Category Archives: South Carolina

Less than six degrees of Harry Dent

All right, I didn’t know Harry Dent personally. So I urge you to read the op-ed piece we ran today from Bob McAlister, who did. We’re considering other submissions about him now.

But this is South Carolina, and everybody in South Carolina touches everybody else. We don’t have to play "Six Degrees" around here, even with Kevin Bacon. We are usually no more than a degree or two away. That’s true even of someone like me who didn’t grow up here, except in the summers when I was with my grandparents in Bennettsville and Surfside. All you need is to have your roots here, and three-fourths of my family tree grows out of our poor soil (my father’s father’s people are from Maryland).

Harry Dent — the one who died last week, not the son — was my Dad’s fraternity brother at PC. In fact, in keeping with his pursuit of worldly superlatives in his early life, he was the president of the fraternity. My Dad wasn’t close to him, and even wondered how he ended up among the Pikes, since he wasn’t a jock. Dad was there on a tennis scholarship in the days when the Blue Hose were a tennis powerhouse, and most everybody in the fraternity played ball of some sort. (Dad informs me that his football-playing brothers were in the "smart" positions; the linemen belonged to Sigma Nu.)

But I had never heard of him when I left Hawaii for my one semester at USC in 1971. I first heard of Mr. Dent one day in Prof. Dolan’s world history class. A student had asked the prof during class whether a certain historical situation he was describing (I forget what) didn’t have an interesting parallel with the Nixon Administration. The prof had brushed the question aside. After class, the questioner went up to the prof and asked why he hadn’t answered the question. He said, "I’m not answering a question like that with Harry Dent’s kid sitting there in the class."

I don’t know which son that was because I don’t remember his first name. But after having him thus pointed out, I made the connection when it turned out he lived on the same floor of the Bates House — which was brand-spanking new that semester — with several friends of mine I referred to collectively as the Bates House Gang. (I lived in the honeycombs, with the hard core.)

Once after I came to work at the paper, Harry Dent came to see us about some worthy cause or other he was promoting, and I got to chat with him briefly. I can’t remember now whether he already knew of our connection (the one through my Dad) or not.

One more thing: Whenever his name has come up, Dad has always referred to him as "Harry Shuler" — first name and middle name. I asked him why the other day. He said he didn’t know why; he just always had.

I guess it’s kind of a South Carolina thing.

‘Historic Myrtle Beach’

One of the pitfalls of being attention-span-deprived (and also one of the blessings, since it makes life so much more entertaining), is that the smallest thing can cause me to miss entirely the "important" parts of a message or document or presentation or whatever. I’m always too busy digging the one little thing that grabbed my attention.

Today, when I read this from the S.C. Republican Party…

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE   CONTACT: ROB GODFREY
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 2, 2007

2008 South Carolina Republican Party Presidential Candidates Debate media credential request form released
COLUMBIA, S.C. – The South Carolina Republican Party today released the 2008 South Carolina Republican Party Presidential Candidates Debate media credential request form…
    “We are extremely excited to extend a warm South Carolina welcome to journalists from across the country and the world to our historic event,” said South Carolina Republican Party Chairman Katon Dawson.  “Last May, our debate attracted hundreds of members of the media worldwide, but this next debate will attract even more.  Journalists understand the significance of having a debate just nine days before our primary election, and they know the 2008 presidential election could be decided on our stage that night.”
    In August, the South Carolina Republican Party announced that it had partnered with FOX News Channel to present a live, nationally-televised Republican Party presidential candidates debate on Thursday, January 10, 2008, in historic Myrtle Beach, South Carolina.  The debate will be held at the Myrtle Beach Convention Center….

… the only thing I got out of it was "historic Myrtle Beach."

What an odd modifier to choose. "Historic Charleston," sure. "Historic Beaufort," certainly. Maybe even "historic Columbia," although that’s a stretch.

But Myrtle Beach? Historic? There are other modifiers I could think of, both complimentary and un-, but that one wouldn’t crowd out the others on the mad rush to the tip of my tongue.

And yet, when I think about it (which I can’t help doing, such is my curse and blessing), I realize that in terms of history that is truly relevant to my life, the moniker sort of works — if you think of "history" as the changes that come with passage through time.

Charleston is what it was when I lived there as a baby. "Historic," but in a static way — sort of frozen in time, like a museum exhibit. Yes, Joe Riley has done a lot to make it better, but a lot of what he’s done has been to revitalize what was once there — essentially, to make the museum livable, vibrant and dynamic.

But Myrtle Beach has been like America — a rowdy, hand-over-fist, unruly thing growing and changing like a weed and just as ugly, but always with an eye to what the people want right NOW. (And yes, the America I love is many other things as well, but this is a facet of America.)

I remember when there was the Pavilion amusement park and arcade, Chapin’s department store, and ONE hamburger joint, as far as what I took notice of…

It was the place kids growing up in South Carolina wanted to go, a la "Shag: The Movie." A generation before the time when that movie was set, the place we think of essentially didn’t exist. Then, it was the center of this youth culture, the one place in South Carolina that reflected the Southern California car culture of "American Graffiti." It was also a low-rent but picturesque resort of homey, idiosyncratic hotels and shacks and bungalows — a far more warm, inviting place than what it became after Hugo, with nine identical "houses" on stilts jammed together on a lot that previously would have held one battered low-slung getaway.

