Results mystify in the two runoffs worth watching

I was way tired last night after going to Charleston and back and then swinging by a couple of watch parties, so no posting about runoff results.

But then, I didn’t have much to say. There was nothing to say about Nikki Haley because we knew she was going to win. Even the historic news of Tim Scott becoming the first black Republican nominated to Congress from SC since Reconstruction was anticlimactic; we had fully expected him to win big as well.

The suspense was with the lawyers — in the GOP attorney general’s race on the statewide level and Democratic solicitor’s race locally. And the results on both was disappointing.

Leighton Lord was clearly the stronger candidate for attorney general. Alan Wilson is a fine young man (and his wife is a friend from church and from the news biz), but come on — he’s been a lawyer 7 years. I’ve got a kid who’s been a lawyer almost exactly that long. Lord was the managing partner of a large law firm, a man at the peak of his career, admitted to practice before the Supreme Court, and so on and so forth. There just was no contest. If you were a rational employer choosing between these two applicants for such a senior position as attorney general, it wouldn’t take you more than a couple of seconds to choose Lord.

John Meadors was just as clearly better-qualified to be solicitor, something he has amply demonstrated over the course of 23 years of able service as a prosecutor. Yes, Dan Johnson had such experience too, but less of it. I see that Rep. James Smith had endorsed him. I’m having lunch with James tomorrow and maybe he can explain it. But with the endorsements Meadors had, including that of the third candidate in the primary, plus the fact that his team included Joey Opperman, who helped run such an effective runoff campaign for Steve Benjamin, made me think he’d win this one. (Plus, he advertised on this blog, which is usually a clincher.) But he didn’t.

After the Alvin Greene debacle, my faith in democracy has been a bit shaken. While these two instances are nowhere near as bad as that case — not within light years of it — I’m struck again at how whimsical election results can sometimes be. And this year, seemingly, more than most. Yeah, I know about the narrative of “less experience is better” this year, but that is so irrational, so positively childish, that I look for better reasons for the voters to have for the decisions that they make. I wonder: Was Leighton Lord too aristocratic, too “born to rule” seeming for an electorate in the hunt for the common touch (which is related to “experience is bad,” but not quite the same)? If so, why go with the son of a congressman? Was Meadors’ loss as simple as “the black guy won” (even though Meadors had plenty of visible black support)? Let’s hope not.

Anyway, at this point the only thing to do is congratulate Dan Johnson and hope he’ll be a great solicitor — since solicitor he will be, with no GOP opposition. And to give Alan Wilson a more conditional congratulations, and begin to focus on the contest to come in the fall against Democrat Matthew Richardson.

What I was doing all day today

"You're either on the bus or off the bus," said Kesey. I was definitely on the bus.

Just so you know I WAS posting on Twitter as I said I would while traveling with Ike McLeese and the Chamber gang to Charleston today, here are my Tweets — or most of them (some were replies to others that would make no sense out of context):

Am on a charabanc trip to Charleston w/ Ike & the gang from the Chamber. A Magical Mystery Tour, if you will — minus the acid.
about 9 hours ago via UberTwitter
End of “Shutter Island” explained some things, but wasn’t as credible as the original “reality.” They did all that for one patient. Right…
about 9 hours ago via UberTwitter
How could anyone seriously oppose bringing F35s to Beaufort Marine Air Station? It would be awesome. Semper Fi… http://tinyurl.com/27kd2hn
about 9 hours ago via UberTwitter
Prediction: Meadors will win solicitor. 1 of several reasons: Benjamin veteran Joey Opperman is on his team. Joey knows how to win a runoff.
about 8 hours ago via UberTwitter
And not only do I think John Meadors WILL win today, he SHOULD win. He’s the truly qualified candidate for solicitor.
about 8 hours ago via UberTwitter
Just picked up some stragglers in Charleston. Hey, you’re either on the bus or you’re off the bus. That’s what Kesey said, and it’s so true.
about 8 hours ago via UberTwitter
Col. Angelo Perri is on the bus with us today. Good to see the colonel, a longtime letter-writer when I was at the paper…
about 7 hours ago via UberTwitter
SC Ports Authority pinning future hopes, in part, on “reefer overweight container pilot program.” Far out…
about 7 hours ago via UberTwitter
Have you noticed how, increasingly, GOP in SC is only offering choice between the Jake Knotts wing or the Sanford wing? What happened here?
about 6 hours ago via UberTwitter
I’m in the middle of Charleston harbor on a tugboat with a bunch of fellow lubbers. Head has paper sign on it saying “rest room.” For us.
about 4 hours ago via UberTwitter
Enjoying a cold Bud on the way back from Charleston. Like I said, you’re either on the bus or you’re off the bus…
about 3 hours ago via UberTwitter
Wow. Look at the money ol’ Jerry Brown’s up against in California… RT @JerryBrown2010: Look at this photo – http://bit.ly/dDpNPn
about 3 hours ago via UberTwitter
JFK had the Cold War; he’s got this… RT @PoliticalTicker: Clinton pledges to defend gay rights at home and abroad http://bit.ly/btSokW
about 3 hours ago via UberTwitter
I say no. What do y’all say? RT @nytimes: Should the ‘Runaway General’ Be Fired? http://nyti.ms/9lbv3t
about 3 hours ago via UberTwitter
Actually, maybe he should go. Insubordination is insubordination. RT @nytimes: Should the ‘Runaway General’ Be Fired? http://nyti.ms/9lbv3t
about 3 hours ago via UberTwitter
RT @benpolitico: Great history of reprimands for “contemptuous” military speech http://is.gd/cZtiU (cont) http://tl.gd/2292h0
about 3 hours ago via UberTwitter
I’d JUST sat down when the land line rang (always a bad sign); it was DeMint wanting me to join in his virtual “town hall.” Is he kidding?
6 minutes ago via UberTwitter

