992. Bush carried Arizona with 51 and 54.9. It last voted Democratic in 1996. Bush carried Virginia with 52.5 and 53.7. It last voted Democratic in 1964. Bush narrowly lost Wisconsin with 47.6 and 49.3.

Sure, but how did Bush do against left-handers in post-season night games?

Perhaps Mr. Will hopes through such observations to impose a stately orderliness upon our politics, causing elections to seem as calmly rational as the game we used to call the national pastime. If only it could be so.

Good news! I’m not quitting to join the pro tour

Played golf today, out at Hidden Valley. Second time in the past year (first time was Friday). Just nine holes, which is good, because I would not have wanted to put any more strokes on that poor abused scorecard. Started off with a snowman on a par 4, but I did get better after that, just not by much.

Let’s look at the bright side:

  • I hit a really nice tee shot with my favorite club — an old persimmon 4 wood — on a long (about 200 yards) par 3, reaching the green. Unfortunately, I was on the front of the green, and the pin was on the back. I three-putted, which was disappointing because I had…
  • … shot a par on the par 4 before that, one-putting after an excellent chip from the fringe with my A wedge.

OK, that’s all the good news, except that I enjoyed the company (my Dad and my middle daughter) and the weather. (Speaking of daughters, my youngest is on the road up to Pennsylvania, so my heart is in my throat, while my oldest is still waiting for those twins to be born. If they don’t come on their own this week, they’ll induce. My sons I haven’t heard from or seen today; I’d best check on them.)

And that’s my full report; I’m not going to tell you about the bad shots. Looking to the new year, I think it best to stress the good ones, to cling to their memory so we have the hope to get out there again.

May all your shots be good ones in the coming year.

Now I know THAT’S not cricket

Pakistan_imran_khan_wart

Sure, some in this country may be able to make excuses for Pervez Musharraf’s behavior lately, but I know the guy’s crossed some sort of line when he starts arresting cricket players he doesn’t like:

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan,
Nov. 14 — Pakistani authorities arrested prominent cricket player and
opposition politician Imran Khan Wednesday as talks proceeded about a
possible alliance among opponents of the embattled Pakistani President
Pervez Musharraf.

Mr. Khan is the tall guy in the photo above — the one who looks like an aging jock.

Hyper-intense eye candy

Football2

        Way, way more intense than this…

Followers of this blog may or may not have picked up on the fact that I am not a football fan. In fact, it would not be unfair to call me an anti-fan. I mean, I’m glad everyone is such a good mood in Columbia these days because of the Gamecocks’ fortunes (bread and circuses do, indeed, have a practical point), but I’ve also seen them drunk, angry, and up close, so I take these good vibes with a full lick of salt.

But Saturday night, I found myself in a local pub actually watching college football — and being drawn into it. It was less a cultural phenomenon than a neurological one. It was the effect, previously unknown to me, of wide-screen HDTV.

I commented to my wife that someday, when our perpetual state of pecuniary strangulation has subsided somewhat (I’m a perpetual optimist), I’m gonna have me one of them. The idea, for me, is that I’ll then be able to get full the effect from all those DVDs I’ve been collecting in widescreen format (even though I realize they won’t fully use the features of the screen). That’s why I have a TV set, after all — to watch movies on.

And wonder of wonders, she didn’t contradict me! She actually spoke of the thing as though it were a possibility, wondering where it might go in the house. She was thinking along the lines of the same location as my hypothetical pool table. I suggested it would be hard to fully extend a LaZboy with a pool table in the way, but I did it gently, so as not to break the spell.

I think she was, at least to a slight extent, in the grip of the same thing that grapped me — the extreme, deep intensity of those hypersharp colors dancing around on the screen. I actually got, sort of, in a way, caught up in the games on the screen.

Looking at one of the two giant screens, I pointed out that everybody seemed to have on makeup. She said they DID have on makeup. Well, yeah, the sportscasters in the studio had on makeup — I imagined I could see each grain of powder caked onto their base — but even the fans in the stands seemed to have on makeup. I think it was just that every feature on their faces was so ridiculously clear and sharp, that it was as though they were artificially accented.