In the early 80s, the growth started to metastasize, the scrubby foliage that once surrounded beach homes giving way to condos by the thousand. And the equally scrubby stuff that gave the place its charm started disappearing. For me, the greatest blow came when the little family-oriented amusement park down in Surfside gave way to a high-rise Days Inn, but for most of us the ultimate crash didn’t hit until after the turn of the century, with the demolition of the Pavilion at the heart of the city itself.

It’s history that has certain visual styles to accompany each phase of my life, old pictures you can dig through like archaeologists  digging through strata of an abandoned aboriginal village.

So yeah, I guess "historic" works.

 

Joe Biden II: ‘I will win the South Carolina primary’

OK, in all fairness to the man, he did qualify the statement. He said, "If I come out of New Hampshire viable… I will win South Carolina."

This is a follow-up to the clip I posted a few minutes ago. The Broder and Rich columns referenced on the last post are actually not mentioned until this clip. Sorry about that. I have to edit things down to make them fit onto YouTube.

Anyway, this clip follows the other directly in time, only this one concentrates on how South Carolina figures into his plans.

Bob McAlister’s blog has gone dark, and I don’t feel so good myself

We’ve arrived at the time of the week when I peruse South Carolina blogs looking for something, anything, that is fresh, S.C.-flavored and printable for the blog rail we run down the right-hand side of the edit page on Mondays.

And the pickings are slim. In fact, I discovered to my horror that one of the most reliable bloggers out there — our own Bob McAlister, who would never have gotten into the game if not for us — is hanging up his guns.

As he puts it in his blog equivalent of a suicide note:

I’m outta here

September 24th, 2007

This blog is going dark (some would say it’s been in the dark since I started).

The reason: Too much to do, too little time to do it. My business,
thankfully, continues to thrive. Since I’m paying to send four
grandchildren to a private Christian school, I figure I’d be smart to
concentrate solely on it. I just don’t have the time or, more
accurately, will not take what limited time I have to do readers
justice.

When I succumbed to Cindi Scoppe’s proposal to start this blog more
than two years ago, I wrote that I hoped blogging did not take the
place of real news. So far it hasn’t, but blogging is becoming an
increasingly important part of the public information business. So much
so that bloggers are courted by presidential candidates almost as much
a real reporters. All of the mainstream media are getting into blogging
nowadays. I assume it’s their effort to connect with younger people who
don’t watch TV news or read newspapers.

But I still maintain bloggers are not journalists, at least not at
this point in the evolution of the industry. They should not have the
same rights as journalists (such as protecting confidential sources
from court proceedings). But many of them are breaking news and
offering insights that you don’t always get in the mainstream media.
The discipline no doubt is maturing and that’s good for news consumers.

Anyway, so much for my feeble contribution. I appreciate the way
Cindi, Brad and Kelly (The State’s blogging expert) have supported and
encouraged the other community bloggers and me. The editorial staff
does not get the credit it deserves for busting its collective butt 7
days a week to turn out a news product. But I never found them too busy
to answer some pretty dumb questions from yours truly. They’re great
people (even though I want to strangle them at times for not seeing the
world just as I see it).

As Dan “Yellow Dog Democrat” Rather would say, “Courage.”  Whatever the heck that meant.

But you know what? He’s far from the only one whose lights are no longer on. The others just haven’t had the decency to alert us to the fact.

I’ll do a follow-up post on that. Right now, I’ve got to get back to the weekly chore, which has just become harder.

Having an Obama mañana

Today I seem to be having an Obama mañana.

First, I run into Max, who tells me that on Saturday the campaign is going to try to knock on 50,000 doors in South Carolina. Every county is organized, hundreds of volunteers are ready in-state, and hundreds more are expected to come from elsewhere to help. Should be quite an impressive feat if they pull it off — and if any campaign can, it’s Obama’s.

Then I read this on the front page of The Wall Street Journal. It’s getting to where I’m as likely to run into the names of local folks I know in national publications as in The State. The theme of the story is that all politics is local — and in this case, "local" means Greenwood, S.C. Such local characters as Rep. Anne Parks and Obama spokesman Kevin Griffis are characters in the tale. Anyway, the piece is a good read if you can call it up. And if you can’t here’s an excerpt:

GREENWOOD, S.C. — When Barack Obama wants to get a campaign crowd really fired up, he tells the story of a whistle-stop a few months back in this out-of-the-way town.
    He was having a down day; the weather and his mood were both foul. And he had driven to Greenwood — "an hour and a half from anywhere" — to keep a promise to a state legislator. Just a handful of well-wishers were there to greet him.
    Suddenly, the Illinois senator heard a voice sing out from the back of the room: "Fired up! Ready to go!" It came from a tiny woman in a big-brimmed church hat. She repeated the chant. Before long, everybody joined in, and Mr. Obama himself was again feeling the spirit.
    "Here’s a lesson for you," he said while telling the Greenwood story at a rally in Carroll, Iowa, this month. "If you’re fired up and ready to go, we can change the world."
    But beyond Mr. Obama’s soapbox rhetoric about Greenwood is a more complicated story, of small-town politics, snubs and jealousies — and a reminder that even presidential campaigns can be very personal and very local. Mr. Obama’s appearance in Greenwood may have left him fired up, but it also left bruised feelings among local Democrats and left his campaign with a damage-control job that continues to this day…

Finally, I overhear somebody at another table at breakfast talking about Obama, and I find myself wondering if the guy is taking over South Carolina. But it’s just someone mentioning the candidate’s appearance at a couple of churches here in the Columbia Sunday, and I had already read about that.

Sanford’s latest money pitch

This was shared with me by a certain person who removed the name of the source who sent it to her, because she doesn’t trust me with such information.

This is an encouraging message, because the governor is actually advocating reform in this pitch, as opposed to what I got out of the previous one from Tom Davis, which emphasized the governor’s strange belief that government in South Carolina is overly blessed with resources.

This message, paired with the promise of Reform SC to disclose its sources of income, has calmed me down a tad on this subject, for now.

Anyway, here’s the message:

From: Mark Sanford [mailto:mark@sanfordforgovernor.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2007 3:09 PM
To: DELETED/crs
Subject: Reform SC Fundraiser with Governor Jeb Bush

I hope the weekend treated you well.

I am writing to ask for your help.

We are now three weeks out from our one fundraising push on behalf of Reform SC, and if you could help us I would appreciate it.

From a South Carolina perspective, this is really important because there is no way our government’s structure will change until enough people are talking at a grass roots level on the need for it. I have said to a number of friends that until someone is asking their cousin in Hampton why we are the only state in the country with a Budget and Control Board – and in turn they are talking to someone else about how that drives up the cost of our state government – change will be exceedingly tough. We have a fatally flawed governmental structure that costs all of us in a variety of ways and changing it is the lynchpin to changing many of our government’s outcomes.

So all this makes our current push toward October 16th very important, and indeed its why I would ask that you join in if this currently isn’t on your radar screen – and that you redouble your efforts if it is.

If you could scrape up the $500 an individual, $1000 a couple, to attend one of the events in Spartanburg, Columbia or Charleston, it would help very much – and I think you would be in for a treat. Jeb has a very unique vantage point on the need for reform in government.

If you can’t I would still ask that you help financially at some level and talk to friends about doing the same because a little help from a lot of friends adds up. There will be plenty of additional ways to help beyond that, but again this is our one big push in trying to fill the gas tank financially so that the important work of educating on reform can begin.

In either case we need to be getting checks in so we know how many people to expect and plan for on the 16th. So if you can help us please send any checks to Reform SC, P.O. Box 123, Columbia SC 29202.

Thank you for your consideration on this – I appreciate it.

Sincerely,

Mark

P.S.  If you are interested in one of the events and need further details, please let me know.

Adam (‘The Palmetto Scoop’) Fogle’s response

Fogleadam

Just received this response to my inquiries from Adam Fogle at "The Palmetto Scoop (that’s him pictured above with Georgia Gov. Sonny Perdue):"

Brad,
    When you emailed me asking me to identify myself, I was  happy to do so… nothing to hide.  As far as disclosures go, you and I are very similar.
    I started my blog on my own —  not on anyone’s payroll.  I do it because I enjoy it and it’s something I got into in Georgia on the website Peach Pundit (www.PeachPundit.com), which is run by RedState’s Erick Erickson. I love to write, I love politics, and I think I’m a pretty good blogger.
    How much do I make from my blog?  Like you: zippo (except a little revenue from ads).
    And like you, I also like John McCain.  No secret there.  I think he’s best prepared to be our commander-in-chief.  Earlier this year, I even volunteered to help out at a few events but never in a paid capacity.
    After I started my blog, I was hired by Rick Quinn as an account representative for Mail Marketing Strategies, a direct mail business in Columbia.
    I have continued my blog on my own.  It is not and has never been a part of my official duties.
    And my blog, unlike some others, has never and will never engage in anonymous character assassination.  Yes, Rick’s dad is a consultant to John McCain.  But no one pays me to blog.
    I will call you in about 30 mins. to follow up.

        – Adam Fogle, The Palmetto Scoop

Who does Number Two work for?

OK, excuse the tacky Austin Powers allusion in the headline there, but I’m on a quest…

You’ll remember (if you live in the S.C. Blogosphere) that The Palmetto Scoop recently claimed that the folks at The Shot are less than pure, having a business association with elements connected to the Romney campaign. I’d like to talk to Tim Cameron about that, but I don’t have a number for him. Let’s see how long it takes him to see this and e-mail me.

But for whom does Adam Fogle of The Palmetto Scoop work, if anyone? He apparently likes John McCain — and there’s nothing wrong with that — but is there more to it? Is there a more formal connection?