Am on a charabanc trip to Charleston w/ Ike & the gang from the Chamber. A Magical Mystery Tour, if you will — minus the acid.about 9 hours ago via UberTwitter
End of “Shutter Island” explained some things, but wasn’t as credible as the original “reality.” They did all that for one patient. Right…about 9 hours ago via UberTwitter
How could anyone seriously oppose bringing F35s to Beaufort Marine Air Station? It would be awesome. Semper Fi… http://tinyurl.com/27kd2hnabout 9 hours ago via UberTwitter
Prediction: Meadors will win solicitor. 1 of several reasons: Benjamin veteran Joey Opperman is on his team. Joey knows how to win a runoff.about 8 hours ago via UberTwitter
And not only do I think John Meadors WILL win today, he SHOULD win. He’s the truly qualified candidate for solicitor.about 8 hours ago via UberTwitter
Just picked up some stragglers in Charleston. Hey, you’re either on the bus or you’re off the bus. That’s what Kesey said, and it’s so true.about 8 hours ago via UberTwitter
Col. Angelo Perri is on the bus with us today. Good to see the colonel, a longtime letter-writer when I was at the paper…about 7 hours ago via UberTwitter
SC Ports Authority pinning future hopes, in part, on “reefer overweight container pilot program.” Far out…about 7 hours ago via UberTwitter
Have you noticed how, increasingly, GOP in SC is only offering choice between the Jake Knotts wing or the Sanford wing? What happened here?about 6 hours ago via UberTwitter
I’m in the middle of Charleston harbor on a tugboat with a bunch of fellow lubbers. Head has paper sign on it saying “rest room.” For us.about 4 hours ago via UberTwitter
Enjoying a cold Bud on the way back from Charleston. Like I said, you’re either on the bus or you’re off the bus…about 3 hours ago via UberTwitter
Wow. Look at the money ol’ Jerry Brown’s up against in California… RT @JerryBrown2010: Look at this photo – http://bit.ly/dDpNPnabout 3 hours ago via UberTwitter
JFK had the Cold War; he’s got this… RT @PoliticalTicker: Clinton pledges to defend gay rights at home and abroad http://bit.ly/btSokWabout 3 hours ago via UberTwitter
I say no. What do y’all say? RT @nytimes: Should the ‘Runaway General’ Be Fired? http://nyti.ms/9lbv3tabout 3 hours ago via UberTwitter
Actually, maybe he should go. Insubordination is insubordination. RT @nytimes: Should the ‘Runaway General’ Be Fired? http://nyti.ms/9lbv3tabout 3 hours ago via UberTwitter
RT @benpolitico: Great history of reprimands for “contemptuous” military speech http://is.gd/cZtiU (cont) http://tl.gd/2292h0about 3 hours ago via UberTwitter
I’d JUST sat down when the land line rang (always a bad sign); it was DeMint wanting me to join in his virtual “town hall.” Is he kidding?6 minutes ago via UberTwitter

Now, I’m going to run out and drop by a couple of election night watch parties. I may or may not post again tonight. It’s been a long day.

Follow me on Twitter today

Today, I’m traveling with Ike McLeese and others with the Cola Chamber of Commerce to tour the Port of Charleston.

Call it a fact-finding mission. We’re on the hunt for facts, and when we find any we’ll club ’em senseless and skin ’em.