But then, I looked over at the other screen, and everybody looked just as intensely clear and sharp, but they didn’t seem to have on makeup. They looked explosively natural. I then realized that there was a tiny flaw in the color tuning of the first one, imposing a slight bronzing effect on European skin tones, suggestive of makeup. But it looked so good anyway that if I hadn’t had the other screen to compare it to, I would have said the color was beyond perfect.

Yeah, I know "beyond perfect" is an oxymoron, but what do you say about colors and shapes that impress themselves on your brain in a way that goes beyond colors and shapes as they are commonly understood. It’s like those old detergent commercials from when they first started adding phosphorus or whatever to the powder, and the ads said "whiter than white." These uniforms on these players were redder than red and bluer than blue and turquoiser that turquoise.

At one point, we encountered some folks we knew — friends of one of our daughters. And as my wife was speaking to them and I was looking over her shoulder trying to listen, it hit me that their faces were so dimly lit, so flat in their coloring, that my eyes sort of slid off of them, with little to grab onto.

My senses had become jaded that quickly. We had been there less than an hour, and the intensity of color had already made real people and real life insufficiently stimulating. I was appropriately embarrassed, ashamed and appalled at this realization. Time to leave.

Sirens_2
But it occurred to me leaving that if I had one of those things at home, I might not just watch movies on it. I might even watch football. But don’t worry, I won’t let me or mine get corrupted or anything. I’ll get my men to stick beeswax into their ears and tie me to the mast before hitting the "power" button.

Football4

        … and way bluer than this.

What it WAS, was a warning…

Survival would be impossible in this doggy-dog world without friends to give us a heads-up when danger approaches. Here’s one I got today:

I have eight tickets for
this Saturday’s football game –  and we are making them available for members
of Senior Staff to purchase if any of you are interested.
 
First come, first served. 
Email me back.  The tickets are $35 each. 
 
Thanks.
 
Kathy

Of course, as a veteran of 20 years of this craziness, I knew just what to do. I immediately scribbled,

(note to self: Don’t try to come in to work this
Saturday)

Without such an early-warning system, things could get ugly

A Chicago Idyll

Chicago

T
he Plan was for me to be back in South Carolina Sunday night. It didn’t work out because of a little time-travel anomaly: My flight out of Pennsylvania last night got delayed, and delayed again, until it wasn’t even leaving until AFTER my connecting flight at Dulles would leave.

So I stayed over a night, and ended up going to Chicago (cue overdub, w/voice reading Sandburg poem). Which means I got to play this game:

Mike Fitts answers his phone; I say, "Hey, could I speak to Mr. Rooney? This is Ferris Bueller. I’m sitting in a bar in Chicago watching the Cubs’ season opener." Which was true. Unfortunately, when I told him the score was nothing to nothing, he failed to say, "Who’s winning?" so that I could say, "The Bears." Other than that, it was perfect.

Since MIke’s a Cubs fan, it pleased me to tell him that so far, they were having a perfect season. OfDa_bar
course, it was the first inning. Before there were three outs, the Reds would score two, prompting the crusty guy next to me (I think he was some kind of cousin to Slats Grobnik) to laugh and say, "The Cubs not being behind only lasted about five minutes."

A few minutes later, I left to go check on my flight, saying I hoped the rest of the season goes better. The Grobnik guy laughed again and said, "Thanks, but I don’t really care." He was more interested in insisting to the barmaid that since this was Monday, it was supposed to be bean soup for lunch, not lentil. She said she ran out of beans. So he said he’d take the lentil, with less levity than he employed in accepting the fate of the Cubbies.

At that moment, I was supposed to be in Augusta at the Masters practice round. I had never been before, and was only going this time because my brother-in-law from Memphis couldn’t use his tickets. But thank to the airline, I missed that. So I got what enjoyment I could out of my little unplanned Ferris moment.

All of this helped me appreciate the editorial I read in the Trib I had just bought — coincidentally on a fateful day. Meanwhile, guess what else is up for sale in the City of Big Shoulders?

What’s really important

You want me to tell you what’s really important? Do you? Are you sure?