To take it a step further, are there some blogs out there that are more (or less) than what they seem? Are any of them fronts for campaigns, but don’t own up to it on their sites?

I’d like to find out, and report on it, here and maybe in a column. If any of y’all have insight into this, either post it here or, if you want to be sneaky about it, e-mail me.

Oh, and as far as disclosures: You know what you’re getting on this blog, because I tell you. Whom do I work for? The State. How much money do I make from my blog? Zippo. I like John McCain. And Joe Biden, and Barack Obama, and to some extent Sam Brownback and Mike Huckabee. There are others I don’t like so much. Do I speak for The State when I express these preferences? No. I liked McCain in 2000, too, but we endorsed Bush. I don’t always win these debates.

If you have any other questions for me, ask them. In the meantime, answer some for me if you can:

  • Which blogs are solidly in the pockets of which campaigns?
  • What is the relationship?
  • Is there money involved?
  • How do I get in touch with those responsible?

I’ll be pursuing this in the usual ways, but while I do so, I thought I’d test the theory that blog readers frequently know more about such things than blog writers do. Go ahead; make me proud of you.

McCain on the comeback trail

B.J. Boling sent out a release to call attention to this piece by Dan Hoover. Here’s B.J.’s release, here’s a link to the story, and here’s an excerpt:

    John McCain was midway through his "No Surrender" bus tour last Sunday when he entered territory both familiar and friendly, that of yet another military veterans’ group.
    The tour was named for his position on Iraq, one mirroring that of the Bush White House: No withdrawal, at least not in any numbers and not now.
    It also could have been named for his second Republican presidential run.
    The Arizona senator is hanging in there, something many thought unlikely after six months of disastrously low fundraising for a major candidate by 2007 standards….
    Now the leaves are beginning to turn, there’s a chill in the morning air, donations have improved, the private jet’s back on call, and, like Mark Twain, rumors of McCain’s political death proved premature.
    His Iraq-centered performance in the recent New Hampshire Republican debate won favorable coverage.
    He’s staking his final presidential run on being the candidate most vocally supportive of an unpopular war, a guy who wanted a troop surge before the administration thought of it.
    McCain has used Gen. David Petraeus’ report on Iraq in a sort of "I told you so" context to reinvigorate his campaign, combining it with sharper criticism of the Bush administration’s initial policies. A reference to an America in dire need of leadership is the closest McCain comes to even hinting he’s running for president….

Now, talk amongst yourselves…

Mike Huckabee on the obligation to govern

Huckabee1
By BRAD WARTHEN
EDITORIAL PAGE EDITOR
THERE’S A PRINCIPLE that I long thought was a given in American politics. As long as it held true, it didn’t matter so much if the “wrong” candidate won an election. No matter what sort of nonsense he had spouted on the stump, this stark truth would take him in its unforgiving grip, set him down and moderate him.
    Mike Huckabee, who is seeking the Republican nomination for president, made reference to this principle when he met with our editorial board Thursday:
    “One of the tough jobs of governing is, you actually have to do it.” That may sound so obvious that it’s foolish, like “One thing about water is, it’s wet.” But it can come as a cold shock.
    Think of the congressional class of 1994. Newt Gingrich’s bomb-throwers were full of radical notions when they gained power. But once they had it, and used it, however briefly, to shut down the government, they quickly realized that was not what they were elected to do.
    Or some of them realized it. More about that in a moment. Back to Mr. Huckabee.
    Mr. Huckabee is a conservative — the old-fashioned kind that believes in traditional values, and wants strong, effective institutions in our society to support and promote those values.
    Many newfangled “conservatives” seem just as likely to want to tear down as build up.
    If Mr. Huckabee was ever that way, being the governor of Arkansas made him less so. “As a governor, I’ve seen a different level of human life, maybe, than the folks who live in the protected bubble of Washington see,” he said. And as a governor who believed he must govern, he was appalled when he saw government fail to do its job. He points to the aftermath of Katrina: “It was one of the more, to me, disgusting moments of American history…. It made my blood boil….
   Perhaps I should pause again now to remind you that Gov. Huckabee is a conservative: “I’m 100 percent pure and orthodox when it comes to the issues that matter to the evangelical or faith voter, if you will,” he says.
    “But as a governor, I spent most of my time improving education, rebuilding the highway system, reforming health care in Arkansas” — things that are not inconsistent with conservatism.
    “And for that I had the right — had earned the right, if you will — to pass some pro-life legislation,Huckabee2
and strong pro-marriage and pro-family legislation. But I didn’t spend 90 percent of my time pushing that….”
    OK, let’s review: As a conservative, he has a certain set of ideals. But he knows that being governor isn’t just about promoting an ideology, whatever it might be. Being governor, if the job is properly understood, is the most pragmatic form of life in our solar system — except for being mayor.
    People expect certain things of you, and you’ve got to do them. Successful governors realize that, whether you’re promoting ideals or paving the roads, “The wrong thing to do is to go and to try to stick your fist in the face of the Legislature that you know is not necessarily with you, and create a fight.” (Gov. Huckabee had to deal with a Democratic assembly.)
    So what’s the right way?
    “You positively share your message, you communicate it… . If you can’t do that, I don’t think you can lead. Just… quite frankly, I don’t think you have a shot at it.”
    I know someone who needs to hear that. Remember the class of ’94? The only lesson Mark Sanford learned from shutting down the federal government was that it was worth trying again. So last year, he vetoed the entire state budget when lawmakers failed to hold spending to the artificial limits he had decreed.
    Of course, they overrode him. And he knew they would. For him, it was about the gesture, not about governing. It’s about ungoverning. It’s about the agenda of the Club for Growth.
    Gov. Huckabee, being conservative fiscally as well as otherwise, has been known to turn down taxes, but that’s an area where pragmatism can outweigh ideals:
“… We had a Supreme Court case where we were forced to deal with both equity and adequacy in education,” said Mr. Huckabee. “There was no way to do that without additional revenue.”
    Still, he refused to sign the tax bill Democrats gave him.
    “I didn’t think we were getting enough reform for the amount of money. It wasn’t that I didn’t support additional revenue, because I did, so I’ll be honest about that. But… we weren’t pushing for enough efficiency out of the system.” What sort of efficiency?
    “I wanted a greater level of school consolidation in order to fund the efficiency, which was a very unpopular thing.”
    Our governor has said he’s for school district consolidation (as am I), but he’s never done anything effective to achieve it. That would require building a constructive relationship with the Legislature.
    Another time, Gov. Huckabee actually opposed a tax cut. Why? That governing thing again: “Well, I supported the elimination of the grocery tax, but not the timing, and the timing would have meant we literally would have closed nursing homes, had to slash Medicaid. I mean, it’s one thing to trim the fat off the bone, it’s another thing, you know, to start going into the bone itself.”
    That wouldn’t worry the Club for Growth, about which Gov. Huckabee says, “They hate me. I call ’em the Club for Greed. That’s part of why they don’t like me… If people don’t have the courage to run for office, they can just give money to them and they’ll do the dirty work for you.”
    “I think it’s a sleazy way to do politics.”
    The Club for Growth loves Mark Sanford.
    I don’t know what sort of president Mike Huckabee would make, but I wonder whether he’d do another stint as governor….