Blogging via Blackberry is tedious, so I’ll be posting on Twitter instead whenever possible. The address: http://twitter.com/BradWarthen

If I Tweet anything that interests you, please comment here.

In the meantime, here are a couple of things to think about on this runoff day:

— How many more dribs and drabs of previously undisclosed facts about the “transparent” Nikki Haley will come out? And I really hate to mention this, but will her decision NOT to release those e-mails from her public account really stand for four months?
— What will we think when we learn who “South Carolina Truth Squad” is? I regret that this is distracting from fact that Lord truly is more qualified. Nothing against Alan, but he’s only been a lawyer 7 years…

“Truth Squad,” whoever they are, win in court

An update — early this evening I got an e-mail from “South Carolina Truth Squad” attorney Todd Kincannon (last seen sponsoring “Pub Politics”), saying “We won” in reference to his clients’ case in the state Supreme Court.

But not having been there, I didn’t really have enough to write a post based on that. Now Jack Kuenzie over at WIS has filed this report:

COLUMBIA, SC (WIS) – The Republican runoff race for attorney general continues to get hotter as an attack ad made by a third party sparked a state Supreme Court hearing on Monday.
An attorney for candidate Alan Wilson argued before the state Supreme Court over the ethics of a critical campaign ad paid for by a group called the “South Carolina Truth Squad.”…
But Truth Squad attorney Todd Kincannon filed an appeal, and the dispute landed late Monday afternoon in front of three members of the State Supreme Court.
“This is true speech,” said Kincannon. “This is political speech. It is the highest form of speech. It is the most protected form of speech and that is a point that has been lost, I believe.”…
Monday evening, the Supreme Court sided with the Truth Squad and granted the stay of the restraining order. The ad continues to air.
But who is the Truth Squad? Wilson’s opponent, Leighton Lord, denies any connection with the ad. But Monday’s hearing indicated some if not all of the money, $90,000, came from a 22-year-old assistant to Kincannon.Well, we still don’t know who they are, but their ads against Alan Wilson will keep on airing as we head into tomorrow’s runoff.
We still don’t know who they are, but apparently their ad will keep airing against Alan Wilson as we head into tomorrow’s runoff.

Hey, I’ll know this Linda Ketner person is serious if and when she seeks the UnParty nomination

I’ve had it pointed out to me a couple of times that Linda Ketner from down Charleston way is possibly going to run as an independent against the formidable, ever-ambitious Jim DeMint and the undefeated Democratic champion Alvin Greene:

As if the U.S. Senate race in South Carolina wasn’t surprising enough, supporters of Linda Ketner — the Democratic candidate who put up a tough fight for Congress two years ago — are launching a last-minute drive to add her to the ballot.
And the petition to add the Charleston businesswoman and philanthropist as an independent candidate is circulating rapidly through Facebook and other social media.
Ketner, meanwhile, is keeping mum. Doug Warner, the finance director for her unsuccessful 2008 bid for Henry Brown’s 1st District congressional seat, said he spoke with her Tuesday before he and about eight other organizers launched the petition. He asked her to give the petition a chance to show bipartisan, grass-roots support, then make a decision on whether to run, Warner said.
‘I know that she is thinking about it,’ he said.

But I ask you, how can I take her seriously as a candidate when she hasn’t even approached the UnParty to seek its endorsement? I mean, really. Let’s keep a sense of perspective here, people.

Two happy customers of bradwarthen.com

Steve Benjamin and Seth Rose before Columbia Rotary Club meeting.

Steve Benjamin and Seth Rose before the Columbia Rotary Club meeting.

A good time was had by all at the Columbia Rotary Club today.

First, I got to sit with the lovely Shop Tart, whom our own Kathryn Fenner introduced to the Club as the authoress of her “second favorite blog.” I’m sure the Tart was suitably flattered.

Kathryn also introduced the main speaker, Columbia Mayor-Elect Steve Benjamin. Who, to beat a cliche within an inch of its undeserving life, actually needed no introduction, since he’s a member of our club.

Anyway, Steve said a lot of good stuff. And I was reminded of a reason I was glad he was elected: When asked about such delicate matters as whether he’s for a strong-mayor form or government or for the Midlands Housing Alliance’s effort, he comes right out and says he supports them. Which is a level of risk-taking we haven’t seen at City Hall. Here’s hoping the gamble pays off for us all.

Finally, quick, what do the recent electoral winners pictured above have in common, aside from the fact that they’re both members of my Rotary Club? That’s right: The thing that MAKES them both winners is that they both advertised on bradwarthen.com.