The other day, I posted a quick ditty about the NCAA basketball tournament. It was as much to enhance my own enjoyment as anything else — a form of sports Viagra, if you will. In the past, I’ve really enjoyed the tourney IF I had a bet in a pool. Because I had staked something, even a dollar, on the outcome, I cared, and got involved with the excitement as a spectator. It was fun. It almost made me feel like a normal person — taking interest for a change in both sports and television, at the same time.

But I had missed the deadline for any pools, so I filled out my bracket anyway and posted it, thinking that would be a good hook for me. It didn’t really work, possibly because my son got married over the weekend, so I was even busier than usual — a LOT busier. (And it was a blessed time with family and friends, one of the best I can remember. Much better than basketball.)

Anyway, on a whim, I did a video of my bracket and posted it on YouTube, meaning to link to it from the blog post. But I thought that just too stupid and obsessive for words, so I just went with the still photo.

It’s hard to find a dumber or more boring video than my out-of-focus panning over my poorly-considered picks for the NCAA. And yet, even though I didn’t promote it in any way, 58 people have called it up to watch it.

Sure, that’s not many by YouTube standards, but compare it to 59 views of my video of Lindsey Graham talking about the importance of energy independence — which, in my book, is greater than the importance of what an editorial page editor thinks about who will make it to the Final Four.

And it’s not just that people ignore the videos I push. They just watch what interests them. My first video on Grady Patterson, which I also promoted, has been watched 826 times.

Anyway, now that I know what is important to the viewing public, here is some truly riveting cinema on my basketball picks:

Too late — but here’s my bracket

Brackets_warthen

W
ell, I missed the deadline for getting in my bracket — both to the McCain site and the, uh, less licit arrangement in which I was asked to join — by a few minutes. I have no excuse. I was busy working, which is, of course, no excuse.

But I went ahead and filled it out anyway, so that you can see, once again, how lousy I am at prognostication.

Oh, and if you’re worried that I’m cheating even the slightest bit, I can assure you without fear of any credible contradiction that there is no possibility of that. I haven’t the slightest idea how the first games are going, or even which ones are the first ones. I just raced through the form, looking at the names and the seeds, and writing down winners.

If you doubt me, you don’t understand the extent to which I do not follow sports. I’ll tune in to the league playoffs and World Series as long as the Braves are in the running, and I will pay some attention to the NCAA IF I have filled out a bracket and IF my teams are still in it — which I won’t even investigate until the first games have been played.

I could have turned my bracket in tomorrow to the ool-pay, and nobody’s money would have been in danger. Unfortunately, I don’t have that kind of pull with the local mob.

Talk about your “March Madness”

We know where John McCain stands on the war, on abortion, yadda-yadda, but can he pick a winner? More to the point, can you do any better?

Gamecock fans may not have a dog — or chicken — in this fight, but they can test their roundball wisdomMccaingrimace
against that of the guy who’s been sewing up all the GOP establishment support in our state.

I got a release about brackets from the McCain campaign today. I had ignored the annual solicitation to kick in half a sawbuck on a pool, but this tempts me. I know even less about college basketball than some of my critics think I know about public policy, but can my boy John do better?

If you want to join in, you’ll have to get up some info to his campaign so it can pepper you with e-mails — yes, Virginia, this is about the crass business of building a mailing list, so keep your hand on your wallet — but I sort of want to know what the McCainiacs are sending out to supporters anyway. Win-win for me. How about you?

Ricky Bobby reconsidered

Nights_3_1
H
aving been warned away from "Talladega Nights," and having dutifully passed on the warning to you, I feel duty-bound to pass on any new evidence I encounter to the contrary.

I was sitting in a waiting room this morning, and had just heard via whatever "news" program was on the tube that always seems to be on in such places that the saga of Ricky Bobby had been the big money-maker over the weekend. This caused me to feel very superior to all those folks who had been duped into wasting their hard-earned means on something that I knew better than to go see.

Farrell1_1Then I found, among all the magazines that I would never read (with titles like "Self," which I suppose is some sort of libertarian think tank journal), a copy of the Sporting News . In it was a "My Turn" column under the name of the fictional Mr. Bobby himself, under a picture of Will Farrell in his NASCAR outfit.

And it was funny, in a snickering sort of eighth-grade locker room kind of way — which means it was wittier than most of the comedies Hollywood turns out these days. If whoever actually wrote this had anything to do with writing the picture, maybe it’s better than I had heard.