For video, go to http://blogs.thestate.com/bradwarthensblog/.

Huckabee3

Mike McCurry for the ONE Campaign

   

Several years back, I went to the White House to visit South Carolinian Mike McCurry when he was Bill Clinton’s press secretary. He had a tough job at a tough time. It was at the height — or should I say, the depth — of the Monica Lewinsky madness. Here’s my column from back then.

Friday, he came to see me at my office, so now we’re even. He was in town on behalf of the ONE campaign. He was brought in by Adam Temple — formerly of the John McCain campaign — and Dave Wilson, the group’s Faith Community Director.

On the video, he gives an overview of what the ONE campaign is about.

Rick Beltram’s version, with apologies

Oops — I just found this in my much-neglected external e-mail account. I was sent to me a week ago by Rick Beltram, in response to this version of events by Zeke Stokes. Rick had called to ask if I’d post something in response, and I said send it to me, and he sent it, and I called it up, but I couldn’t post it right that second because I was doing about four things, and it got buried in subsequent messages almost immediately.

And my dog ate it.

Anyway, here it is:

  Brad:
  I read with great interest the letter that you posted from Zeke Stokes!
(sept.5)
  The letter although very touching and a bit humble is a complete fable.  I
first brought the concept of a complaint to the attention of the PRESS and
the REX campaign; before the end of the campaign in October 2006.  Instead
of Stokes backing down at the point; he ramped up the e-mails through the
end of the campaign.
  Although, he claims that others were doing the same thing no evidence can
support his claim; plus the fact that the Dems have had since June 2006
until  present to file an Ethics Complaint.  Nothing has ever been
submitted.
  However, my challenge to Stokes is to "undo" his guilty plea and let us
have a true Hearing.
  I was extremely disappointed in his cowardly actions.  He needs to stand
like a man and have a fair and OPEN hearing.  I can assure you and your
readers that the evidence that we submitted is so strong that if Stokes
would ever submit to a hearing; in my humble opinion, he will need to leave
any political career behind him in SC and move on!

— Rick Beltram

Where to find the income tax comparisons

You can find the state-by-state income tax comparison by S.C. Chief Economist Bill Gillespie that Cindi Scoppe wrote about in her column today by following this link. If that doesn’t work, you can go here and select State Individual Income Tax Comparisons for Tax Year 2005 on the left.

And here’s the draft of a less-complex analysis from the state treasurer’s office.

That’s all. Now you can go back to looking at fun stuff.

Unedited McCain footage

   


T
oday, I was "on the bus," as Ken Kesey would put it, with John McCain, attending events in Aiken and Lexington, and riding with the senator on his "No Surrender Tour" bus in between.

I have a lot more material than I can go through today, but in order not to keep my readers waiting entirely, here’s some fairly representative footage from the Lexington event — formally, the "Veterans Appreciation Lunch and No Surrender Rally," at 11:45 a.m. at the American Legion Post 7, just off just off Harmon Street.