Hey, that’s my theory, and it fits the available facts…

Virtual Front Page, Monday, June 21, 2010

First, I should probably mention as this Monday winds down that I’m going to be out of pocket most, if not all, of tomorrow. I’ll probably post something after the polls close, but most of the day I’ll be away from my laptop.

Now, our top stories at this hour:

  1. Times Square Bomb Plotter Pleads Guilty in Terror Case (NYT) — Turns out this guy was actually guilty — or so he claims. Who’d’a thunk it?
  2. High Court Backs ‘Material Support’ Anti-Terror Law (NPR) — Meanwhile, the Supremes back a law meant to prevent any sort of aid to terrorists, even peripheral (sort of our domestic equivalent of flotillas of humanitarian aid to Hamas-run Gaza).
  3. With Scott, national GOP aims to break S.C. mold (WashPost) — How about that, a lede political story in The Washington Post about something positive regarding South Carolina? Well, positive unless you’re Strom Thurmond’s boy, who’s got to be ticked that the national party is picking a winner in the primary and it’s not him.
  4. Once-gentlemanly AG race headed for Supreme Court (thestate.com) — Stupid me. I went by Todd Kincannon’s office just before 5 to see him to follow up on our conversation this morning, forgetting that he would be in court — the Supreme Court — representing his client in this case. At least, I assume that’s where he was.
  5. Gulf of Mexico oil spill claims to be ‘paid quickly’ (BBC) — Note that’s from a British news source (which is why the hed says “Gulf of Mexico” instead of just “Gulf.” We’ll see, won’t we?
  6. B&N Cuts Price on Nook; Amazon Responds (WSJ) — Couple more cuts like these, and I might actually sorta kinda begin to consider starting to think about getting me one of these gadgets.

Dems say 6 GOP candidates not legit

Just got this from the state Democratic Party:

Up to Six Republican Candidates Break Financial Disclosure Law, Ineligible for Ballot
Republican Candidates Hiding Financial Information From Public, Party Bosses Fighting to Cover Track

COLUMBIA- As many as six statewide Republican candidates are ineligible to be on the ballot in both Tuesday’s runoff and the November general election, said South Carolina Democratic Party Chair Carol Fowler on Monday. South Carolina law dictates that candidates maintain financial transparency by filing Statements of Economic Interest by March 30, and grants a grace period of five days.  At the end of that grace period, candidates who have failed to comply with the law are barred from appearing on the primary ballot, or, in the event that they do appear, are barred from certification to appear on the November ballot.

Among the affected Republicans are Lt. Governor candidate Bill Connor, Attorney General candidate Alan Wilson, and incumbent Comptroller General Richard Eckstrom. Republican State Superintendent of Education candidates Elizabeth Moffly and Mick Zais and Adjutant General candidate Bob Livingston also failed to comply with the law within the time allowed.  The law reads very clearly, stating:

[SC ST SEC 8-13-1356]
(E) An officer authorized to receive declarations of candidacy and petitions for nominations under the provisions of Chapter 11 of Title 7 may not accept a declaration of candidacy or petition for nomination unless the declaration or petition is accompanied by a statement of economic interests. If the candidate’s name inadvertently appears on the ballot, the officer authorized to receive declarations of candidacy or petitions for nomination must not certify the candidate subsequent to the election.

[SC Code of Regulations 52-607]
B. A Statement of Economic Interests shall be filed as follows:
(2) A person who has not filed a Statement of Economic Interests in the same calendar year as his declaration for candidacy or petition for nomination shall complete the entire Statement of Economic Interests Form for the preceding calendar year and file the entire Statement with the official with whom the candidate files his declaration of candidacy or petition for nomination.


D. The Commission will review the Candidate’s Roster and Statements of Economic Interests, Information Pages and certify to the election official that the candidates have properly filed in which case the candidates’ names may appear on the election ballot. Any candidate who fails to file a Statement of Economic Interests shall not have his name appear on the election ballot. It is the responsibility of the official receiving the declaration of candidacy or petition for nomination to insure that each candidate has filed.

“The South Carolina Republican Party should never have allowed these individuals to be candidates, much less allowed four of them into runoff elections.  The South Carolina Republican Party doesn’t have the authority to decide who is eligible to appear on the ballot:  the law does.  Every Democratic candidate has been open and honest with the voters of South Carolina, while the Republican Party and their candidates have conducted themselves as though they are above the law,” said Fowler.  “This is just the latest insult to the taxpayers perpetrated by the South Carolina Republican Party; not only do they believe that Mrs. Haley is entitled to hide e-mails she sent on a taxpayer-funded computer and conceal thousands of dollars in income from a company with business before the state legislature, but they are actively covering up the failure of their candidates to comply with the law.  After eight years of failed policies from Mark Sanford, it’s time for new leadership and real transparency in South Carolina.”