And if they didn’t get this guy to write it, why not?

Talladega

It’s even gotten to ME

How exciting is tomorrow’s matchup between the Gamecocks and the Tigers? This exciting: Even I am caught up in it. Kinda. Sorta.

I am just about the last person you would ever call a football fan. Baseball, yes. Sometimes even basketball. But mostly, my interest in sports extends only to those that I can play, such as golf and tennis. And I have little interest in watching other people play those. If I watch a tennis match on television for five minutes, I want to turn off the tube and get out there myself. (Meaning that I’m either more of a doer than a watcher — which is doubtful, given my love for reading and watching movies — or I’m just a self-centered cuss.)

Anyway, I’ve been sufficiently caught up in the contact high of excitement about the Gamecocks — something that started about the time of the win over Tennessee, I believe — that I actually watchedSpurrier part of last week’s game on the tube. And enjoyed it.

More than that, I actually read one of the advance stories about tomorrow’s big game in the paper this past week. Not a people feature or anything like that, but this story about a real football-geek facet of the game, built around stats. I started reading just out of curiosity, wondering what a "red zone" was (and unlike many such stories, geared only to the cognoscenti, it actually told me, once I got to the jump page), and then got caught up in the fact that it seemed Steve Spurrier’s approach to football was much like my approach to life (or what I like to think is my approach to life): Never give up, and never settle. He doesn’t go for the field goal when there’s a chance for a touchdown. Neither would I. Of course, I would never punt, either — but then, I tend to take things to obsessive extremes.

So, having done the required reading and whipped myself into an appropriate state of anticipation, I’m all set for the big game. And if I had ESPN2 on my TV at home, I’d watch it. I really would.

But lacking that, I’ll have to settle for the radio. If it’s on the radio. I assume it will be.

Anyway: Go, ‘Cocks.

Brad’s Baseball Post-Game Show

This is a follow-up posting to address some of the comments (particularly some of those in the latter half of the string) on my baseball column Sunday.

Lee, Brent, Nathan — calm those itchy, libertarian trigger-fingers. There’s no target here to shoot at.

Read the column again. The only governmental entity involved is USC. USC is going to build a ballpark one way or the other, no matter what I say or what anyone else does. And before your hands start twitching toward your anti-tax guns, remember that the USC athletics department supports itself financially.

The issue here is whether the Gamecocks will get to play in a better ballpark in a better location. That can only happen, as I clearly stated in the column, if a private partner comes along — one that sees a way to put together a deal that benefits both USC and the investors.

Will the city need to be involved at some point? Sure. It is the source for key infrastructure, not to mention zoning and other issues. And if the city kicks in a little something — land, or a break on infrastructure costs — fine.

But — whoa, I see you going for your guns again. Hold on, pardners! I need to make two quick points that ought to settle you down a bit.

  • The first is that any material involvement by the city should be minimal. You’re probably forgetting that this editorial board rejected a plan for a dual-use ballpark put forward by the city because it had too much financial involvement on the part of the city — and therefore too much exposure of city taxpayers to cost and risk. (The mayor is still ticked because we complain about not having minor-league baseball, yet we didn’t go for his deal.) What we liked was the later deal that was offered by private investors, which had minimal city involvement. We tend to be guided by what we call the "Publix Standard." We believe it appropriate for the city to put forth the kind of incentive it did to get a supermarket downtown, as that was key to so many other goals for the city — goals that should eventually dramatically expand the tax base within the city, and more than pay today’s taxpayers back. The kind of deal we oppose is on such as the city’s awful plan to own and run a hotel. And we don’t want them essentially owning a baseball team, either.
  • Second point — The City Council’s politics being what they are, it may or may not be possible to get so much as a dime out of it. The mayor has been burned enough he seems to have little appetite for making a proposal. The council, which seems to be generally ticked at the mayor lately (perhaps over the city government restructuring panel that he convinced it to appoint?), seems inclined to say no to anything he does suggest. The city right now is a huge question mark, and whether it could participate at all will depend upon just how attractive a deal is presented to it.

The University and private partners will drive whatever happens, if anything does happen. And I surely hope it does.