The theme for the tour, which ends tonight in Charleston, was the war in Iraq, with McCain presenting points he’s been stressing — well, forever, really, but particularly since the Petraeus testimony last week. His message was pitched as an advance of what’s likely to happen next in the Senate, with Democrats and the president resuming the monotony of putting up an amendment with a withdrawal date, having it knocked down, putting up another one, etc.

Turnout was good at both events. You can see the SRO crowd at this one; the one in Aiken was much the same.

That’s all for now.

Long Tall Fred swaggers to the rescue, but of what?

By BRAD WARTHEN
Editorial Page Editor
FOR MONTHS NOW, “conservative” Republicans have waited for their hounddog-faced Godot, Fred Thompson, to bring something to the presidential contest that was missing.
    So it was that quite a few of us left our cool offices and moseyed down to Doc’s Barbecue Monday with a mind to learning what that something was.
    The star of screen, lobby and courtroom swaggered onto the riser in the parking lot and launched into a hickory-smoked litany of what he had been talking about since his previous foray into electoral politics back in the ’90s. His delivery had a poetic — or perhaps “lyrical,” in a country-song-lyrics sense — quality:

… talkin’ about the val-yuh (that’s “value” to you pantywaist Easterners) of being pro-life;
talkin’ about the value of standing strong for the second amendment;
talkin’ about the rule of law;
talkin’ about the value and the rightness of lower taxes;
talkin’ about a market economy; talking about the ingenuity and the inventiveness of the American people and the value of competitiveness and how we would fare well in the international marketplace. We do more things better than anybody in the world, and it works for us….

    OK, so maybe it got a trifle less lyrical there for a moment, but he got his rhythm back right quick:

We’re talking about first principles, things this country was founded upon,
the idea that there’s some things in this changing world that don’t change.
Certain things,
certain things such as human nature,
and the wisdom of the Ages that led us to the Declaration of Independence
and led us to the Constitution of the United States,
and they are not outmoded documents to be cast aside….

    OK, Fred, all that’s great, but who said they were — documents to be cast aside, I mean? Who’s the bad guy here? Certainly not the men who’ve been running their fannies off seeking the GOP nomination while you were playing Hamlet all these months.
    Sure, Rudy Giuliani might have a bit of trouble on the abortion thing, and so might Mitt Romney — depending which Mitt Romney you chose to believe from the assortment available on “YouTube.”
    But that other stuff? Come, on, this is boilerplate, par for the course, warming-up exercises, the kind of stuff Republican babies cut their teeth on.
    So what sets you apart, aside from the fact that you are obviously way-up-yonder tall? (I would have said “Rocky-Top tall,” but Fred and I are both Memphis State grads — from back when they called it Memphis State — so I can’t hang a U.T. image on him).
    One thing, as far as I can see — and it goes back to the predicate in the first sentence of my third paragraph: swaggered.
    That ol’ boy’s got more swagger on him than John Wayne in a roomful of Maureen O’Haras. It’s in his voice, and in everything he chooses of his own by-God free will to say with it. It’s in his accent; it’s in those jowls sliding off his face like McMansions on a muddy California hillside.Fred_thompson3
    I’d say it was literally in his walk, if I could ever see how he walks, but he always has a crowd around
him, with his craggy head poking up above it.
    Those crowds respond to him: The ladies like a man who sounds like he durn-well knows what he’s talking ’bout and don’t mind saying so, and the men can tell right off that he’s one-a them — or what they like to think of themselves as, from the swagger itself right down to that hot-dang wife a-his that smiles so purty when he brags about sirin’ them babies on her.
    All of this can disguise the fact that this is a very smart man of rather broad-ranging sophistication (I mentioned he went to Memphis State, right?), but nobody holds that against him.
    And so it was that he came a-ridin’ into town on that bus a-his with Johnny Cash boomin’ out of it, ridin’ to the rescue of… of what?
    Once again, what was lacking? Who had to be saved from what?
    Last month, ol’ Fred told David Broder that he only considered getting into the race because his friend John McCain had stumbled along the way. Before that, “I expected to support John, just as I did in 2000,” he said.
    I remember him supporting McCain back then, because he came to see me at the time, and said we were wrong to have endorsed George W. Bush in the S.C. primary. And he was right.
    So I found myself puzzled last week, a week in which the biggest political news was the resurgence of John McCain. A few days after a well-reviewed debate performance in New Hampshire, the Arizonan was back in Washington to hear Gen. David Petraeus — who might as well have had a “McCain in ’08” button wedged among those rows of ribbons on his chest — tell the world that the strategy Sen. McCain had advocated for the last four years had succeeded. Suddenly the guy who was supposed to have fallen on his sword over Iraq looked “prescient and courageous on the campaign’s most vital issue,” according to The Associated Press.
    Sure, there are those Republicans who are still hot because Sen. McCain isn’t mean enough to Mexicans, whereas ol’ Fred leaves little doubt that he’d kick their Rio-moistened behinds clear back to Juarez.
    But while I grant you the man sure can swagger, I still find myself wondering: Why’s he swaggering into town now?