Background
http://www.scdp.org//public/files/docs/background_chart.pdf

Paid for by the South Carolina Democratic Party – 1.800.841.1817 or www.scdp.org
and not authorized by any federal candidate or candidate’s committee.

But I’m sure Andre appreciates the mention

Nikki Haley has a party going on tonight. Where? Here:

Please join us tonight at 6:30 at the Wild Wings off Bauer Parkway in Irmoabout 1 hour ago via Twitter for Android

Shortly thereafter, she sent out this update:

Correction: Wilds Wings off BOWER Parkway at 6:30 this eveningabout 1 hour ago via Twitter for Android

Not that he made any kind of impression on her during the campaign or anything.

I’m not even going to mention the mistake on the name of the place…

The Greene family reunion T-shirt

Heard about these the other day, and reTweeted something about them. I even facetiously told my wife that’s what I wanted for Father’s Day.

But not really. My sense of enjoyment of the absurd doesn’t extend to enjoying the fact that SC politics is this dysfunctional. I think it’s too sad.

Republicans, however, sick of being (deservedly) the punch line for so long, are just enjoying the heck out of it. The above is from Shell Suber, via Facebook.

The video ad that Leighton Lord DID approve

Before writing that past post, I wrote to Leighton Lord to ask:

Leighton, does this video have anything to do with your campaign? If not, do you know who’s doing this?

He wrote back:

B, this is our spot, below, don’t who the Truth Squad is.  Not my campaign.

Above (not below) is the ad that he takes responsibility for. As you see, it starts out with a MUCH milder, less wacky Tea Party-ish version of the same sentiment Henry McMaster was going after in “Vultures.” Or perhaps the same IDEA, I should say. Lord is very much about reason, not emotion.

Beyond that, I think he makes his case well that he’s better prepared to be the state’s attorney general than Alan Wilson is. (And you’ll note he makes the same points as the mystery video, except for the “Daddy” part.) That’s not so say anything bad about Alan; I think he’s a good guy. But he doesn’t have Lord’s resume. And that business about Lord not being a prosecutor is a red herring, given the job they’re running for.

Who is the “SC Truth Squad?”

Here’s an interesting little last-minute puzzle.

See the above video. Note that it’s an attack video against Alan Wilson, yet not approved by his runoff opponent Leighton Lord. It’s from a group calling itself the “South Carolina Truth Squad.” It’s a South Carolina classic, having a PO Box but no physical office address, Web site or any other overt presence (you know, like Alvin Greene).

If you wrack your brain, and the Web, for an answer to the question, “Why does ‘South Carolina Truth Squad’ sound so familiar?” you’ll see that it’s the name of that pro-Obama group that was the vehicle for Dick Harpootlian and others to attack the Clintons back in January 2008. I wrote about it back here. Dave Barry wrote about it, tangentially, here.

So are Dick et al. getting their licks in early, assuming Wilson will be the nominee. I doubt it, while not discounting the possibility entirely.

Meanwhile, the Wilson campaign has put out this release:

EMERGENCY NOTIFICATION
FROM: Robert Bolchez, former Republican candidate for Attorney General
Over the past 24 hours. we have called as many Republicans as possible and left a recorded message about an incredible last minute dirty trick someone has launched during the final hours of the Attorney General’s race.
PLEASE MAKE ALL YOUR FRIENDS AWARE OF THIS:
A mysterious group calling itself the S.C. Truth Squad is spending over a hundred thousand dollars to pay for last minute TV ads attacking Alan Wilson.  And it’s important for Republican voters not to be deceived by these underhanded tactics.  I can assure you that those ads are either misleading or completely untrue
As you know, until last Tuesday I was a Republican candidate for Attorney General. Now that I’m no longer in the race, I have offered my full support to Alan Wilson.
Alan is now the ONLY prosecutor in the race.  He’s also a decorated combat veteran and he’s the only candidate who’s actually served as an Assistant Attorney General.  By far, Alan is best qualified for the job.
Again, please tell all your friends that the TV ads attacking Alan Wilson are NOT true.  In the race for attorney general, Alan is by far best qualified to protect our families.
I ask you to join me in supporting Alan in the runoff election tomorrow.  Thank you.
Sincerely,
Robert Bolchoz
One assumes Robert Bolchoz was involved, even though his name is misspelled in the “from” line.

Funny thing about all this mystery — the video’s not all that out of line. One can believe an actual campaign would claim it. Sure, it goes overboard to be unfair, such as when it says “The truth is, the only notable thing in Alan Wilson’s background is being a congressman’s son.” Actually, I think his being a combat veteran is notable, even though its relevance to the post he’s seeking is questionable.