For video and more, go to http://blogs.thestate.com/bradwarthensblog/.

Fred Thompson’s values mantra, and more!

Thompson_047

This morning, when I said something about going to Doc’s Barbecue today to see what Fred Thompson had to say, a colleague tried to save me the trouble by telling me ahead of time: "I’m for good things, and against bad things."

Sure enough, it was just about that broad and elemental. Ol’ Fred trotted out everything but Mom and Apple Pie. Not a lot of specifics, mind you, but a whole lot of empathizin’ with the folks on stuff that may not be all that fancy or original, but dadgummit, just needs to be said again and again, with fierce conviction. And he’s just the fella to say it.

The video below features the following values mantra, plus another snippet or two that give you the flavor of the kind of skate-by-on-good-feelings-and-free-media campaign that ol’ Fred is apparently gonna run just as long as we’ll all let him. Nobody asking hard questions, such as exactly how these statements separate him from the rest of the GOP pack.

But before the nit-picking begins, enjoy Fred Thompson at what I suspect is going to be his campaignin’ best. I’m glad I was there for it, even though I had to park my pickup — my actual pickup that is my actual primary means of transportation, not a lease — far enough away that I should have just walked over…

And here’s the Mantra in text so you can listen to it again, and follow along:

talkin’ about the value of being pro-life
talkin’ about the value of standing strong for the second amendment
talkin’ about the rule of law
talkin’ about the value and the rightness of lower taxes
talkin’ about a market economy; talking about the ingenuity and the inventiveness of the American people and the value of competitiveness and how we would fare well in the international marketplace. We do more things better than anybody in the world, and it works for us.

We’re talking about first principles, things this country was founded upon
the idea that there’s some things in this changing world that don’t change.
Certain things,
certain things such as human nature
and the wisdom of the Ages that led us to the declaration of independence
and led us to the Constitution of the United States,
and they are not outmoded documents to be cast aside

The Declaration reminds us that our basic rights come from God
and not from government.
The constitution of the United States tells us that government ought to be set up with divided power,
not too much power any way
not just at the federal level,
between the federal and the state level;
it’s called Federalism,
and it’s the idea that not every answer comes from Washington, D.C.

It’s all based on the concept of that universal principle and desire on which we were founded,
and that is,
Free People.
Free Markets.
and the appreciation of the things that made us great,
and the understanding that a government powerful enough to give everything to yuh,
is powerful enough to take anything from yuh.

Thank yuh. Thank yuh very much. Now go get yerself some barbecue whilst we turn up the Johnny Cash on the loudspeakers…

Maybe Fred’ll wave as he goes by

Fred Thompson’s coming by the newspaper today — quite literally, in that he’ll pass right by us to go to Doc’s Barbecue:

Fredheadergeneric
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: CONTACT: Jeff Sadosky 
September 7, 2007    

***MEDIA ADVISORY***
Thompson To Tour South Carolina

McLEAN, VA – Friends of Fred Thompson Committee announces campaign schedule and logistics for South Carolina events for September 10th, 2007. 

MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 10th
GREENVILLE, SC
WHAT:   Town Hall with Fred Thompson
WHEN:   9:30 am, please preset all equipment by 9:00 am
WHERE: Greenville Marriott
             1 Parkway East
             Greenville, SC 29615

NOTE:    TV Quality Lighting and Sound, Press Riser, Mult Box Available, 35ft throw

COLUMBIA, SC
WHAT:   Meet Fred Thompson
WHEN:   1:30 PM, please preset all equipment by 1:00 PM
WHERE: Doc’s Barbeque & Southern Buffet
             1601 Shop Road, Columbia, SC 29201
NOTE:    TV Quality Lighting, Press Riser, Outdoor Amplified Sound, Mult Box Available, 35ft throw

ALL TIMES LOCAL AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE

Doc’s is really, really close to our offices. I was guessing Friday, when this release arrived, that it was within 200 yards. Mike allowed as how it was closer, maybe a 5 iron — which was OK until he added "150 yards," which opened him to all kinds of scorn, enabling me to say, "That’s a 7 iron for me," and other such zingers.

Now mind you, it’s not like we’ve invited Fred to come by and say "Hey." We would have, but Mike (he of the short game) said he doesn’t know of a contact for Fred here in S.C. (Perhaps we’ll hear from one as a result of this post; I find a blog is a wonderful form of passive information gathering.)

Not that he has to be invited. He invited himself back in 2000, when he was here to tell us we should have endorsed — ahem! — John McCain. (And he was right.)

But this time, he’s going to go right past us. Now mind you, Doc’s has an excellent reputation. My parents go there regularly. But there’s "good barbecue" and there’s good barbecue, and if Fred thinks he’s going to find Memphis-style there — the sort that he and I are accustomed to as the standard — he’s in for a shock.

Anyway, there’s something interestingly symbolic about his going to the people (the ones his campaign autodialed over the weekend) rather than coming to kiss our rings. It’s indicative of the state of things on this belated honeymoon that Fred will enjoy for, oh, the next week or two. He doesn’t have to show up for debates or answer newspaper editors’ questions. He can coast on free media that concentrates on him and him alone — and what better than an event staged at a barbecue stand, where he can go "mmm-MMM" (think "Andy Griffith eating a Ritz cracker") and say it’s the best barbecue ever, and be believed.

But at some point, this will be over, and the hard part will start.

Checking in with Emile, picking up some pork and other good stuff

With my wife back in town, and what with her missing buying fresh local produce from the Amish up in PA, we took Emile DeFelice up on his invitation to head downtown for the alternative farmer’s market at Gervais and Vine.

We got there sort of late, and some of the vendors were shutting down, but we bought some pork chops, Italian sausage and breakfast links from Emile, and some okra from somebody else — nice little tender ones, too, none of your stringy gigantic pods you tend to get late in the growth cycle. Oh, yeah — and a couple of pounds of ground Angus beef.

It was a little pricey — to which my wife, an organic gardener since college days, says it’s better this way because when she goes to the supermarket she’s tempted to buy stuff she doesn’t need. I also find it hard to reconcile the ideas of "local" and "fresh" with frozen meat. But as Juanita says, if you’re not going to do hormones and preservatives and all that garbage, you have to freeze it. She says that with one of those looks and tones like she can’t believe she married, and bore 5 children for, such an idiot.

Hey, but I’m down with the whole Mr. Natural thing, and always have been. When she and I were first married, and living in what had been her grandparents’ house in Jackson, TN, we were really into that stuff. So much so, in fact, that right after we started living there, a natural-foods store called The Pumpkin Seed opened in a tiny space at the back of what had been her grandfather’s drug store across the little side street the house was on. It was run by a couple a little older than we were who had dropped out and had a dairy farm up in Carroll County. They would give us free manure for our garden — which was about 30 feet from the door of their shop. Since dairy products are deadly to me, I never had any of their milk, but they said it was really good except for the taste of the onion grass the cows ate.

Which sort of brings us back to Emile’s farm, where the hogs graze on whatever they want, and lie around and do whatever they want, except, presumably, watch TV, because that would make them get all flabby.

Emile’s a political guy and sure enough, there’s a political statement in this farmer’s market, which is a deliberate alternative to the State Farmers Market, which caters to a lot of out-of-state vendors and products, and which is subsidized by a lot of tax money, which Emile is against. (So are we, for that matter — we’ve fought unsuccessfully to keep state money from being wasted on the new one out at the end of Shop Road.)

And seeing as how it’s such a political farmer’s market and all, it was fitting that Emile said our own Doug Ross had dropped by earlier, which sort of blew his mind, meeting somebody he’d previously known only virtually in the flesh. And while we were there, Bud Ferillo came by and got himself a late breakfast of fresh strawberry crepes. So it was a happening place.

Emile says he’s going to send us some more info on where to buy local and natural on a regular basis, and I’ll post it here when I get it.

I ain’t gonna work on Emile’s farm no more… hang on, I gotta get my ax, cuz I’ve got another one comin’ on…

Thank goodness for New Mexico

At least we don’t have terrible problems like New Mexico. It seems that on Thursday, their (former) state treasurer pleaded guilty to a crime! Goodness!

{BC-NM Treasurer Convicted, 1st Ld-Writethru,0417}
{By BARRY MASSEY}=
{Associated Press Writer}=
   SANTA FE, N.M. (AP) – Former New Mexico Treasurer Michael Montoya pleaded guilty Thursday to a state racketeering charge for his role in a kickback scheme, a case that grew out of his testimony in a federal prosecution of another former state treasurer.
   Montoya had faced 16 state criminal charges, including soliciting or receiving illegal kickbacks and receiving or demanding bribes. Under a plea agreement, he pleaded guilty to the one count of racketeering and all other charges were dismissed. There was no agreement on sentencing.
   The prosecution was criticized by defense lawyers, who said the state rarely brings charges against witnesses for criminal activities they testified about while cooperating in a federal case.
   Montoya was a key witness for federal prosecutors in the case against Robert Vigil, who served as deputy treasurer under Montoya and succeeded him in the top job. Vigil is serving a three-year federal prison sentence for his conviction last year on a charge of attempted extortion.
   State prosecutors said Montoya demanded kickbacks from investment advisers in exchange for steering state business to them. Similar allegations were made against Vigil by federal prosecutors. Only Montoya was charged by the state because its case was filed while a federal retrial for Vigil was pending.
   Montoya, who will be sentenced Nov. 1, could receive up to nine years in prison and a fine of up to $10,000.
   Montoya, a Democrat, served as treasurer from 1995 to 2002. Vigil then held the job until he resigned in 2005.
   In November 2005, Montoya pleaded guilty to a federal felony relating to the kickback scheme. He has not yet been sentenced.
   With his plea in the state case, Montoya agreed to testify for the state in its prosecution of other defendants facing state charges stemming from the corruption in the treasurer’s office. Trials for a former treasurer’s office employee, an Albuquerque businessman and a California-based investment are set for later this year.