In fact, the tone is no more negative than the tone in the ad below that Wilson actually posts on his Web site.

As for substance in these ads, such as it is? Well, I think Lord’s experience running a big law firm is more relevant and impressive than young Alan’s short time as a prosecutor. For what that’s worth. (And calling his Daddy “our conservative hero Joe Wilson” is for me the biggest turnoff in either ad.)

Want to see a REAL cigarette tax increase?

Just so you know what a real, honest-to-goodness, serious cigarette tax increase looks like, check this out:

Cigarette taxes in New York would jump by $1.60 a pack under a tentative deal reached between Gov. David A. Paterson and legislative leaders, which would give New York the nation’s highest state cigarette taxes.

The proposal, which officials said Mr. Paterson would include in an emergency budget bill due for a vote on Monday, would also raise wholesale taxes on other tobacco products like chewing tobacco, bringing the tax on those products closer in line with those of cigarettes.

In New York City, which levies steep taxes of its own on tobacco products, a pack of cigarettes would come with a tax of $5.85, making it the nation’s first city to break $5, antismoking advocates said. That would bring the overall cost of a pack of premium cigarettes above $10 in many stores in the city.

And we’ve been patting ourselves on the backs about the one big achievement of the 2010 legislative session — a whopping 50-cent increase from our lowest-in-the-nation 7-cent tax, which we had to wait about a decade for.

That means our TOTAL state cigarette tax, after our increase, is just over ONE-THIRD of the INCREASE that New York just did in one little hop. And the tax on a pack of cigarettes in New York City is MORE THAN TEN TIMES the new tax here in SC.

Yeah, I know; you have to crawl before you can walk. But still.

Mind you, I can’t really point to anything else our lawmakers tried to do this year to catch us up to the rest of the country in any regard. We just have this one tiny bit of progress. I was suitably proud of us for it. At least it meant we had done ONE of the things that was on my list of “South Carolina’s unfinished business” I wrote about when I left the paper. Sure, it was one of the two really easy ones I tacked onto the end of the column, as suggestions for something to warm up on before we really got down to work. But it was the first actual, measurable progress I had seen on anything in years — probably since Mark Sanford became governor.

So New York goes and makes our accomplishment look ridiculous. This is humiliating.

You suppose they did it on purpose? Those Yankees do like to mock us

Virtual Front Page, Friday, June 18, 2010

I just went two days without one of these to see if y’all would miss one. Nobody said anything. So what? I’m going to do this one anyway:

  1. South Carolina’s unemployment rate drops to 11% (CRBT) — So that’s like, what? The fourth month in a row it’s dropped? And most states posted gains in jobs. So what’s our narrative here? The stimulus worked? Mark Sanford’s brilliant performance as an economic developer is paying off? It will be interesting to see what Nikki Haley and Vincent Sheheen have to say about how to build on this.
  2. BP Moves Hayward to Lesser Role in Spill Response (NYT) — Looks like he’s got his life back, huh? I feel so much better. Meanwhile, the Brits are ticked because Congress was so beastly to him.
  3. Hopes dim of reaching trapped Colombia miners (BBC) — Never ceases to fascinate me how I have to check with British media to know what’s happening in the Americas.
  4. U.S. Rallies For 2-2 Draw Vs. Slovenia (NPR) — Hey, I’m just putting it here because the rest of the world thinks the World Cup is such a big deal.
  5. Drug for Sexual Desire Disorder Rejected by Panel (NYT) — Guess we’ll have to fall back on the traditional remedy, booze. I wonder what this is going to do to Spanish Fly futures?
  6. Lennon’s A Day in the Life lyrics sell for $1.2m (BBC) — “I read the news today, oh boy… nobody was really sure if the bidder’d lost his mind…”

That was an unfortunate picture of Nikki today

I’m talking about the one in the paper today.

Made her face look fat. Don’t you think? Nikki does NOT look like that.

In fact, if anything, she’s too skinny. She looks great in photos because the camera adds 10 pounds, and she could use 10 pounds. In person, I always worry about her; she just looks too thin.

But this camera must have been turned up to 30 pounds. This is not our Nikki.

Just wanted to let y’all know, I will stick up for Nikki when the situation calls for it — I mean, she’s a lady and all — even though the idea of her being governor appalls me.

Vic Rawl throws in the towel

This just in from Vic Rawl:

STATEMENT FROM VIC RAWL
A few moments ago, I sent the following letter to my supporters:
Dear Friend:
The last ten days have been extraordinary.
But for me and Laura, it is the months before that are far more important. I cannot express our gratitude for your support during the campaign and in the days since the primary election.
We hold our heads high, and know that the friendship of people like you is far more important in life that the outcome of any election.
I wanted you to hear from me that we will not be appealing last night’s decision by the Democratic Executive Committee to reject our protest of the election results. My campaign for the United States Senate has ended.
The issues we raised about the lack of election integrity in South Carolina are real, and they are not going away unless people act. I assure you that I will continue to speak out about our frail, vulnerable and unverifiable election system in the months to come.
I also feel strongly that the Democratic Party needs major reform of the rules and procedures regarding ballot qualification, protests and many other areas. This is critical to strengthen the Party and make it broadly competitive in our state.
Let me also take a moment to thank our volunteers. They gave selflessly of their time and talent toward making our state better. I also deeply thank my staff, a talented and dedicated group of professionals who were champions both before and after June 8th.
Thank you again for your support – this race was for you.

The big BP coffee spill

Since a couple of you have brought this video to my attention, and since it is funny, and since a couple of others have pointed out in person to me that I’m really being a grouch today, I thought I’d share it with you in the interests of lightening the mood.

At the very least, it’s more entertaining than the show that Congress put on yesterday with the actual head of BP. Unfortunately, neither this nor that solves our huge problem…

But no, I’m NOT going to be all negative. Let’s enjoy this…

“We are not Confederates.” See, that was easy

Back on a previous post, Greg Jones said:

On a final note; do any of the German government buildings still fly the Nazi flag?
Just asking.

To which I gladly replied, No, they do NOT, Greg. The Germans decided to draw a line, to say going forward, “We are not Nazis.”

Unfortunately, South Carolina has not yet decided to declare to the world, “We are not Confederates.”

And therein lies the problem.

At this point, the “heritage” crowd will get apoplectic, and scream about how the Confederacy and the war it started is completely different from the Nazis and the war they started, with different causes, different motivations and different kinds of moral culpability.

But the BIGGEST way in which they are different is that the Germans are able to say, “We know our history and will never forget it. But we HAVE learned from it. And we can say unequivocally, that is not what we are about any more.”

And South Carolinians, who should be able to do the same, do not. In fact, the Republicans seeking to become our next governor deliberately, meekly submit themselves to, and do their best to pass, an ideological purity test administered by people who think the exact same conflict over the exact same issues continues today, and who are continuing the struggle.

“Stupid bloody cabaret”

That headline comes from John le Carre’s Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy. Bill Haydon, a character given to dry sarcasm among other vices, utters the words upon leaving a meeting in which there had been much posing and preening for show, but little point:

“Stupid bloody cabaret,” Bill remarked, waving vaguely at the mothers. “Percy’s getting more insufferable every day.”

That phrase entered my mind as I read in The Wall Street Journal about the ritual conducted in Congress yesterday when the boss of BP was called on the carpet:

Mr. Hayward stuck to his plan. He sat for hours on Thursday, alone at a witness table, parrying questions from indignant members of the House Energy and Commerce Committee in a deliberate monotone.

Over and over, he said he wasn’t involved in the decisions preceding the accident and declined to speculate on causes until investigations were complete.

Summoning executives of companies caught up in financial or legal trouble to receive televised scoldings is a ritual of U.S. politics. Detroit auto titans, Wall Street bankers, and the head of Japanese auto giant Toyota Motor Corp. have all done time in Congress’s dock as lawmakers looked for someone to blame for the calamities of the past two years.

Such proceedings are not designed to accomplish anything, beyond the public embarrassment of the guest of honor. Never mind that those subjected to such treatment so often richly deserve the treatment. The whole thing strikes me as inappropriate in a country devoted to the rule of law.

If we wish to prosecute, haul the guy into court. If we wish to make BP pay, make them cough up a huge amount of money. Which we had already done, and appropriately so. If we need to obtain information from them, this is hardly the forum for doing so. Quite the opposite, in fact. A fact-finding gathering would have the people there who could actually answer the question, and investigators better equipped to ask them than these politicoes.

This is about lawmakers preening before the cameras, exhibiting their righteous indignation to the folks back home. This is the modern equivalent of the public stocks, and the congressmen are the ones in the crowd who want to be seen as the first to heave a rotten tomato, or a dead cat, or a stone at the person thus restrained.

Mind you, I feel no pity for Mr. Howard. This is what he gets paid the big bucks for. What disturbs me is, what an inadequate way this is to deal with the problem. It makes my country’s system of addressing problems look tawdry and empty.

I’m probably going to displease my Democratic friends with this one, because as I read further down in the story, I see they were the main ones showing off their indignation. But that was just today. Some other day, with some other subject, it would be all about Republicans trying to humiliate someone they were angry with.

It’s the process that seems inconsistent with a rational way of dealing with this horrendous problem. And like so many things that I find objectionable in our society, this is about television. Remove the cameras, and this event wouldn’t be happening — or would be very different. Actually, I take that back. It’s not television per se. In an earlier era, they’d have been showing off for the newsreel cameras. It’s just that with television, constituents with nothing better to do can watch it in real time.

You doubt that it was pointless, beyond venting emotions? Then tell me — what effective action did the session lead to? What WAS the point? What has been done, as a result of that show?

You want me to tell you what the real-world consequence of that grilling was? BP’s stock went up, because its CEO “survived” the process. Really.

You know what I’d like to see? All these members of Congress in their chamber, seriously debating a real, sensible Energy Policy, one that helps us move beyond dependence on the BPs of the world. That would be useful. But I guess that’s just too hard.

The boycott will NEVER (and should not) get the flag down

On a previous post, there was an exchange between the two Michaels: Michael Rodgers, who believes passionately as I do that the Confederate flag should not be flying on our State House grounds, and “Michael P.,” who seems to disagree.

The exchange had to do with the NAACP’s boycott of South Carolina over the flag. Michael Rodgers had asserted (in his defense, as but one of five reasons, the other four being perfectly legitimate) that the boycott was a reason to take the flag down. With THAT, I had to respectfully disagree.

We MUST remove the flag from the grounds. But in order to accomplish it, we must first ignore the NAACP’s efforts to FORCE the state to do so, and get others to ignore it as well. It’s a necessary precondition to getting to the point that we do the right thing.

It is my firm belief that the absurd, ineffective NAACP boycott is one of the things keeping the flag up. It plays to the cranky white neo-Confederate’s sense of persecution. And it plays to the genetic predisposition of white South Carolinians (including those who could easily be persuaded to put the flag away otherwise) to never, EVER let anyone MAKE them do something.

I have that genetic predisposition, so I understand it. Allow me to explain: If flying the flag at the State House is the right thing to do, then NO amount of economic pressure should EVER induce us to take it down. Coercion should be resisted at every point along the line. If flying the flag is right, we could keep flying it even if the boycott were successful, even if it starved us.

The thing is, it is NOT right to fly the flag. But since the NAACP gets all the ink and has positioned itself in the mindless media (which is always all about a FIGHT rather than reason) as THE opposition to flying the flag, there is no way most white South Carolinians are going to go along with someone who is trying (however unsuccessfully) to HURT them into making them do its will. That fact, that the NAACP is doing its damnedest to try to hurt SC, obscures the wrongness of the flag for the white majority.

We’re talking about the white MAJORITY instead of the wacky neo-Confederate activists. The majority that can take the flag or leave it alone, that neither weeps for the Lost Cause nor sits up nights fretting about the social injustice of flying the flag in the faces of black people who are also citizens of our state.

The majority, in short, that needs to be won over. These folks don’t want to ally themselves necessarily with the people who play Confederate dress-up, but they don’t want to side with the people trying to hurt SC. And unfortunately, as long as the media continue to paint the issue as one off conflict between the extremes, as a mandatory choice between those options, the average person who just doesn’t want to spend time thinking about it wants to stay out of the whole thing, would prefer it not be brought up at all.

For those people — and we’re talking about at least a plurality of people in this state, defined as having the above-described attitude — there is an all-too-convenient default position: Embrace the “compromise” that in the minds of intellectually lazy people “settled” the issue.

And we’re never going to be able to deal with that problem as long as the NAACP continues to wage its farcical boycott. Unfortunately, I see little chance of the NAACP dropping it. It is an organization that, sadly, has become defined by conflict. Drop the conflict, and too many people in the group’s leadership would feel that they’d lost their raison d’etre.

So we have a HUGE challenge before us — changing the conversation so that it is NOT about those people on the two sides of that conflict caricature.

We need to move South Carolina to a more mature place. In fact, I’ve never seen removing the flag as the goal. I see the flag going away as a sure SIGN that the real goal has been achieved. And the goal is a South Carolina that has decided, in its own collective heart and mind, that it has outgrown such foolishness. That we are bright enough to understand that relics of history — particularly such painful history — belong in museums, and should not be given present life at the center of our public, common existence. And that we are one people, with common interests and respect for one another, having outgrown the desire to wave defiance in each other’s faces.

THAT’S the goal, growing up as a people. Once we do that, the flag will become a footnote of history.